OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Informal Logic is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)

Article	Citations
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues	8
Good and Bad Reasoning about COVID-19	6
Argumentation Profiles	6
Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement	5
Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing	5
“I Said What I Said”—Black Women and Argumentative Politeness Norms	5
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation	4
Inference Claims as Assertions	3
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly	3
Exploring the Effect of a Scaffolding Design on Students’ Argument Critique Skills	3
Youth Voting, Rational Competency, and Epistemic Injustice	3
An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes	3
Credible as Evidence? Multilayered Audience Reception of Narrative Arguments	3
Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction	3
The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking	3
Some Limits to Arguing Virtuously	2
Is Every Definition Persuasive?	2
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent	2
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons	2
Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education	2
Is it Permissible to Teach Buddhist Mindfulness Meditation in a Critical Thinking Course?	2
A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines	2
Picturing a Thousand Unspoken Words	1
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation	1
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy	1

Fact and Opinion	1
Introduction to the Special Issue	1
Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue	1
The Basic Components of Agreement	1
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction	1
The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism	1
A Simple Theory of Argument Schemes	1
Reflections on Minimal Adversariality	1
Arguing with Arguments	1
Arguments from Fairness and Extensive Interpretation in Greek Judicial Rhetoric	1
Discovering Warrants in Political Argumentation	1
On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy	1
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures	1
Burdens of Proposing	1
What Makes an Argument Strong?	1
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit	1
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking	1
Notice of Books Received	0
Introduction to the Special Issue	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory	0
From the Editors	0
Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty	0
That Obscure Object of (Philosophical) Desire	0
In Memoriam J. Anthony Blair	0
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation	0
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind	0
Amenable Argumentation Approach	0
Books Received	0
Systemic Means of Persuasion and Argument Evaluation	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Act or Object	0
Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments	0
Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation	0
Books Recieved	0
"Argument and Social Justice" and "Reasoning for Change"	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Editor's Note	0
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation	0
Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy	0
Generative AI and Argument Creativity	0
Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time	0
Group Identity in Public Deliberation	0
Sincere and Insincere Arguing	0
On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation	0
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments	0
Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate	0
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments	0

Kisceral Argumentation in Law	0
In Memoriam	0
Argument Evaluation: If your Snark be a Boojum…	0
Notice of Books Received	0
When Meaning Becomes Controversial	0
A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions	0
Books Received	0
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments	0
Putting Reasons in their Place	0
In Memoriam Michael Scriven	0
Multi-Modal 2020	0
You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure	0
Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?	0
Books Received 09-27-2024	0
In Memoriam	0
As Syllable from Sound	0
Particularism About Arguments	0
Notice of Books Received	0
An Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Metaphorical Ad Hominem Arguments	0
From the Editors	0
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?	0
Books Received	0
On the Ethics of Real-Life Examples of Argument	0
In Memoriam	0
Argumentative Bullshit	0
Metaphorical Argumentation	0
Are Fallacies Frequent ?	0
Books Received	0
Does argumentation change minds?	0
Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?	0
Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type	0
Gilbert as Disrupter	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?	0