Social Epistemology

Papers
(The TQCC of Social Epistemology is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-09-01 to 2024-09-01.)
ArticleCitations
‘Building a Ship while Sailing It.’ Epistemic Humility and the Temporality of Non-knowledge in Political Decision-making on COVID-1929
Reflections on the (Post-)Human Condition: Towards New Forms of Engagement with the World?23
Epistemic Injustice and Indigenous Peoples in the Inter-American Human Rights System16
AAC Technology, Autism, and the Empathic Turn13
“Do Your Own Research”13
Anticipatory Epistemic Injustice12
Echo Chambers, Ignorance and Domination12
An Epistemological Conception of Safe Spaces12
Critical Realism: A Critical Evaluation11
The Institutional Preconditions of Epistemic Justice11
Are ‘Conspiracy Theories’ So Unlikely to Be True? A Critique of Quassim Cassam’s Concept of ‘Conspiracy Theories’11
Agential Epistemic Injustice and Collective Epistemic Resistance in the Criminal Justice System11
What Does It Mean for a Conspiracy Theory to Be a ‘Theory’?11
Fake News vs. Echo Chambers11
Knowledge, Expertise and Science Advice During COVID-19: In Search of Epistemic Justice for the ‘Wicked’ Problems of Post-Normal Times11
In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility10
Rethinking the Just Intelligence Theory of National Security Intelligence Collection and Analysis: The Principles of Discrimination, Necessity, Proportionality and Reciprocity10
Promoting Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration: A Systematic Review, a Critical Literature Review, and a Pathway Forward9
Online Intellectual Virtues and the Extended Mind9
Status Distrust of Scientific Experts9
Some Conspiracy Theories8
The Powers of Individual and Collective Intellectual Self-Trust in Dealing with Epistemic Injustice8
Why Trust Raoult? How Social Indicators Inform the Reputations of Experts7
Collaboration in Grant Proposals and Assessments in Ageing Research – Justification or a Quest for a Collaborology?7
Genocide Denial as Testimonial Oppression7
Stereotyping as Discrimination: Why Thoughts Can Be Discriminatory7
Epistemic Injustice in Late-Stage Dementia: A Case for Non-Verbal Testimonial Injustice7
Lessons from Reckwitz and Rosa: Towards a Constructive Dialogue between Critical Analytics and Critical Theory7
Who’s to Blame? Hermeneutical Misfire, Forward-Looking Responsibility, and Collective Accountability6
Expertise in Non-Well-Defined Task Domains: The Case of Reading6
Silencing by Not Telling: Testimonial Void as a New Kind of Testimonial Injustice5
Diving Deeper into the Concept of ‘Cultural Heritage’ and Its Relationship with Epistemic Diversity5
Trust, Vaccine Hesitancy, and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Perspective5
An Epistemic Problem for Epistocracy5
Epistemic Injusticefrom Afar: Rethinking the Denial of Armenian Genocide5
Knowledge, Power, and the Search for Epistemic Liberation in Africa5
Who is a Conspiracy Theorist?5
Epistemic Autonomy and Intellectual Humility: Mutually Supporting Virtues5
Denial of Japan’s Military Sexual Slavery and Responsibility for Epistemic Amends5
Lookism as Epistemic Injustice5
Alethic Rights: Preliminaries of an Inquiry into the Power of Truth5
Perceiving Environmental Science, Risk and Industry Regulation in the Mediatised Vicious Cycles of the Tasmanian Salmon Aquaculture Industry5
Epistemic Injustice and Collective Wrongdoing: Introduction to Special Issue5
The Future of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theory: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Conspiracy Theory Theory5
Epistemic Responsibility, Rights and Duties During the COVID-19 Pandemic5
Blockchain Imaginaries and Their Metaphors: Organising Principles in Decentralised Digital Technologies5
Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories5
The Applied Epistemology of Official Stories4
On the Coercive Nature of Research Impact Metrics: The Case Study of Altmetrics and Science Communication4
The Gene-Edited Babies Controversy in China: Field Philosophical Questioning4
Becoming a Knower: Fabricating Knowing Through Coaction4
Multiplying Ignorance, Deferring Action: Dynamics in the Communication of Knowledge and Non-Knowledge4
Knowledge Brokers in Crisis: Public Communication of Science During the COVID-19 Pandemic4
A Quasi-Fideist Approach to QAnon4
The ‘Epistemic Critique’ of Epistocracy and Its Inadequacy4
Is There a New Conspiracism?4
Strengthening the Epistemic Case against Epistocracy and for Democracy4
Explorations about the Family’s Role in the German Transplantation System: Epistemic Opacity and Discursive Exclusion4
Epistemology and the Pandemic: Lessons from an Epistemic Crisis4
The Possibility of Epistemic Nudging4
0.13920903205872