Informal Logic

Papers
(The TQCC of Informal Logic is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-02-01 to 2025-02-01.)
ArticleCitations
Notice of Books Received8
In Memoriam6
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation5
Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty5
Argumentative Bullshit5
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation4
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures3
Books Received3
An Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Metaphorical Ad Hominem Arguments3
Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education3
Books Received3
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy3
Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate3
Sincere and Insincere Arguing2
The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism2
Is Every Definition Persuasive?2
Particularism About Arguments2
John Hayden Woods 1937-20242
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues2
From the Editors1
Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy1
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation1
Picturing a Thousand Unspoken Words1
How do Explanations Justify?1
Multi-Modal 20201
Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time1
In Memoriam1
Introduction to the Special Issue1
You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure1
Editor's Note1
Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing1
Notice of Books Received1
Notice of Books Received1
On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy1
Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?1
Notice of Books Received1
Small but Significant Errata/Typos in the Paper “The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism”1
Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?1
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction1
0.038262128829956