Social Epistemology

Papers
(The TQCC of Social Epistemology is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
‘Building a Ship while Sailing It.’ Epistemic Humility and the Temporality of Non-knowledge in Political Decision-making on COVID-1929
Reflections on the (Post-)Human Condition: Towards New Forms of Engagement with the World?23
Epistemic Injustice and Indigenous Peoples in the Inter-American Human Rights System17
“Do Your Own Research”14
AAC Technology, Autism, and the Empathic Turn13
An Epistemological Conception of Safe Spaces12
Anticipatory Epistemic Injustice12
Echo Chambers, Ignorance and Domination12
In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility11
What Does It Mean for a Conspiracy Theory to Be a ‘Theory’?11
Knowledge, Expertise and Science Advice During COVID-19: In Search of Epistemic Justice for the ‘Wicked’ Problems of Post-Normal Times11
Critical Realism: A Critical Evaluation11
Fake News vs. Echo Chambers11
Are ‘Conspiracy Theories’ So Unlikely to Be True? A Critique of Quassim Cassam’s Concept of ‘Conspiracy Theories’11
Agential Epistemic Injustice and Collective Epistemic Resistance in the Criminal Justice System11
The Institutional Preconditions of Epistemic Justice11
Rethinking the Just Intelligence Theory of National Security Intelligence Collection and Analysis: The Principles of Discrimination, Necessity, Proportionality and Reciprocity10
Promoting Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration: A Systematic Review, a Critical Literature Review, and a Pathway Forward9
Status Distrust of Scientific Experts9
Some Conspiracy Theories8
Stereotyping as Discrimination: Why Thoughts Can Be Discriminatory8
The Powers of Individual and Collective Intellectual Self-Trust in Dealing with Epistemic Injustice8
Epistemic Injustice in Late-Stage Dementia: A Case for Non-Verbal Testimonial Injustice7
Genocide Denial as Testimonial Oppression7
Lessons from Reckwitz and Rosa: Towards a Constructive Dialogue between Critical Analytics and Critical Theory7
Collaboration in Grant Proposals and Assessments in Ageing Research – Justification or a Quest for a Collaborology?7
Epistemic Autonomy and Intellectual Humility: Mutually Supporting Virtues7
Why Trust Raoult? How Social Indicators Inform the Reputations of Experts7
Expertise in Non-Well-Defined Task Domains: The Case of Reading6
Who’s to Blame? Hermeneutical Misfire, Forward-Looking Responsibility, and Collective Accountability6
Multiplying Ignorance, Deferring Action: Dynamics in the Communication of Knowledge and Non-Knowledge5
The Future of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theory: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Conspiracy Theory Theory5
Denial of Japan’s Military Sexual Slavery and Responsibility for Epistemic Amends5
An Epistemic Problem for Epistocracy5
Epistemic Injusticefrom Afar: Rethinking the Denial of Armenian Genocide5
Knowledge, Power, and the Search for Epistemic Liberation in Africa5
Who is a Conspiracy Theorist?5
Epistemic Injustice and Collective Wrongdoing: Introduction to Special Issue5
Trust, Vaccine Hesitancy, and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Perspective5
Lookism as Epistemic Injustice5
Perceiving Environmental Science, Risk and Industry Regulation in the Mediatised Vicious Cycles of the Tasmanian Salmon Aquaculture Industry5
Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories5
Silencing by Not Telling: Testimonial Void as a New Kind of Testimonial Injustice5
Diving Deeper into the Concept of ‘Cultural Heritage’ and Its Relationship with Epistemic Diversity5
Epistemic Responsibility, Rights and Duties During the COVID-19 Pandemic5
Blockchain Imaginaries and Their Metaphors: Organising Principles in Decentralised Digital Technologies5
Alethic Rights: Preliminaries of an Inquiry into the Power of Truth5
The ‘Epistemic Critique’ of Epistocracy and Its Inadequacy5
Epistemology and the Pandemic: Lessons from an Epistemic Crisis4
Strengthening the Epistemic Case against Epistocracy and for Democracy4
Knowledge Brokers in Crisis: Public Communication of Science During the COVID-19 Pandemic4
A Quasi-Fideist Approach to QAnon4
Becoming a Knower: Fabricating Knowing Through Coaction4
Is There a New Conspiracism?4
To Be Scientific Is To Be Communist4
Epistemic Bunkers4
The Possibility of Epistemic Nudging4
The Applied Epistemology of Official Stories4
On the Coercive Nature of Research Impact Metrics: The Case Study of Altmetrics and Science Communication4
Explorations about the Family’s Role in the German Transplantation System: Epistemic Opacity and Discursive Exclusion4
Policy Styles and Epistemic Policies in the Regulation of Health Claims. A Comparison of Europe, the United States, and Japan3
Nudging Humans3
Can the Excluded Criticize? On the (Im)possibilities of Formulating and Understanding Critique3
Is It Conspiracy or ‘Truth’? Examining the Legitimation of the 5G Conspiracy Theory during the Covid-19 Pandemic3
Social Exclusion, Epistemic Injustice, and Intellectual Self-Trust3
Three Decades of Social Construction of Technology: Dynamic Yet Fuzzy? The Methodological Conundrum3
Defining Wokeness3
Online Illusions of Understanding3
Science Advice in an Environment of Trust: Trusted, but Not Trustworthy?3
‘Conspiracy Theory’ as a Tonkish Term: Some Runabout Inference-Tickets from Truth to Falsehood3
Regulating Social Media as a Public Good: Limiting Epistemic Segregation3
Deliberative Stakeholder Engagement in Person-centered Health Research3
Judging Expert Trustworthiness: The Difference Between Believing and Following the Science3
Relationally Responsive Expert Trustworthiness3
Consuming Fake News: Can We Do Any Better?3
”That’s Just a Conspiracy Theory!”: Relevant Alternatives, Dismissive Conversational Exercitives, and the Problem of Premature Conclusions3
Reclaiming Control: Extended Mindreading and the Tracking of Digital Footprints3
Self-Trust and Critical Thinking Online: A Relational Account3
Intra-Group Epistemic Injustice3
0.04182505607605