Social Epistemology

Papers
(The TQCC of Social Epistemology is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-02-01 to 2025-02-01.)
ArticleCitations
ChatGPT, Education, and Understanding29
Hysteria, Hermeneutical Injustice and Conceptual Engineering23
The Elusiveness of Hermeneutic Injustice in Psychiatric Categorizations14
Cringe13
On Aesth-ethic Activism as Epistemic Resistance in Conversation with José Medina13
Intra-Group Epistemic Injustice: Jewish Identity, Whiteness, and Zionism12
A Contemporary Marxist Critique of Neoliberal Capitalism: Beyond Revolution and Neo-Keynesianism11
The Philosophy of Epistemic Autonomy: Introduction to Special Issue11
Towards a Capabilities-Based Conception of Distributive Epistemic Justice11
We Have No Satisfactory Social Epistemology of AI-Based Science11
Reflexive Research Practice in Women’s Prison Research in Uganda11
The Possibility of Epistemic Nudging11
Why Human Prejudice is so Persistent: A Predictive Coding Analysis11
AI-Testimony, Conversational AIs and Our Anthropocentric Theory of Testimony10
Mechanistic Explanation, Interdisciplinary Integration and Interpersonal Social Coordination9
Three Decades of Social Construction of Technology: Dynamic Yet Fuzzy? The Methodological Conundrum9
Why Post-Truth Cannot Be Our Epistemological Compass9
Anticipatory Epistemic Injustice8
The Emergence of Urban Studies as an Academic Field: Article and Journal Level Assessment of Its Development and Openness8
Bots: Some Less-Considered Epistemic Problems7
Stereotyping as Discrimination: Why Thoughts Can Be Discriminatory7
Intra-Group Epistemic Injustice7
Truth as Force: A Materialist Picture7
The Normative Turn in Conspiracy Theory Theory?7
Machine Advisors: Integrating Large Language Models Into Democratic Assemblies6
Are ‘Conspiracy Theories’ So Unlikely to Be True? A Critique of Quassim Cassam’s Concept of ‘Conspiracy Theories’6
Judging Expert Trustworthiness: The Difference Between Believing and Following the Science6
Scientific Misinformation and Fake News: A Blurred Boundary5
Designing an Expert-Setting for Interdisciplinary Dialogue: Literary Texts as Boundary Objects5
Life, Mind and Matter: Chemistry for an Ecological Era5
Collaboration in Grant Proposals and Assessments in Ageing Research – Justification or a Quest for a Collaborology?5
The Pitfalls of Epistemic Autonomy without Intellectual Humility5
The Contribution of Logic to Epistemic Injustice5
Becoming a Knower: Fabricating Knowing Through Coaction5
Conceptualizing Scientific Progress Needs a New Humanism5
Chameleonism Revisited: Imposters, Hypocrites, and Passing5
Correction5
The Epistemic Value of Democratic Meritocracy5
Vices of Distrust5
The ‘Epistemic Critique’ of Epistocracy and Its Inadequacy5
Epistemic Smothering is Not a Form of Epistemic Paternalism5
Knowledge-Production, Digitalization and the Appropriation of Surplus-Knowledge5
A Philosophical Explanation for the Islamization of Philosophy: How Can Mullā Ṣadrā’s Transcendent Philosophy Contribute to the Islamization of Philosophy in Iran?4
Knowledge, Power, and the Search for Epistemic Liberation in Africa4
Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories4
‘Here’s Me Being Humble’: The Strangeness of Modeling Intellectual Humility4
How Can Constitutivism Account for the Persistence of Deep Disagreements?4
Social Exclusion, Epistemic Injustice, and Intellectual Self-Trust4
Virtue Signalling to Signal Trustworthiness, Avoid Distrust, and Scaffold Self-Trust4
Is Philosophy Exceptional? A Corpus-Based, Quantitative Study4
Scientism and the Problem of Self-Referential Incoherence4
Deliberative Stakeholder Engagement in Person-centered Health Research4
Regulating Social Media as a Public Good: Limiting Epistemic Segregation4
Mapping the Dynamics of the Vertical Farm: A Biopolitical Epistemology of Valuation3
Linguistic Hermeneutical Injustice3
Some Conspiracy Theories3
Friend or Foe? Rethinking Epistemic Trespassing3
The Exclusion Problem in Preclinical Studies: A Case of Epistemic Injustice?3
The Problem of Disinformation: A Critical Approach3
Artificial Epistemic Authorities3
Alethic Rights: Preliminaries of an Inquiry into the Power of Truth3
Introduction to the Special Issue: “Expertise, Semiotics and Interactivity”3
‘Blackness’, the Body and Epistemological and Epistemic Traps: A Phenomenological Analysis3
Hijacking the Postmodern Project: Post-Truth and the Need to De-politicize Epistemological Dispute3
How Expertise is Enabled: Why Epistemic Cycles Matter to us All3
The Evolutionary Dimension of Scientific Progress3
Self-Trust and Critical Thinking Online: A Relational Account3
The University As Infrastructure of Becoming: Re-Activating Academic Freedom Through Humility in Times of Radical Uncertainty3
On the Inconsistency between Practice and Reporting in Science: The Genesis of Scientific Articles3
Knowledge, Expertise and Science Advice During COVID-19: In Search of Epistemic Justice for the ‘Wicked’ Problems of Post-Normal Times3
Epistemic Hubris3
0.048256158828735