Applied Cognitive Psychology

Papers
(The H4-Index of Applied Cognitive Psychology is 17. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-09-01 to 2024-09-01.)
ArticleCitations
When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic127
Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID‐19 pandemic91
Exploring the use of rapport in professional information‐gathering contexts by systematically mapping the evidence base55
Social isolation during COVID‐19 lockdown impairs cognitive function48
The usual suspects: How psychological motives and thinking styles predict the endorsement of well‐known and COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs43
Maybe a free thinker but not a critical one: High conspiracy belief is associated with low critical thinking ability40
Testing the affective events theory: The mediating role of affect and the moderating role of mindfulness34
Learning in double time: The effect of lecture video speed on immediate and delayed comprehension32
Does the cognitive approach to lie detection improve the accuracy of human observers?25
Discriminating deceptive from truthful statements using the verifiability approach: A meta‐analysis24
A meta‐analytic review of the timing for disclosing evidence when interviewing suspects24
Myths and misconceptions about hypnosis and suggestion: Separating fact and fiction23
Conspiracy theory beliefs, scientific reasoning and the analytical thinking paradox21
A meta‐analytic review of the Self‐Administered Interview©: Quantity and accuracy of details reported on initial and subsequent retrieval attempts21
Telling people to “rely on their reasoning” increases intentions to wear a face covering to slow down COVID‐19 transmission19
Validity of content‐based techniques for credibility assessment—How telling is an extended meta‐analysis taking research bias into account?18
Individual differences in risk perception and misperception of COVID‐19 in the context of political ideology17
Decision making and heart rate variability: A systematic review17
0.02517294883728