OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Informal Logic is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 500 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2019-08-01 to 2023-08-01.)

Article	Citations
Adversariality and Argumentation	14
The Role of Trust in Argumentation	12
Should Climate Scientists Fly?	8
Argumentative Strategies and Stylistic Devices	7
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues	6
Preface	5
“I Said What I Said”—Black Women and Argumentative Politeness Norms	5
Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing	5
Frozen	5
On Presumptions, Burdens of Proof, and Explanations	4
Tense Arguments	4
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation	4
Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement	4
Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction	3
Come Now, Let Us Reason Together	3
Emotive Meaning in Political Argumentation	3
Youth Voting, Rational Competency, and Epistemic Injustice	2
Profiles of Dialogue for Amphiboly	2
Inference Claims as Assertions	2
Argumentation Profiles	2
Exploring the Effect of a Scaffolding Design on Students’ Argument Critique Skills	2
Is it Permissible to Teach Buddhist Mindfulness Meditation in a Critical Thinking Course?	2
Emotions in Argumentative Narration	2
Good and Bad Reasoning about COVID-19	2
Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education	1

Proposal of a Classification of Analogies	1
Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies	1
Some Limits to Arguing Virtuously	1
Discovering Warrants in Political Argumentation	1
On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy	1
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent	1
Emotive Figures as "Shown" Emotion in Italian Post-Unification Conduct Books (1860-1900)	1
Rooting Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation in Jung, and Its Extension to Law	1
CAT Scan: A Critical Review of the Critical-Thinking Assessment Test	1
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures	1
Reflections on Minimal Adversariality	1
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit	1
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons	1
An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes	1
What is Wrong with Deductivism?	1
Putting Reasons in their Place	0
The Rhetorical and Argumentative Relevance of "Extreme Consequence" in Advertising	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Gilbert as Disrupter	0
Introduction to the Special Issue	0
A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions	0
Kisceral Argumentation in Law	0
Justifying Particular Reasoning in a Legal Context	0
The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking	0
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly	0
Books Received	0
Evidence, Persuasion and Diversity	0
Argumentative Bullshit	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Is Every Definition Persuasive?	0
Group Identity in Public Deliberation	0
Other-Regarding Virtues and Their Place in Virtue Argumentation Theory	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind	0
Metaphorical Argumentation	0
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction	0
A Simple Theory of Argument Schemes	0
You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure	0
"Argument and Social Justice" and "Reasoning for Change"	0
Editor's Note	0
Notice of Books Received	0
An Unlikely Source of (Absurd and Effective) Case Studies for Introductory Informal Logic	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Old Delivery and Modern Demagogy	0
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?	0
Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy	0
Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?	0
Resolution of Deep Disagreement: Not Simply Consensus	0
Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate	0
Books Received	0

In Memoriam	0
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy	0
Robert Pinto	0
In Memoriam	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Notice of Books Received	0
On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation	0
New Board Members	0
Multi-Modal 2020	0
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments	0
Credible as Evidence? Multilayered Audience Reception of Narrative Arguments	0
From the Editors	0
Educating Students to Consistency via Argumentation	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Source Related Argumentation Found in Science Websites	0
Picturing a Thousand Unspoken Words	0
Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue	0
Introduction to the Special Issue	0
Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?	0
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking	0
Amenable Argumentation Approach	0
Review of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective	0
The Basic Components of Agreement	0
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments	0
Books Received	0
Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type	0
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation	0
Review of Truth in Fiction: Rethinking its Logic	0
The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Review of Narration as Argument, edited by Paula Olmos	0
From the Editors	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Burdens of Proposing	0
In Memoriam	0
Act or Object	0
Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation	0