OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Informal Logic is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-06-01 to 2025-06-01.)

Article	Citations
In Memoriam	11
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures	8
The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism	5
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy	5
Sincere and Insincere Arguing	5
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation	5
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation	4
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues	4
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation	4
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction	4
Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing	3
Books Received 45(1)	3
The Argument Scheme-based Approach to Argument Structure	3
Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments	3
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation	3
Books Received 09-27-2024	3
Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory	3
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit	3
Navigating Argumentation	2
Gilbert as Disrupter	2
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind	2
Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction	2
Books Received	2
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent	2
Notice of Books Received	2

Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?	1
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons	1
Introduction to the Special Issue	1
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments	1
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments	1
Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty	1
How do Explanations Justify?	1
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking	1
Argumentative Bullshit	1
In Memoriam	1
Arguing About Arguing with Arguments	1
Metaphorical Argumentation	1
From the Editors	1
A Moderate Defense for Visual Arguments	1
Books Recieved 44(4)	1
In Memoriam Michael Scriven	1
Introduction to the Special Issue	1
A Simple Theory of Argument Schemes	1
What Makes an Argument Strong?	1
Small but Significant Errata/Typos in the Paper “The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism”	1
Frustrated and Aware	1
Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy	0
Does argumentation change minds?	0
From the Editors	0
Is False Dilemma Really a Formal Fallacy?	0
Multi-Modal 2020	0
Reply to Yu and Zenker	0
In Memoriam	0
Books Recieved	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation	0
On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation	0
On the Ethics of Real-Life Examples of Argument	0
On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal	0
Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?	0
Fact and Opinion	0
An Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Metaphorical Ad Hominem Arguments	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Systemic Means of Persuasion and Argument Evaluation	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate	0
John Hayden Woods 1937-2024	0
Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type	0
Credible as Evidence? Multilayered Audience Reception of Narrative Arguments	0
On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy	0
Particularism About Arguments	0
Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?	0
Argument Evaluation: If your Snark be a Boojum…	0
Discovering Warrants in Political Argumentation	0
A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines	0

As Syllable from Sound	0
Books Received	0
Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time	0
Review of Review Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue By Marcin Lewiński and Mark Aakhus	0
Reflections on Minimal Adversariality	0
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly	0
Notice of Books Received	0
You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure	0
Generative AI and Argument Creativity	0
Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments	0
What are Deep Disagreements?	0
The Basic Components of Agreement	0
Burdens of Proposing	0
Is Every Definition Persuasive?	0
A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions	0
The Relevance of Moral Emotional Appeals in Environmental Political Debates	0
An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes	0
Amenable Argumentation Approach	0
In Memoriam J. Anthony Blair	0
Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?	0
The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking	0
Argumentation Profiles	0
Arguments from Fairness and Extensive Interpretation in Greek Judicial Rhetoric	0
Arguing with Arguments	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Group Identity in Public Deliberation	0
Kisceral Argumentation in Law	0
Books Received	0
Inference Claims as Assertions	0
Are Fallacies Frequent ?	0
When Meaning Becomes Controversial	0
Act or Object	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Books Received	0
That Obscure Object of (Philosophical) Desire	0
Argumentation, Cooperation, and Disagreement	0
Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement	0