International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Papers
(The median citation count of International Studies in the Philosophy of Science is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Ernest Nagel's Model of Reduction and Theory Change9
Is There a Reproducibility Crisis? On the Need for Evidence-based Approaches5
Darwinian-Selectionist Explanation, Radical Theory Change, and the Observable-Unobservable Dichotomy4
Incorrigible Science and Doctrinal Pseudoscience3
In Memoriam Elena Mamchur 8 July, 1935–14 December, 20233
Shaping Social Phenomena3
From Quantum Holism to the Disunity of Science and Social Activism: The Cat-Feyerabend Correspondence3
The Uses of Truth: Is There Room for Reconciliation of Factivist and Non-Factivist Accounts of Scientific Understanding?2
Problem-Feeding as a Model for Interdisciplinary Research2
Searching for Features with Artificial Neural Networks in Science: The Problem of Non-Uniqueness2
Kuhn's ‘The Natures of Conceptual Change’: the Search for a Theory of Meaning and the Birth of Taxonomies (1980–1994)2
Linguistic Discrimination in Science: Can English Disfluency Help Debias Scientific Research?2
Beyond Structure: New Frontiers of the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn2
Defending a Realist Stance2
Relational Primitivism About the Direction of Time2
Travelling Around Kuhn’s Worlds2
Navigating Massimi’s Perspectival Garden with Inferential Forking Paths2
Mathematical SETIbacks: Open Texture in Mathematics as a New Challenge for Messaging Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence1
Realism with Quantum Faces: The Leggett–Garg Inequalities as a Case Study for Feyerabend's Views1
Schlick and Popper on Causality and Quantum Physics: Origins and Perspectives of the Debate1
Feyerabend and the Philosophy of Physics, Part II1
Popper and Lakatos on what is distinctive about empirical science1
Reviewers AcknowledgementWe would like to acknowledge the great help we have received from our reviewers whose service to the profession and scholarship is invaluable. Their comments, suggestions, and1
Introduction1
Proportionality Contextualised1
The Paradox of Irrelevant Conjunction and a Bayesian Analysis of Pursuit Worthy Confirmation1
On the Elusive Formalisation of the Risky Condition for Hypothesis Testing1
The Curious Incident of Indistinguishable Selves A Reply to Nešić1
Race and Gender: Toward a Proper Pattern of Knowledge and Ignorance in Research1
Reviewers Acknowledgement0
William H. Newton-Smith (1943–2023)0
Tightrope-Walking Rationality in Action: Feyerabendian Insights for the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics0
Fake Research and Harmful Findings: Introduction to the Special Issue0
Fake Research: How Can We Recognise it and Respond to it?0
A Scientometric Approach to the Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: Entrenched Biomedical Standardisation and Citation-Exemplar0
From the Atom to Living Systems. A Chemical and Philosophical Journey into Modern and Contemporary Science0
Are There Experimental Arguments Independent of Theories? In Defense of a Hackingian Approach to the Scientific Realism Debate0
Feyerabend and the Philosophy of Physics0
The Normal and the Revolutionary: Kuhn’s Conversations with Rorty0
Rational Organicism—Goethe, Steiner, and the Intuitive Understanding of Plants and Animals0
Single Magnetic Northpoles and Southpoles and Their Importance for Science0
Non-Spacetime Quantum Gravity Theories and the Property Theory of Space0
Paul Feyerabend and the Dialectical Character of Quantum Mechanics: A Lesson in Philosophical Dadaism0
Are the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) Applicable in Determining the Optimal Fit and Simplicity of Mechanistic Models?0
Harmful Research and the Paradox of Credibility0
The Tools of Metaphysics and the Metaphysics of Science0
The Epistemology of Bio-Inspired Disciplines: Unpacking Modelling in Biorobotics0
What Exactly is Presupposed by Agnotology? The Challenge of Intentions0
Feyerabend on the Quantum Theory of Measurement: A Reassessment0
Failures of Scale Separation in Biology and the Problem of Inter-Level Causation0
Beyond Method: The Diatribe Between Feyerabend and Popper Over the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics0
A Conceptualisation of Irreversibility for Sustainable Development0
Some Explanatory Issues with Woodward’s Notion of Intervention0
Specialisation by Value Divergence: The Role of Epistemic Values in the Branching of Scientific Disciplines0
On the Harms of Agnotological Practices and How to Address Them0
A Philosopher Looks at Science0
Remapping Biology with Goethe, Schelling, and Herder. Romanticising Evolution0
Explanations by Constraint: Not Just in Physics0
A Defence of Functional Kinds: Multiple Realisability and Explanatory Counterfactuals0
Massive Modularity: An Ontological Hypothesis or an Adaptationist Discovery Heuristic?0
Scientific Realism and Laws of Nature. A Metaphysics of Causal Powers0
Einstein’s Theory of Theories and Mechanicism0
External Referees, 20240
Scientific Practices as Social Knowledge0
Regulation and the Normativity Problem0
Towards a Neutral-Structuralist Theory of Consciousness and Selfhood0
Natural Selection, Mechanism and Phenomenon0
Representation and Spacetime: The Hole Argument Revisited0
Getting it Wrong: Biological Mistake-Making as a Cross-System, Cross-Scale Phenomenon0
Good reasons, real questions and proper aims: Hasok Chang on the rationality of the chemical revolution0
Induction, Rationality, and the Realism/Anti-realism Debate: A Reply to Shech0
What is a Chemical Element? A Collection of Essays by Chemists, Philosophers, Historians, and Educators0
Reviewers Acknowledgement0
The Challenge of Quantum Mechanics to the Rationality of Science: Philosophers of Science on Bohr0
Kuhn’s World Change and Mathematical Intuitionism0
Scientific Realism and Blocking Strategies*0
Ehrenhaft’s Experiments on Magnetic Monopoles: Reconsidering the Feyerabend-Ehrenhaft Connection0
Bad Beliefs: Why They Happen to Good People0
0.090117931365967