Informal Logic

Papers
(The median citation count of Informal Logic is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
In Memoriam10
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation8
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation5
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures5
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy5
The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism4
Sincere and Insincere Arguing4
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation4
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation3
Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing3
Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments3
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues3
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction3
The Argument Scheme-based Approach to Argument Structure2
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent2
Gilbert as Disrupter2
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit2
Books Received 09-27-20242
Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory2
Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction2
Introduction to the Special Issue1
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons1
Introduction to the Special Issue1
Metaphorical Argumentation1
Books Received 45(1)1
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind1
Books Received1
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments1
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking1
Arguing About Arguing with Arguments1
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?1
In Memoriam Michael Scriven1
Notice of Books Received1
In Memoriam1
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments1
Books Recieved 44(4)1
Frustrated and Aware1
Navigating Argumentation1
Argumentative Bullshit1
John Hayden Woods 1937-20240
Arguing with Arguments0
On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy0
Group Identity in Public Deliberation0
Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?0
What Makes an Argument Strong?0
Is False Dilemma Really a Formal Fallacy?0
Notice of Books Received0
From the Editors0
Kisceral Argumentation in Law0
Amenable Argumentation Approach0
Notice of Books Received0
Burdens of Proposing0
Books Recieved0
Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?0
Credible as Evidence? Multilayered Audience Reception of Narrative Arguments0
Generative AI and Argument Creativity0
Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement0
An Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Metaphorical Ad Hominem Arguments0
When Meaning Becomes Controversial0
Notice of Books Received0
That Obscure Object of (Philosophical) Desire0
Arguments from Fairness and Extensive Interpretation in Greek Judicial Rhetoric0
Argument Evaluation: If your Snark be a Boojum…0
Books Received0
Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy0
On the Ethics of Real-Life Examples of Argument0
Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time0
An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes0
On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal0
How do Explanations Justify?0
A Simple Theory of Argument Schemes0
Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type0
Small but Significant Errata/Typos in the Paper “The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism”0
Are Fallacies Frequent ?0
Notice of Books Received0
Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?0
Reflections on Minimal Adversariality0
Inference Claims as Assertions0
Argumentation Profiles0
Particularism About Arguments0
Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate0
Reply to Yu and Zenker0
The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking0
Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education0
A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines0
Discovering Warrants in Political Argumentation0
Notice of Books Received0
Multi-Modal 20200
Is Every Definition Persuasive?0
Books Received0
Notice of Books Received0
Fact and Opinion0
Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation0
On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation0
You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure0
A Moderate Defense for Visual Arguments0
Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty0
Argumentation, Cooperation, and Disagreement0
In Memoriam J. Anthony Blair0
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments0
From the Editors0
Review of Review Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue By Marcin Lewiński and Mark Aakhus0
The Basic Components of Agreement0
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly0
A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions0
Does argumentation change minds?0
Books Received0
What are Deep Disagreements?0
Notice of Books Received0
The Relevance of Moral Emotional Appeals in Environmental Political Debates0
Act or Object0
In Memoriam0
Systemic Means of Persuasion and Argument Evaluation0
As Syllable from Sound0
0.047940015792847