Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice

Papers
(The TQCC of Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Visualizing Distributions Across Grades92
Digital Module 31: Testing Accommodations for Students with Disabilities73
On the Cover: Turning the Page18
Blending Strategic Expertise and Technology: A Case Study for Practice Analysis16
11
ITEMS Corner Update: The Initial Steps in the ITEMS Development Process10
Issue Information10
Issue Cover9
ITEMS Corner Update: The New ITEMS Module Development Process8
Editorial8
Applying a Mixture Rasch Model‐Based Approach to Standard Setting8
Coconstructing a Meaningful Online Environment: Faculty–Student Rapport in the English as a Foreign Language College Classroom7
Item Selection Algorithm Based on Collaborative Filtering for Item Exposure Control7
How Did Students Engage with a Remote Educational Assessment? A Case Study7
Growth across Grades and Common Item Grade Alignment in Vertical Scaling Using the Rasch Model6
Evolving Educational Testing to Meet Students’ Needs: Design‐in‐Real‐Time Assessment6
On the Cover: Having Fun with Bubbles6
What Makes Measurement Important for Education?5
Issue Information5
Issue Information4
The Impact of the COVID‐19 Pandemic on American Board of Surgery's Oral Certifying Exams4
Issue Cover4
Digital Module 26: Content Alignment in Standards‐based Educational Assessment4
A Probabilistic Filtering Approach to Non‐Effortful Responding4
Commentary: A Data‐Driven Analysis of Recent Job Posts to Evaluate the Foundational Competencies4
Guesses and Slips as Proficiency‐Related Phenomena and Impacts on Parameter Invariance3
Commentary: Perspectives of Early Career Professionals on Enhancing Cultural Responsiveness in Educational Measurement3
Digital Module 28: Unusual Things That Usually Occur in a Credentialing Testing Program3
On the Cover: Network of Educational Measurement Articles3
The University of California Was Wrong to Abolish the SAT: Admissions When Affirmative Action Was Banned3
The 2024 EM:IP Cover Graphic/Data Visualization Competition3
Cheating Detection of Test Collusion: A Study on Machine Learning Techniques and Feature Representation3
3
An Investigation of the Nature and Consequence of the Relationship between IRT Difficulty and Discrimination2
Issue Information2
ITEMS Corner Update: High Traffic to the ITEMS Portal on the NCME Website2
Commentary: What Is the Breadth of “Educational Measurement?”2
An Evaluation of Automatic Item Generation: A Case Study of Weak Theory Approach2
Exploration of Latent Structure in Test Revision and Review Log Data2
ITEMS Corner Update: Recording Audio and Adding an Editorial Polish to an ITEMS Module2
ITEMS Corner ITEMS Portal Development Update https://ncme.elevate.commpartners.com2
Commentary: Past, Present, and Future of Educational Measurement2
Editorial2
Digital Module 36: Applying Intersectionality Theory to Educational Measurement2
Digital Module 34: Introduction to Multilevel Measurement Modeling2
Issue Cover2
ITEMS Corner Update: The Final Three Steps in the Development Process2
2
Development of a New Learning Progression Verification Method based on the Hierarchical Diagnostic Classification Model: Taking Grade 5 Students’ Fractional Operations as an Example2
Editorial2
Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement2
Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement: A Rejoinder2
Applications and Modeling of Keystroke Logs in Writing Assessments2
The Relationship between Item Developer Alignment of Items to Range Achievement‐Level Descriptors and Item Difficulty: Implications for Validating Intended Score Interpretations2
Changing Educational Assessments in the Post‐COVID‐19 Era: From Assessment of Learning (AoL) to Assessment as Learning (AaL)1
Issue Information1
Diving Into Students’ Transcripts: High School Course‐Taking Sequences and Postsecondary Enrollment1
1
1
Commentary: Achieving Educational Equity Requires a Communal Effort1
Issue Cover1
Instruction‐Tuned Large‐Language Models for Quality Control in Automatic Item Generation: A Feasibility Study1
Issue Cover1
Commentary: How Research and Testing Companies can Support Early‐Career Measurement Professionals1
Issue Information1
Issue Information1
Issue Cover1
Editorial1
On the Cover: Person Infit Density Contour1
You Win Some, You Lose Some1
Commentary: Restoring Public Trust1
Issue Cover1
Still Interested in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Modeling? Here Are Some Thoughts on How to Make It Work in Practice1
Ronald K. Hambleton (1943–2022): Setting the Standard for Measurement Excellence1
Validation as Evaluating Desired and Undesired Effects: Insights From Cross‐Classified Mixed Effects Model1
Investigating Approaches to Controlling Item Position Effects in Computerized Adaptive Tests1
Comparative Analysis of Psychometric Frameworks and Properties of Scores from Autogenerated Test Forms1
Current Psychometric Models and Some Uses of Technology in Educational Testing1
1
NCME Presidential Address 2021: Assessment Research and Practice in the Post‐COVID‐19 Era1
“Color‐Neutral” Is Not a Thing: Redefining Construct Definition and Representation through a Justice‐Oriented Critical Antiracist Lens1
Introduction to the Special Section “Issues and Practice in Applying Machine Learning in Educational Measurement”1
Digital Module 33: Fairness in Classroom Assessment: Dimensions and Tensions1
Clarifying the Terminology of Validity and the Investigative Stages of Validation1
1
AI: Can You Help Address This Issue?1
Commentary: The Questions We Should Be Asking About Socially Responsible College Admission Testing1
Issue Cover1
Transforming Assessment: The Impacts and Implications of Large Language Models and Generative AI1
Measurement Reflections1
What Should Psychometricians Know about the History of Testing and Testing Policy?1
Measuring Variability in Proctor Decision Making on High‐Stakes Assessments: Improving Test Security in the Digital Age1
Issue Information1
Supporting the Interpretive Validity of Student‐Level Claims in Science Assessment with Tiered Claim Structures1
0.0992591381073