Written Communication

Papers
(The TQCC of Written Communication is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-07-01 to 2024-07-01.)
ArticleCitations
Virtual Reality and Embodiment in Multimodal Meaning Making16
Writing Oneself Into the Curriculum: Photovoice Journaling in a Secondary Ethnic Studies Course16
Utilizing Peer Review and Revision in STEM to Support the Development of Conceptual Knowledge Through Writing14
Exploring Revisions in Academic Text: Closing the Gap Between Process and Product Approaches in Digital Writing12
A Reflexive Approach to Teaching Writing: Enablements and Constraints in Primary School Classrooms11
The Opioid Epidemic and the Pursuit of Moral Medicine: A Computational-Rhetorical Analysis8
Writing Toward a Decolonial Option: A Bilingual Student’s Multimodal Composing as a Site of Translingual Activism and Justice8
How to Build a Supercomputer: U.S. Research Infrastructure and the Documents That Mitigate the Uncertainties of Big Science7
Dead Reckoning: A Framework for Analyzing Positionality Statements in Ethnographic Research Reporting7
A Product- and Process-Oriented Tagset for Revisions in Writing7
Writing With Data: A Study of Coding on a Data-Journalism Team7
Time, the Written Record, and Professional Practice: The Case of Contemporary Social Work7
Gig Expectations: Literacy Practices, Events, and Texts in the Gig Economy6
Exploring General Versus Academic English Proficiency as Predictors of Adolescent EFL Essay Writing6
Restorying With the Ancestors: Historically Rooted Speculative Composing Practices and Alternative Rhetorics of Queer Futurity6
Examining Longitudinal and Concurrent Links Between Writing Motivation and Writing Quality in Middle School6
Are Two Voices Better Than One? Comparing Aspects of Text Quality and Authorial Voice in Paired and Independent L2 Writing6
Searching for Metacognitive Generalities: Areas of Convergence in Learning to Write for Publication Across Doctoral Students in Science and Engineering6
Addressing an Unfulfilled Expectation: Teaching Students With Disabilities to Write Scientific Arguments5
Writing Process Feedback Based on Keystroke Logging and Comparison With Exemplars: Effects on the Quality and Process of Synthesis Texts5
Changes in Research Abstracts: Past Tense, Third Person, Passive, and Negatives5
Historical Argumentation: Watching Historians and Teaching Youth5
Rethinking Translingualism in College Composition Classrooms: A Digital Ethnographic Study of Multilingual Students’ Written Communication Across Contexts4
Wreading on Online Literature Platforms4
The Construction of Value in Science Research Articles: A Quantitative Study of Topoi Used in Introductions4
Understandings of the Role of the One-to-One Writing Tutor in a U.K. University Writing Centre: Multiple Perspectives4
Lecturer, Language Tutor, and Student Perspectives on the Ethics of the Proofreading of Student Writing4
“Everything Is in the Lab Book”: Multimodal Writing, Activity, and Genre Analysis of Symbolic Mediation in Medical Physics4
Another Voice in the Room: Negotiating Authority in Multidisciplinary Writing Groups4
Writing Quality Predictive Modeling: Integrating Register-Related Factors4
“God’s Absence During Trauma Took Its Toll”: Dialogic Tracing of Literate Activity and Lifespan Trajectories of Semiotic (Un)becoming4
Embodied Genres, Typified Performances, and the Engineering Design Process4
Evidence Engines: Common Rhetorical Features of Fraudulent Academic Articles4
Conceptualizing Dialogic Literary Argumentation: Inviting Students to Take a Turn in Important Conversations4
Digital Documenting Practices: Collaborative Writing in Workplace Training4
0.03181791305542