OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Historiographia Linguistica is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)

Article	Citations
Review of Turton (2024): Before the Word was Queer: Sexuality and the English Dictionary, 1600–1930	2
The Linguistic Situation in the Parish of Aaby, Aarhus County	2
Misquoting the ancients	2
Interwoven processes in linguistic historiography	1
The Arte Sangley in the archives of the University of Santo Tomás in Manila	1
Kritik über McElvenny (2023): The Limits of Structuralism. Forgotten Texts in the History of Modern Linguistics	1
The Bocabulario de la Lengua Sangleya por las Letraz de el A.B.C. (Manila, ca. 1617)	1
Les études basques comme sujet d’enquête	1
Glossing in the Linguistic Survey of India	1
The Beginning of Quantitative Sociolinguistics in the Nineteenth Century	1
Historiographia linguistica Folha de Estilo	1
Editors’ notes	0
Jacques van Ginneken and Significs	0
Editors’ notes	0
Strukturalismus und kein Ende?*	0
Review of Considine (2022): Sixteenth-Century English Dictionaries	0
Editors’ notes	0
Compte rendu de Larcher (2021): L’invention de la luġa al-fuṣḥā: une histoire de l’arabe par les textes	0
Review of Kilarski (2021): A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America	0
From Mandarin to Cantonese Lexicography	0
Revisions to the Siraya lexicon based on the original Utrecht Manuscript	0
	0
L’architecture des études de linguistique romane au XVIe siècle*	0
	0
Who Copied Whom?	0

Mapping the world through lexicography	0
Review of McElvenny (2024): A History of Modern Linguistics: From the beginnings to World War II	0
… and the Word was God: Missionary Linguistics and Missionary Grammar. Ed. by Even Hovdhaugen	0
Anachronistic bias in the study of Arabic grammatical tradition	0
The history of Chinese linguistics in East and West	0
Jan Ignacy Necisław Baudouin de Courtenay (1845–1929)	0
Compte rendu de Rey (2023): Léonard de Vinci, génie des langues	0
Bibliography of writings by E. F. Konrad Koerner	0
Kritik über Hübner & Simon (2021): Fremdsprachenlehrwerke in der Frühen Neuzeit. Perspektiven – Potentiale – Herausforderungen	0
Review of Schöntag (2022): Das Verständnis von Vulgärlatein in der Frühen Neuzeit vor dem Hintergrund der questione della lingua. Eine Untersuchung zur Begriffsgeschichte im Rahmen der sozio- und var	0
“Este diccionario es su uso para leer libros”	0
The Dictionary of American Regional English and the idea of dialect	0
Review of Rundle (2022): The Routledge Handbook of Translation History	0
Review of De Palo & Gensini (2022): With Saussure, beyond Saussure. Between linguistics and philosophy of language	0
Review of Vincent (2020): Ferdinand de Saussure, Le premier cours de linguistique générale: La trilogie achevée	0
The Koernerian revolution	0
The Adaptation of Western and Chinese Categories to the Description of Manchu	0
The Place of Jakób Handel (1888–c.1942) in the History of Language Study in Poland	0
On the four grades / four calls of Chinese rime tables	0
Review of Van Rooy, Van Hecke & Van Hal (2022): Trilingual Learning: The Study of Greek and Hebrew in a Latin World (1000–1700)	0
Three Cases of Plagiarism?	0
Adelung’s English-German dictionary (1783, 1796)	0
Review of Wolff (2019): A history of African linguistics	0
The case of rén 仁 in early Chinese-European dictionaries	0
The ghost of Vulgar Latin	0
Review of Sartori & Binaghi (2022): The foundations of Arab linguistics V. Kitāb Sībawayhi, The Critical Theory.	0
	0
Missionary linguistics in the East Indies in the seventeenth century	0
Compte rendu de Bronckart & Bronckart (2022): Ferdinand de Saussure. Une science du langage pour une science de l’humain	0
The encounter of English and Chinese lexicographical traditions	0
The didactic features of James Summers’s (1828–1891) research on Chinese*	0
Compte rendu de Priscien (2023): Grammaire Livre VIII. Le verbe 1: Caractères généraux	0
Exploring Chinese compound words in the anonymous Breve compendio del vocabulario de compuestos en lengua mandarina and other Western missionary dictionaries	0
A seventeenth-century Portuguese Jesuit primer for the learning of Mandarin Chinese and two later versions	0
Review of Thomas (2020): Formalism and Functionalism in Linguistics. The Engineer and the Collector	0
Compte rendu de Denecker, Desmet, Jooken, Lauwers, van Hal & van Rooy (2022): The Architecture of Grammar. Studies in Linguistic Historiography in Honor of Pierre Swiggers	0
	0
Lapsus et apposition de rectification de l’arabe	0
The Περὶ ἀντιστοίχων in MS. Barocci 10 and MS. Barocci 48	0
Review of Aarssen, Genis & van der Veken (2018–2020)	0
Karl Tekusch (1890–1977), his concept of Sprachechtheit, and the purism movement in Austria	0
Critique de Neveu & Roig (2022): L’œuvre de Lucien Tesnière. Lectures contemporaines	0
Innere Sprachform	0
Kritik über Walker (2022): Wilhelm von Humboldt and Transcultural Communication in a Multicultural World: Translating Humanity	0
	0
The distributed invention of enunciation theory	0
	0
Otto Jespersen, one more broken leg in the historical stool of generative linguistics	0
L’arabe algérien parmi les pères blancs	0
Review of Cinato, Lahaussois & Whitman (2023): Glossing Practice: Comparative Perspectives	0

The Pronunciation of German ch as Velar or Palatal from 1784 to 1841	0
Aux origines du Cercle linguistique de New York	0
Review of Hirschkop (2019): Linguistic Turns, 1890–1950: Writing on language as social theory	0
Review of Imrényi & Mazziotta (2020): Chapters of Dependency Grammar. A historical survey from Antiquity to Tesnière	0
Review of Lambert & Bonnet (2021): Apollonius Dyscole et Priscien: Transmettre, traduire, interpréter. Éléments d’une histoire problématique	0
Erminnie A. Smith (1836–1886)	0
Review of Schöntag (2022): Das Verständnis von Vulgärlatein in der Frühen Neuzeit vor dem Hintergrund der questione della lingua. Eine Untersuchung zur Begriffsgeschichte im Rahmen der so	0
The first biolinguist?	0
Kritik über Jäger & Kablitz (2023): Saussure et l’épistémè structuraliste. / Saussure und die strukturalistische Episteme	0
New tools for understanding Hjelmslev*	0
Compte rendu de Riemer (2021): L’emprise de la grammaire. Propositions épistémologiques pour une linguistique mineure	0
The ‘Brazilian Connection’ in the History of American Linguistics	0
Review of Householder, Saporta & Adams (2022): Problems in Lexicography	0
Review of Ringmacher, Tintemann, Klimp & Zimmer (2016): Wilhelm von Humboldt: Einleitende und vergleichende amerikanische Arbeiten	0
Review of Estienne, Trudeau, Barataud, Colombat & Moreux (2020): La latinité injustement soupçonnée suivi de Dissertation sur la latinité de Plaute	0
Review of Bergounioux (2024): Les origines de la sémantique de Franz Bopp à Michel Bréal	0