Informal Logic

(The median citation count of Informal Logic is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 500 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2019-08-01 to 2023-08-01.)
Adversariality and Argumentation14
The Role of Trust in Argumentation12
Should Climate Scientists Fly?8
Argumentative Strategies and Stylistic Devices7
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues6
“I Said What I Said”—Black Women and Argumentative Politeness Norms5
Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing5
On Presumptions, Burdens of Proof, and Explanations4
Tense Arguments4
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation4
Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement4
Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction3
Come Now, Let Us Reason Together3
Emotive Meaning in Political Argumentation3
Youth Voting, Rational Competency, and Epistemic Injustice2
Profiles of Dialogue for Amphiboly2
Inference Claims as Assertions2
Argumentation Profiles2
Exploring the Effect of a Scaffolding Design on Students’ Argument Critique Skills2
Is it Permissible to Teach Buddhist Mindfulness Meditation in a Critical Thinking Course?2
Emotions in Argumentative Narration2
Good and Bad Reasoning about COVID-192
Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education1
Proposal of a Classification of Analogies1
Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies1
Some Limits to Arguing Virtuously1
Discovering Warrants in Political Argumentation1
On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy1
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent1
Emotive Figures as "Shown" Emotion in Italian Post-Unification Conduct Books (1860-1900)1
Rooting Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation in Jung, and Its Extension to Law1
CAT Scan: A Critical Review of the Critical-Thinking Assessment Test1
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures1
Reflections on Minimal Adversariality1
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit1
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons1
An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes1
What is Wrong with Deductivism?1
Putting Reasons in their Place0
The Rhetorical and Argumentative Relevance of "Extreme Consequence" in Advertising0
Notice of Books Received0
Gilbert as Disrupter0
Introduction to the Special Issue0
A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions0
Kisceral Argumentation in Law0
Justifying Particular Reasoning in a Legal Context0
The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking0
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly0
Books Received0
Evidence, Persuasion and Diversity0
Argumentative Bullshit0
Notice of Books Received0
Is Every Definition Persuasive?0
Group Identity in Public Deliberation0
Other-Regarding Virtues and Their Place in Virtue Argumentation Theory0
Notice of Books Received0
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind0
Metaphorical Argumentation0
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction0
A Simple Theory of Argument Schemes0
You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure0
"Argument and Social Justice" and "Reasoning for Change"0
Editor's Note0
Notice of Books Received0
An Unlikely Source of (Absurd and Effective) Case Studies for Introductory Informal Logic0
Notice of Books Received0
Old Delivery and Modern Demagogy0
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?0
Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy0
Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?0
Resolution of Deep Disagreement: Not Simply Consensus0
Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate0
Books Received0
In Memoriam0
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy0
Robert Pinto0
In Memoriam0
Notice of Books Received0
Notice of Books Received0
On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation0
New Board Members0
Multi-Modal 20200
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments0
Credible as Evidence? Multilayered Audience Reception of Narrative Arguments0
From the Editors0
Educating Students to Consistency via Argumentation0
Notice of Books Received0
Source Related Argumentation Found in Science Websites0
Picturing a Thousand Unspoken Words0
Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue0
Introduction to the Special Issue0
Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?0
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking0
Amenable Argumentation Approach0
Review of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective0
The Basic Components of Agreement0
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments0
Books Received0
Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type0
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation0
Review of Truth in Fiction: Rethinking its Logic0
The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism0
Notice of Books Received0
Review of Narration as Argument, edited by Paula Olmos0
From the Editors0
Notice of Books Received0
Burdens of Proposing0
In Memoriam0
Act or Object0
Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time0
Notice of Books Received0
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation0