OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Historiographia Linguistica is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-03-01 to 2024-03-01.)

Article	Citations
Expanding the comparative view	2
The Beginning of Quantitative Sociolinguistics in the Nineteenth Century	2
Une cause et ses raisons d’être Solution latine à un problème de terminologie arabe	2
The Linguistic Situation in the Parish of Aaby, Aarhus County	2
L’arabe algérien parmi les pères blancs	1
Les études basques comme sujet d’enquête	1
An ablative for the Greeks?	1
… and the Word was God: Missionary Linguistics and Missionary Grammar. Ed. by Even Hovdhaugen	1
L. V. Ščerba’s conception of language	1
On the four grades / four calls of Chinese rime tables	1
Erminnie A. Smith (1836–1886)	1
The Koernerian revolution	0
Compte rendu de Denecker, Desmet, Jooken, Lauwers, van Hal & van Rooy (2022): The Architecture of Grammar. Studies in Linguistic Historiography in Honor of Pierre Swiggers	0
	0
Three Cases of Plagiarism?	0
Lapsus et apposition de rectification de l’arabe	0
Review of McElvenny (2019): Gabelentz and the Science of Language	0
	0
Who Copied Whom?	0
Review of Benveniste, Coquet & Fenoglio (2019): Last Lectures. Collège de France 1968 and 1969	0
Revisions to the Siraya lexicon based on the original Utrecht Manuscript	0
Missionary linguistics in the East Indies in the seventeenth century	0
Review of De Palo & Gensini (2022): With Saussure, beyond Saussure. Between linguistics and philosophy of language	0
Compte rendu de Rey (2023): Léonard de Vinci, génie des langues	0
The Adaptation of Western and Chinese Categories to the Description of Manchu	0

Critique de Neveu & Roig (2022): L’œuvre de Lucien Tesnière. Lectures contemporaines	0
Une ‘grammaire’ des grammaires de la Renaissance	0
The ‘Brazilian Connection’ in the History of American Linguistics	0
The ghost of Vulgar Latin	0
Reception, translation and cultural context	0
The Pronunciation of German ch as Velar or Palatal from 1784 to 1841	0
Adelung’s English-German dictionary (1783, 1796)	0
Karl Tekusch (1890–1977), his concept of Sprachechtheit, and the purism movement in Austria	0
Review of Thomas (2020): Formalism and Functionalism in Linguistics. The Engineer and the Collector	0
The Place of Jakób Handel (1888–c.1942) in the History of Language Study in Poland	0
Review of Ringmacher, Tintemann, Klimp & Zimmer (2016): Wilhelm von Humboldt: Einleitende und vergleichende amerikanische Arbeiten	0
Review of Considine (2022): Sixteenth-Century English Dictionaries	0
Editors’ end-of-the-year notes	0
Review of Kilarski (2021): A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America	0
Review of Schöntag (2022): Das Verständnis von Vulgärlatein in der Frühen Neuzeit vor dem Hintergrund der questione della lingua. Eine Untersuchung zur Begriffsgeschichte im Rahmen der sozio- und var	0
Father Iakinf Bičurin’s theory of mental inflection in Chinese	0
A letter from Zellig Harris to André Lentin	0
The threefold aspect of linguistic phenomena and experiment in linguistics, *	0
Review of Imrényi & Mazziotta (2020): Chapters of Dependency Grammar. A historical survey from Antiquity to Tesnière	0
Review of Householder, Saporta & Adams (2022): Problems in Lexicography	0
Review of Hirschkop (2019): Linguistic Turns, 1890–1950: Writing on language as social theory	0
Review of Van Rooy, Van Hecke & Van Hal (2022): Trilingual Learning: The Study of Greek and Hebrew in a Latin World (1000–1700)	0
	0
Crisis in the Linguistic Society of America	0
Kritik über McElvenny (2023): The Limits of Structuralism. Forgotten Texts in the History of Modern Linguistics	0
Review of Joseph (2018): Language, Mind, and Body: A conceptual history	0
Diglossia and language ideology Petrarch on linguistic variation and differentiation	0
Innere Sprachform	0
Jan Ignacy Necisław Baudouin de Courtenay (1845–1929)	0
Editors’ notes	0
Review of Vincent (2020): Ferdinand de Saussure, Le premier cours de linguistique générale: La trilogie achevée	0
Kritik über Hübner & Simon (2021): Fremdsprachenlehrwerke in der Frühen Neuzeit. Perspektiven – Potentiale – Herausforderungen	0
Editors’ notes	0
From Mandarin to Cantonese Lexicography	0
The monolingual approach in American linguistic fieldwork	0
Compte rendu de Larcher (2021): L’invention de la luġa al-fuṣḥā: une histoire de l’arabe par les textes	0
Historiographia linguistica Folha de Estilo	0
	0
	0
	0
Otto Jespersen, one more broken leg in the historical stool of generative linguistics	0
Review of Estienne, Trudeau, Barataud, Colombat & Moreux (2020): La latinité injustement soupçonnée suivi de Dissertation sur la latinité de Plaute	0
Review of Koerner (2020): Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography	0
Bibliography of writings by E. F. Konrad Koerner	0
Kritik über Jäger & Kablitz (2023): Saussure et l’épistémè structuraliste. / Saussure und die strukturalistische Episteme	0
L’architecture des études de linguistique romane au XVIe siècle*	0
Compte rendu de Riemer (2021): L’emprise de la grammaire. Propositions épistémologiques pour une linguistique mineure	0
Review of Goldsmith & Laks (2019): Battle in the Mind Fields	0
Strukturalismus und kein Ende?*	0
Bibliographie linguistique de l’année 2016 et complément des années précédentes / Linguistic Bibliography for the Year 2016 and supplement for previous years	0

The first biolinguist?	0
Critique de Colombat & Lahaussois (2019): Histoire des parties du discours	0
Der Einfluss der akademischen Interaktionen auf die Auflagen- und Wirkungsgeschichte von Hermann PaulsPrinzipien	0
Review of Rundle (2022): The Routledge Handbook of Translation History	0
Glossing in the Linguistic Survey of India	0
Review of Lambert & Bonnet (2021): Apollonius Dyscole et Priscien: Transmettre, traduire, interpréter. Éléments d’une histoire problématique	0