Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Papers
(The median citation count of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-03-01 to 2024-03-01.)
ArticleCitations
The power of internal feedback: exploiting natural comparison processes112
Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: a literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching91
Unfolding collaborative learning assessment literacy: a reflection on current assessment methods in higher education59
What feedback literate teachers do: an empirically-derived competency framework57
Assignment outsourcing: moving beyond contract cheating53
Formative assessment as practice: the role of students’ motivation51
Authentic feedback: supporting learners to engage in disciplinary feedback practices45
The effectiveness of formative assessment: student views and staff reflections43
Contract cheating in higher education: a systematic literature review and future research agenda38
Students’ perceptions of, and emotional responses to, personalised learning analytics-based feedback: an exploratory study of four courses37
Student agency in feedback: beyond the individual35
Student wellbeing and assessment in higher education: the balancing act34
Evaluating the link between attendance and performance in higher education: the role of classroom engagement dimensions33
From feedback-as-information to feedback-as-process: a linguistic analysis of the feedback literature33
Self-assessment is about more than self: the enabling role of feedback literacy32
‘Mess, stress and trauma’: students’ experiences of formal contract cheating processes30
Insights into how academics reframed their assessment during a pandemic: disciplinary variation and assessment as afterthought30
Collaborative peer feedback and learning analytics: theory-oriented design for supporting class-wide interventions28
Educators’ perceptions of responsibility-sharing in feedback processes28
What can higher education learn from feedback seeking behaviour in organisations? Implications for feedback literacy27
Online learning and assessment during the Covid-19 pandemic: exploring the impact on undergraduate student well-being26
Attitudes and understanding are only part of the story: self-control, age and self-imposed pressure predict plagiarism over and above perceptions of seriousness and understanding26
Giving genre-based peer feedback in academic writing: sources of knowledge and skills, difficulties and challenges25
Making peer feedback work: the contribution of technology-mediated dialogic peer feedback to feedback uptake and literacy25
Students cheat more often from those known to them: situation matters more than the individual25
A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback: a theoretical framework24
Exploring teacher perceptions of different types of ‘feedback practices’ in higher education: implications for teacher feedback literacy24
A four-dimensional conceptual framework for student assessment literacy in holistic competency development24
Making internal feedback explicit: exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review23
An analysis of teamwork based on self and peer evaluation in higher education23
Developing student feedback literacy through self and peer assessment interventions23
The student evaluation of teaching and likability: what the evaluations actually measure23
Effects of personalised feedback approach on knowledge building, emotions, co-regulated behavioural patterns and cognitive load in online collaborative learning23
Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research22
The quality of assessment tasks as a determinant of learning21
Contract cheating: To legislate or not to legislate - is that the question?20
Supervisory feedback across disciplines: does it meet students’ expectations?20
“Check the grade, log out”: students’ engagement with feedback in learning management systems20
What matters in design? Cultivating undergraduates’ critical thinking through online peer assessment in a Confucian heritage context19
Feedback cultures, histories and literacies: international postgraduate students’ experiences19
Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale18
Exploring the notion of teacher feedback literacies through the theory of practice architectures18
Supervisory feedback to postgraduate research students: a literature review18
Will artificial intelligence revolutionise the student evaluation of teaching? A big data study of 1.6 million student reviews18
Development and validation of an instrument measuring undergraduate students’ perceived holistic competencies18
Can professors buy better evaluation with lenient grading? The effect of grade inflation on student evaluation of teaching18
Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: a look inside the black box18
A dialogic technology-mediated model of feedback uptake and literacy18
What constitutes high quality higher education pedagogical research?17
Students’ perceptions of and learning practices in online timed take-home examinations during Covid-1917
Defining and measuring authentic assessment: a case study in the context of tertiary science17
The effect of self-assessment on academic performance and the role of explicitness: a meta-analysis17
First-year academic achievement: the role of academic self-efficacy, self-regulated learning and beyond classroom engagement16
Student feedback literacy in L2 disciplinary writing: insights from international graduate students at a UK university16
Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback16
Designing assessment in a digital world: an organising framework16
A systematic review of the educational uses and effects of exemplars15
The impact of content co-creation on academic achievement15
Promoting student engagement with feedback: insights from collaborative pedagogy and teacher feedback15
Appearance, insults, allegations, blame and threats: an analysis of anonymous non-constructive student evaluation of teaching in Australia15
Feedback behaviour and preference in university academic English courses: associations with English language self-efficacy15
Supporting student and teacher feedback literacy: an instructional model for student feedback processes15
The assessment arms race and the evolution of a university’s assessment practices14
The impact of disadvantage on higher education engagement during different delivery modes: a pre- versus peri-pandemic comparison of learning analytics data13
University students’ negative emotions in a computer-based examination: the roles of trait test-emotion, prior test-taking methods and gender13
The effects of rubrics on evaluative judgement: a randomised controlled experiment13
How self-efficacy beliefs are related to assessment practices: a study of experienced university teachers13
Grade inflation versus grade improvement: Are our students getting more intelligent?12
Student perspectives on assessment: connections between self and society12
Researching student agency in digital education as if the social aspects matter: students’ experience of participatory dimensions of online peer assessment12
Investigating the impact of increased student feedback literacy level on their expectations on university teachers’ feedback12
Developing the relational in teacher feedback literacy: exploring feedback talk12
Beyond satisfaction scores: visualising student comments for whole-of-course evaluation12
Designing the digital in authentic assessment: is it fit for purpose?12
Student perceptions of student evaluations: enabling student voice and meaningful engagement12
Self-assessment complements peer assessment for undergraduate students in an academic writing task12
When academic integrity rules should not apply: a survey of academic staff12
Online peer feedback on video presentations: type of feedback and improvement of presentation skills11
Signature feedback practices in the creative arts: integrating feedback within the curriculum11
Which are the predictors of perceived employability? An approach based on three studies11
Can students’ feedback literacy be improved? A scoping review of interventions11
Feedforward practices: a systematic review of the literature11
How is theory used in assessment and feedback research? A critical review10
Designing learner-centred text-based feedback: a rapid review and qualitative synthesis10
Spanish contract cheating website marketing through search engine advertisements10
A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors10
Stimulating higher education students to use online formative assessments: the case of two mid-term take-home tests10
Navigating assessed coursework to build and validate professional identities: the experiences of fifteen international students in the UK10
Does quality work work? A systematic review of academic literature on quality initiatives in higher education10
Exploring internal structure of a performance-based critical thinking assessment for new students in higher education10
A mixed blessing: student engagement in emergency online learning during COVID-19 in China9
The factor structure of the peer-feedback orientation scale (PFOS): toward a measure for assessing students’ peer-feedback dispositions9
Knowing me, knowing you: the effects of peer familiarity on receiving peer feedback for undergraduate student writers9
Discrimination against academics and career implications of student evaluations: university policy versus legal compliance9
Empirical investigation of authentic assessment theory: An application in online courses using mimetic simulation created in university learning management ecosystems9
Benchmarking Australian enabling programmes: assuring quality, comparability and transparency9
Learner engagement with written corrective feedback in ESL and EFL contexts: a qualitative research synthesis using a perception-based framework9
Stress, distress, disorder and coping: the impact of anonymous student evaluation of teaching on the health of higher education teachers9
How conceptualising respect can inform feedback pedagogies9
Bifactor modelling of the psychological constructs of learner feedback literacy: conceptions of feedback, feedback trust and self-efficacy9
Theorising how teachers manage the use of exemplars: towards mediated learning from exemplars9
Hello GPT! Goodbye home examination? An exploratory study of AI chatbots impact on university teachers’ assessment practices8
A challenge in teaching scientific communication: academic experience does not improve undergraduates’ ability to assess their or their peers’ writing8
Making internal feedback explicit: harnessing the comparisons students make during two-stage exams8
How university EFL writers’ beliefs in writing ability impact their perceptions of peer assessment: perspectives from implicit theories of intelligence8
Academic research evaluation in artistic disciplines: the case of Poland8
What is unique about high performing students? Exploring personality, motivation and competitiveness8
How does the medium affect the message? Architecture students’ perceptions of the relative utility of different feedback methods8
Enhancing graduate employability skills and student engagement through group video assessment8
Unlocking the potential of broad, horizontal curricular assessments for ethics, responsibility and sustainability in business and economics higher education8
Navigating feedback practices across learning contexts: implications for feedback literacy8
A four-dimensional framework for teacher assessment literacy in holistic competencies8
Conceptualising evaluative judgement in the context of holistic competency development: results of a Delphi study7
Assessing students’ peer feedback literacy in writing: scale development and validation7
Playing the SET game: how teachers view the impact of student evaluation on the experience of teaching and learning7
Quantifying halo effects in students’ evaluation of teaching7
Observations of student accuracy in criteria-based self-assessment7
Students’ use of evaluative judgement in an online peer learning community7
Factors associated with online examination cheating7
Inculcating curiosity: pilot results of an online module to enhance undergraduate intellectual virtue7
Measures of engagement in the first three weeks of higher education predict subsequent activity and attainment in first year undergraduate students: a UK case study7
A review of the changes in higher education assessment and grading policy during covid-197
Assessment cultures in higher education: reducing barriers and enabling change7
Undergraduate students’ perceptions of and responses to exemplar-based dialogic feedback7
Feedback encounters: towards a framework for analysing and understanding feedback processes6
Exploring students’ feedback seeking behavior in the context of programmatic assessment6
Developing digital creativity through authentic assessment6
Enabling feedback seeking, agency and uptake through dialogic screencast feedback6
Implementing assessment as learning in the L2 writing classroom: a Chinese case6
A systematic review on the learning outcomes in entrepreneurship education within higher education settings6
Crisis? What crisis? Interpreting student feedback on assessment6
Can assessment-specific marking criteria and electronic comment libraries increase student engagement with assessment and feedback?6
Are students gender-neutral in their assessment of online teaching staff?6
More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing6
How does grade inflation affect student evaluation of teaching?6
Designing assessment for inclusion: an exploration of diverse students’ assessment experiences6
Beyond the grade: the planning, formative and summative (PFS) model of self-assessment for higher education6
Student satisfaction with use of an online peer feedback system6
Drivers for authenticity: student approaches and responses to an authentic assessment task6
Repositioning peer marking for feedback literacy in higher education6
What do college students think of feedback literacy? An ecological interpretation of Hong Kong students’ perspectives6
Exploring intercultural dialogic interactions between individuals with diverse feedback literacies6
Beyond open book versus closed book: a taxonomy of restrictions in online examinations6
What makes students contribute more peer feedback? The role of within-course experience with peer feedback6
Proactive receiver roles in peer feedback dialogue: Facilitating receivers’ self-regulation and co-regulating providers’ learning5
What do examiners look for in a PhD thesis? Explicit and implicit criteria used by examiners across disciplines5
Designing a rubric for reflection in nursing: a Legitimation Code Theory and systemic functional linguistics-informed framework5
Providing assessment feedback to pre-service teachers: a study of examiners’ comments5
Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches5
Investigating the role of convenors in the PhD viva5
The Westerveld framework for interprofessional feedback dialogues in health professions education5
Enabling and valuing feedback literacies5
In search of valid non-cognitive student selection criteria5
The relative impact of in-class closed-book versus take-home open-book examination type on academic performance, student knowledge retention and wellbeing5
A strategic framework for delivering ongoing feedback at scale5
Using scaffolding strategies to improve formative assessment practice in higher education5
Examiners’ use of rubric criteria for grading bachelor theses5
OK google: what’s the answer? characteristics of students who searched the internet during an online chemistry examination5
Math anxiety and perfectionistic concerns in multiple-choice assessment5
The focus, function and framing of feedback information: linguistic and content analysis of in-text feedback comments5
Learning objectives and their effects on learning and assessment preparation: insights from an undergraduate psychology course5
Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback5
Performing teacher feedback literacy in peer mentoring meetings4
Addressing cheating in virtual proctored examinations: toward a framework of relevant mitigation strategies4
Students’ experience of making and receiving peer assessment: the effect of self-assessed knowledge and trust4
Designing collaborative problem solving assessment tasks in engineering: an evaluative judgement perspective4
Does students’ evaluation of teaching improve teaching quality? Improvement versus the reversal effect4
First, do no harm: automated detection of abusive comments in student evaluation of teaching surveys4
How student evaluations of teaching affect course enrollment4
Comprehensive analysis of the predictive validity of the university entrance score in Hungary4
Assessment design decisions in practice: Profile identification in approaches to assessment design4
Developing interactive oral assessments to foster graduate attributes in higher education4
Examining strategies to increase student evaluation of teaching completion rates4
Online course experiences matter: adapting and applying the CEQ to the online teaching context during COVID-19 in China4
Assessing university student collaboration in new ways4
Unravelling the relationship between student engagement and learning outcomes in emergency online learning: a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative results4
Development of the teaching competencies scale4
Qualitative approaches to researching evaluative judgement in pedagogical activities: a case study4
Procedures, criteria and decision-making in doctoral admissions: the case of China’s leading research universities4
How are examinations inclusive for students with disabilities in higher education? A sociomaterial analysis4
0.087683916091919