Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Papers
(The H4-Index of Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance is 19. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-06-01 to 2026-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
Misinterpretation of statistical nonsignificance as a sign of potential bias: Hydroxychloroquine as a case study208
Addressing serious and continuing research noncompliance and integrity violations through action plans: Interviews with institutional officials104
The case for affiliation contribution statements63
Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students49
Mitigating global climate change and its environmental impact is a key social responsibility of scientists and should be part of research ethics policies and guidelines42
On the epistemological and methodological implications of AI co-authorship39
Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality34
Inclusive, engaged, and accountable institutional review boards32
Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers30
Ethical committee frameworks and processes used to evaluate humanities research require reform: Findings from a UK-wide network consultation26
Fake no more: The redemption of ChatGPT in literature reviews26
Correction25
How (not) to be held accountable in research: A reply to my critics24
Procrastination and inconsistency: Expressions of concern for publications with compromised integrity24
Faculty-student differences in authorship perceptions before and after authorship ethics interventions22
Inverted U-Shaped relationship between team size and citation impact: Mediating role of responsibility diffusion21
Analysis of scientific paper retractions due to data problems: Revealing challenges and countermeasures in data management20
Characteristics of blacklisted journals: Evidence from Chinese-language academic journals20
Statement of Retraction: Assessing database accuracy for article retractions: A preliminary study comparing Retraction Watch Database, PubMed, and Web of Science19
0.41149497032166