Managerial Auditing Journal

Papers
(The H4-Index of Managerial Auditing Journal is 19. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-07-01 to 2024-07-01.)
ArticleCitations
Guest editorial: The COVID-19 pandemic: a catalyst for digital transformation54
CEO characteristics and bank performance: evidence from India48
CEO power and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure: does stakeholder influence matter?44
Consequences of the implementation of expanded audit reports with key audit matters (KAMs) on audit quality41
The affiliations and characteristics of female directors and earnings management: evidence from Turkey35
Key audit risks and audit procedures during the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of audit reports 2019-202034
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on earnings management and the value relevance of earnings: US evidence32
The perceived impact of the KAM reforms on audit reports, audit quality and auditor work practices: stakeholders’ perspectives31
Research patterns and intellectual structure of Managerial Auditing Journal: a retrospective using bibliometric analysis during 1986-201928
Gender diversity in audit committees and audit fees: evidence from China27
Female CEO succession and audit fees: evidence from China27
Whistleblowing by auditors: the role of professional commitment and independence commitment24
Do key audit matters (KAMs) matter? Auditors’ perceptions of KAMs and audit quality in Finland23
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on auditors’ responsibility: evidence from European listed companies on key audit matters22
Audit quality and COVID-19 restrictions22
How do the current auditing standards fit the emergent use of blockchain?22
Earnings management and investor protection during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from G-12 countries21
Audit committee characteristics and bank performance: evidence from India20
The effect of audit of outgoing leading officials’ natural resource accountability on environmental governance: evidence from China20
0.029623031616211