Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Behavioral Decision Making is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-09-01 to 2025-09-01.)
ArticleCitations
42
The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk16
The Categorization of Continuous Attributes15
Future–present relationship insensitivity: A new perspective on psychological myopia and psychological hyperopia14
Do We Really Believe That “More Is Better”? Mapping Implicit and Explicit Associations Between Quantity and Quality13
Preference for quicker offers: The critical roles of temporal reference points and evaluation mode11
Episodic Future Thinking Only Reduces Delay Discounting When Future Events Involve the Self11
Ambiguity Preference in Waiting Time: Investigating the Desirability Effect and the Interplay of Temporal Description, Outcome Category, and Evaluation Mode9
Correction to “The Categorization of Continuous Attributes”8
Culture versus other sources of variance in risk and benefit perceptions: A comparison of Japan and the United States8
Consulting Multiple Advisors: When It Hurts and When It Does Not Hurt the Advisor–Advisee Relationship?8
Equivalence Framing and the Construction of Advocacy Messages7
An Exploration of How Motivations and Perceived Ability Influence an Advisor's Willingness to Give Advice7
7
Emotion and intergroup cooperation: How verbal expressions of guilt, shame, and pride influence behavior in a social dilemma7
Impact of choice set complexity on decoy effects7
Resource Constraints Lead to Biased Attention but Decrease Unethical Behavior6
Correction to “Determinants of Economic Risk Preferences Across Adolescence”6
Issue Information6
Proud to Be Dishonest: Emotional Consequences of Altruistic Versus Egoistic Dishonesty6
How false feedback influences decision‐makers' risk preferences5
Issue Information5
Issue Information5
A longitudinal approach for understanding algorithm use5
Issue Information5
Issue Information5
Noisy Retrieval of Experienced Probabilities Underlies Rational Judgment of Uncertain Multiple Events5
How the anchor moves: Measuring and comparing the anchoring bias in autistic and neurotypical individuals5
Mixed‐effects regression weights for advice taking and related phenomena of information sampling and utilization4
Guessing, math, or something else? Lay people's processes for valuing annuities4
Comparison‐specific preferences: The attentional dilution effect for delay and risk4
Framing Biases in Plea Bargaining Decisions: Fairness Under the Law4
The “Why Me?” Model: Explaining Moral Judgments in the Eyes of Single Versus Several Victims4
When Half Is at Least 50%: Effect of “Framing” and Probability Level on Frequency Estimates4
Issue Information4
Cover Image4
Framing the Default Option Right4
From Preparation to Performance: Conscientiousness Predicts Negotiation Planning and Value Claiming4
4
Measurement invariance of the Domain‐Specific Risk‐Taking (DOSPERT) scale4
Dynamics of Reliance on Algorithmic Advice4
3
Choosing Versus Rejecting: The Effect of Decision Mode on Subsequent Preferential Choices3
Issue Information3
Going with the crowd in volatile times: Exposure to environmental variability increases people's preference for popular options3
Mementos and the endowment effect3
Demand for information about potential wins and losses: Does it matter if information matters?3
Predicting a win by a small margin: The effect of graphic scaling in published polls on voters' predictions3
Emotions and financial risk‐taking in the lab: A meta‐analysis3
The effect of state and trait power on financial risk taking: The mediating and moderating roles of focus on rewards versus threats3
Measurement effects in decision‐making3
Issue Information3
Does IQ predict engagement with skill‐based gambling? Large‐scale evidence from horserace betting3
Choice Bolstering Changes Attribute Importance and Affects Future Choices3
3
Decision‐making styles and goal striving3
0.031831026077271