OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Informal Logic is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)

Article	Citations
The Role of Trust in Argumentation	16
Should Climate Scientists Fly?	8
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues	8
Good and Bad Reasoning about COVID-19	6
Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement	5
Argumentation Profiles	5
“I Said What I Said”—Black Women and Argumentative Politeness Norms	5
Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing	5
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation	4
Other-Regarding Virtues and Their Place in Virtue Argumentation Theory	4
On Presumptions, Burdens of Proof, and Explanations	4
Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction	3
An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes	3
Inference Claims as Assertions	3
Is it Permissible to Teach Buddhist Mindfulness Meditation in a Critical Thinking Course?	2
Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education	2
Credible as Evidence? Multilayered Audience Reception of Narrative Arguments	2
Youth Voting, Rational Competency, and Epistemic Injustice	2
Exploring the Effect of a Scaffolding Design on Students’ Argument Critique Skills	2
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent	2
The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking	2
Reflections on Minimal Adversariality	1
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit	1
Some Limits to Arguing Virtuously	1
CAT Scan: A Critical Review of the Critical-Thinking Assessment Test	1

Is Every Definition Persuasive?	1
A Simple Theory of Argument Schemes	1
Burdens of Proposing	1
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking	1
Rooting Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation in Jung, and Its Extension to Law	1
On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy	1
The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism	1
Fact and Opinion	1
Introduction to the Special Issue	1
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons	1
Discovering Warrants in Political Argumentation	1
What is Wrong with Deductivism?	1
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures	1
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction	0
Cet obscure object du désir (philosophique)	0
In Memoriam	0
Justifying Particular Reasoning in a Legal Context	0
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind	0
Amenable Argumentation Approach	0
Argumentative Bullshit	0
Group Identity in Public Deliberation	0
Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue	0
Books Received	0
A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions	0
Books Received	0
Arguing with Arguments	0
Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Source Related Argumentation Found in Science Websites	0
Evidence, Persuasion and Diversity	0
Gilbert as Disrupter	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Generative AI and Argument Creativity	0
Picturing a Thousand Unspoken Words	0
Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy	0
What Makes an Argument Strong?	0
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments	0
From the Editors	0
On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation	0
Notice of Books Received	0
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation	0
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments	0
Kisceral Argumentation in Law	0
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation	0
Metaphorical Argumentation	0
Are Fallacies Frequent ?	0
Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?	0
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments	0

Books Received	0
Books Received	0
Books Received	0
Putting Reasons in their Place	0
Une réaction à la critique depuis les marges épistémologiques	0
Review of Narration as Argument, edited by Paula Olmos	0
Multi-Modal 2020	0
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation	0
Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?	0
Arguments from Fairness and Extensive Interpretation in Greek Judicial Rhetoric	0
In Memoriam	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly	0
Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time	0
From the Editors	0
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?	0
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate	0
Act or Object	0
Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments	0
Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation	0
The Basic Components of Agreement	0
In Memoriam	0
"Argument and Social Justice" and "Reasoning for Change"	0
Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type	0
An Unlikely Source of (Absurd and Effective) Case Studies for Introductory Informal Logic	0
À la mémoire de Michael Scriven	0
Notice of Books Received	0
You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure	0
Editor's Note	0
Introduction to the Special Issue	0
Resolution of Deep Disagreement: Not Simply Consensus	0