Conflict Management and Peace Science

Papers
(The median citation count of Conflict Management and Peace Science is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
The MID5 Dataset, 2011–2014: Procedures, coding rules, and description42
US global military deployments, 1950–2020*14
Terrorism in armed conflict: new data attributing terrorism to rebel organizations13
Who’s prone to drone? A global time-series analysis of armed uninhabited aerial vehicle proliferation12
The Ethnic Stacking in Africa Dataset: When leaders use ascriptive identity to build military loyalty11
Arms transfers and international relations theory: Situating military aircraft sales in the broader IR context11
Hitting back or holding back in cyberspace: Experimental evidence regarding Americans’ responses to cyberattacks10
Female fighters and the fates of rebellions: How mobilizing women influences conflict duration9
Violence, non-violence and the conditional effect of repression on subsequent dissident mobilization8
Accountability and cyber conflict: examining institutional constraints on the use of cyber proxies7
{peacesciencer}: An R package for quantitative peace science research7
Fear of campaign violence and support for democracy and autocracy7
Ideological motives and taxation by armed groups6
Major power politics and non-violent resistance movements6
Economic legacy effects of armed conflict: Insights from the civil war in Aceh, Indonesia5
Beyond deterrence: Uncertain stability in the nuclear era5
Relative political capacity: A dataset to evaluate the performance of nations, 1960–20185
US aid and substitution of human rights violations5
The lesser evil? Experimental evidence on the strength of nuclear and chemical weapon “taboos”4
Rebel institutions and negotiated peace4
Revisiting the security–development nexus: Human security and the effects of IMF adjustment programmes4
Arming for conflict, arming for peace? How small arms imports affect intrastate conflict risk4
Why incumbents perpetrate election violence during civil war4
Donor political preferences and the allocation of aid: Patterns in recipient type4
Environmental shocks, civil conflict and aid effectiveness4
Crafting international apologies that work: A conjoint analysis approach3
To fight or demonstrate? Micro foundations of inequality and conflict3
School of influence: Human rights challenges in US foreign military training3
Can religious norms reduce violent attitudes? Experimental evidence from a Muslim–Christian conflict3
Sequencing United Nations peacemaking: Political initiatives and peacekeeping operations3
How leader's type shapes the effect of nuclear latency on dispute involvement3
Extended intergroup contact in frozen conflicts: Experimental evidence from Cyprus3
Financial contributions to United Nations peacekeeping, 1990–2010: A new dataset3
The duration of political imprisonment: Evidence from China3
Lethal aid and human security: The effects of US security assistance on civilian harm in low- and middle-income countries2
Higher education and violent revolutionary activism under authoritarianism: Subnational evidence from Iran2
Democratization as an impetus for peace talks in civil wars2
A certain gamble: Institutional change, leader turnover, and their effect on rivalry termination2
A perfect match? The dampening effect of interethnic marriage on armed conflict in Africa2
Secessionist conflict as diversion from inequality: The missing link between grievance and repression2
Female combatants and rebel group behaviour: Evidence from Nepal2
The problem with accidental war2
How civilian attitudes respond to the state’s violence: Lessons from the Israel–Gaza conflict1
Remittances, terrorism, and democracy1
Crisis bargaining, domestic politics and Russia's invasion of Ukraine1
Does transnational terrorism stimulate foreign assistance?1
Pro-government militias and civil war termination1
Political leaders and military spending1
Exogenous factors and the crisis bargaining process1
The effect of economic coercion on companies’ foreign direct investment decisions: Evidence from sanctions against Russia1
Private military and security companies and human rights abuses: The impact of CEOs’ military background1
Peace is in the air: Reducing conflict intensity with United Nations peacekeeping radio broadcasts1
States living in glasshouses …: Why fighting domestic insurgency changes how countries vote in the UN human rights council1
The bargaining framework and Russia's invasion of Ukraine1
Information problems and Russia's invasion of Ukraine1
Sticking it out: Instability, regime type, and personnel withdrawals from UN peacekeeping operations1
Violence, co-optation, and postwar voting in Guatemala1
Punishment and blame: How core beliefs affect support for the use of force in a nuclear crisis1
Preventive war and sovereign debt1
The harsh face of the empire by invitation: Coups in the US world order1
Introduction to special issue: New research on leaders and peace science1
Does a patron state's hardline posture reassure the public in an allied state?1
Fear, accessibility, and legitimacy: An examination of the effects of political violence on health security in Pakistan1
Airpower and territorial control: Unpacking the NATO intervention in Libya1
Insecure fisheries: How illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing affects piracy1
Commitment problems and Russia's invasion of Ukraine1
Guns and lightning: Power law distributions in intrastate conflict intensity dynamics1
Human rights organizations and transitional justice agenda-setting: Evidence from peace agreement provisions1
Trickledown politics: Do excluded ethnic groups benefit from non-violent national resistance campaigns?1
Economic crises, civilian mobilization, and repression in developing states1
Rugged terrain, forest coverage, and insurgency in Myanmar1
Trust, cooperation, and the tradeoffs of reciprocity1
Environmental pressures and pro-government militias: Evidence from the Philippines1
0.018105983734131