Informal Logic

Papers
(The TQCC of Informal Logic is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
In Memoriam10
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation8
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures5
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy5
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation5
Sincere and Insincere Arguing4
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation4
The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism4
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues3
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction3
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation3
Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing3
Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments3
Books Received 09-27-20242
Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory2
Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction2
The Argument Scheme-based Approach to Argument Structure2
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent2
Gilbert as Disrupter2
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit2
In Memoriam Michael Scriven1
Notice of Books Received1
In Memoriam1
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments1
Books Recieved 44(4)1
Frustrated and Aware1
Navigating Argumentation1
Argumentative Bullshit1
Introduction to the Special Issue1
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons1
Introduction to the Special Issue1
Metaphorical Argumentation1
Books Received 45(1)1
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind1
Books Received1
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments1
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking1
Arguing About Arguing with Arguments1
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?1
0.040151834487915