Social Epistemology

Papers
(The TQCC of Social Epistemology is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-10-01 to 2025-10-01.)
ArticleCitations
Conceptualizing Scientific Progress Needs a New Humanism38
Stop Calling It ‘Revenge Porn’. Hermeneutical Injustice in Image-Based Sexual Abuse36
Reflexive Research Practice in Women’s Prison Research in Uganda26
Mind-Technology Problems for Know-How Anti-Intellectualism20
The Philosophy of Epistemic Autonomy: Introduction to Special Issue17
Generative AI, Quadruple Deception & Trust16
Hinge Epistemology: Why Choose?16
ChatGPT, Education, and Understanding15
Mechanistic Explanation, Interdisciplinary Integration and Interpersonal Social Coordination14
Cringe14
The Epistemic Value of Democratic Meritocracy13
Towards a Capabilities-Based Conception of Distributive Epistemic Justice13
Epistemology and the Pandemic: Lessons from an Epistemic Crisis12
Knowledge-Production, Digitalization and the Appropriation of Surplus-Knowledge11
Epistemic Hubris11
Epistemic Paternalism and Protective Authority in a Non-Ideal World11
Misplaced Trust in Expertise: Pseudo-Experts and Unreliable Experts10
On the Inconsistency between Practice and Reporting in Science: The Genesis of Scientific Articles10
Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories10
Climate Change and Culpable Ignorance: The Case of Pseudoscience9
Lookism as Epistemic Injustice9
“Do Your Own Research”9
Epistemic Domination and ‘Gender Identity Fraud’ Prosecutions9
Challenging Prejudice as the Necessary Condition for Testimonial Injustice: Unveiling the Role of Epistemic Vice9
AI and Epistemic Agency: How AI Influences Belief Revision and Its Normative Implications8
Fake Authority Country: Epistemic Responsibility and the Normativity of Expertise8
The Transmission of Knowledge via Large-Scale Technology: A Shared Agency Account8
Credibility Trouble: When ‘I Believe You’ is an Epistemic Wrong8
Stability in Liberal Epistocracies7
Normative Paradigms and Interdisciplinary Research7
The Wrong of Bullshit7
Do Political Convictions Infect Every Fibre of Our Being?7
Epistemic Caring: An Ethical Approach for the Co-Constitution of Knowledge in Participatory Research Practice7
To Be Scientific Is To Be Communist7
Beyond ‘Infodemic’: Complexity, Knowledge and Populism in COVID-19 Crisis Governance7
Human-Data Coupling: Informational Personhood & Artificial Intelligence Through Gilbert Simondon’s Philosophy of Technology7
Institutional Epistemic Isolation in Psychiatric Healthcare6
In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility6
AI-Extended Moral Agency?6
Conspiracy Theories, Scepticism, and Non-Liberal Politics6
The Testimonial Double Bind for Disabled People6
How to Fight Linguistic Injustice in Science: Equity Measures and Mitigating Agents6
Costly Displays in a Digital World: Signalling Trustworthiness on Social Media6
Exclusion, Engagement, and Empathy: Revisiting Public Discourse from a Communication Perspective6
The Insertion of Islamic Psychology as a Decolonial Epistemological Proposal in the Field of Psychology6
‘Here’s Me Being Humble’: The Strangeness of Modeling Intellectual Humility5
How Expertise is Enabled: Why Epistemic Cycles Matter to us All5
Softness: An Ecological Paradigm for Embodied Technological Intelligence5
Smart Environments5
The Emergence of Urban Studies as an Academic Field: Article and Journal Level Assessment of Its Development and Openness5
How Can Constitutivism Account for the Persistence of Deep Disagreements?5
Epistemic Distance and Antidemocratic Conspiracy Theories5
Flexible or Rigid? A Functionalist Approach to Epistemic Standards5
Intra-Group Epistemic Injustice5
Scientific Misinformation and Fake News: A Blurred Boundary5
Friend or Foe? Rethinking Epistemic Trespassing5
Epistemic Smothering is Not a Form of Epistemic Paternalism5
Defining Wokeness5
The Influence of Disciplinary Origins on Peer Review Normativities in a New Discipline5
Designing an Expert-Setting for Interdisciplinary Dialogue: Literary Texts as Boundary Objects5
The Problem of Disinformation: A Critical Approach4
The Gap Between Science and Society and the Intrinsically Capitalistic Character of Science Communication4
Epistemic Inclusion as the Key to Benefiting from Cognitive Diversity in Science4
Institutions of Epistemic Vigilance: The Case of the Newspaper Press4
Towards a Conceptual Framework for Conspiracy Theory Theories4
What Composition of High-Energy Physics Collaborations is Epistemically Optimal?4
The Charisma of Reason during the Re-enchantment of the World4
Two Ways of Seeing Post-Truth as a Stance4
Language in the Godless Age of AI4
The Social Indicators of the Reputation of an Expert4
Conspiracy Theory and (or as) Folk Psychology4
When Patient Voices Get Lost in Evidence Hierarchies: A Testimony of Rare Adverse Events and Participatory Epistemic Injustice in Drug Safety Monitoring4
Taming Human Subjects: Researchers’ Strategies for Coping with Vagaries in Social Science Experiments4
0.029126882553101