Informal Logic

Papers
(The TQCC of Informal Logic is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation11
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy9
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation8
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures7
Sincere and Insincere Arguing7
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation7
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction6
Two-Tier Fallacy Theory6
Introducing Susan Stebbing as a Forerunner of Informal Logic6
Protest as Argument4
Books Received 09-27-20244
Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments4
The Argument Scheme-based Approach to Argument Structure3
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent3
Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory3
Gilbert as Disrupter2
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit2
Books Received2
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind2
Books Received 45(1)2
Towards a Taxonomy of Bullshit Illocutionary Acts2
Introduction to the special issue on selected papers from the 2nd International Conference on Debate & Dialogue (ICDD2) 20252
Mind The Gap2
Navigating Argumentation2
In Memoriam2
Sound Tactics1
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?1
Arguing About Arguing with Arguments1
Arabic Argumentation1
From the Editors1
A Moderate Defense for Visual Arguments1
Paley’s Principle:1
An Invitation to Transformation1
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons1
Frustrated and Aware1
AILACT Essay Prize CFP 20251
How do Explanations Justify?1
Books Received 45(4)1
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments1
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking1
Books Recieved 44(4)1
Rational Force of Analogy/Qiyās in Law1
Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty1
Small but Significant Errata/Typos in the Paper “The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism”1
What Makes an Argument Strong?1
In Memoriam Michael Scriven1
0.036397933959961