Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Papers
(The median citation count of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-06-01 to 2026-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
Processes and outcomes in a curriculum-level student self-assessment intervention: a case study201
Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback161
Disclosing own reasoning while appraising the students’ reasoning: implications for developments in formative assessment in science-engineering education139
Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement90
Generative AI-driven feedback in higher education: a scoping review85
Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study84
Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence79
Feedback literacy-as-event: relationality, space and temporality in feedback encounters76
Feedback as an epistemic practice75
Enhancing the structure of feedback forms increases trustworthiness and usefulness of peer feedback65
A dual-cycle peer evaluation model to enhance student feedback literacy: a three-round empirical educational study62
Alternative grading systems and student outcomes: a comparative analysis of motivation, enjoyment, engagement, stress, and perceptions of final grades58
The final examination of the UK PhD: fit for purpose?56
How vulnerable are UK universities to cheating with new GenAI tools? A pragmatic risk assessment56
Exploring the practical feasibility of adaptive comparative judgment as a summative assessment method53
‘I don’t know if people realize the impact of their words’: how does feedback during internship impact nursing student learning?51
Learner-generated podcasts: an authentic and enjoyable assessment for students working in pairs49
The effects of gender and training on peer feedback characteristics49
The reliability of student evaluations of teaching45
Empowering agency through learner-orchestrated self-generated feedback43
Perceptions of graduate attribute development and application in PhD graduates from US and NZ universities40
The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation40
Rethinking bias in student evaluations: a multivariate analysis of observable instructional behaviors37
Evolution of feedback ecology: reshaping students’ conceptions and practices in feedback literacy35
Interventions and facilitators of oral assessment performance in higher education: a systematic review32
Setting the bar: simulating the effect of admission instruments on student cohorts’ diversity31
Enabling feedback seeking, agency and uptake through dialogic screencast feedback29
A systematic review of feedback literacy in higher education: concepts, measurement, and interventions29
Towards an ecological understanding of student emotions in feedback: a scoping review29
Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality28
Learning as a peer assessor: evaluating peer-assessment strategies28
Approaches to feedback on examination performance: research, policy, and practice27
Assessment purposes and theoretical foundations in university mathematics assessment practices: a comprehensive scoping review26
Developing assessment literacy among trainee translators: scaffolding self and peer assessment as an intervention26
Feedback literacy in design-based settings: a study of architecture students24
Enhancing feedback practices within PhD supervision: a qualitative framework synthesis of the literature22
Is continuous assessment inclusive? An analysis of factors influencing student grades22
Integrating GenAI feedback and dialogic peer feedback to improve academic writing performance and revision practices: a quasi-experimental study21
Effect of regulation scripts for dialogic peer assessment on feedback quality, critical thinking and climate of trust21
How does motivation influence students’ feedback seeking processes?21
Exploring students’ feedback seeking behavior in the context of programmatic assessment21
Unravelling students’ self-feedback in peer-feedback processes: looking beyond the reviewing-receiving dichotomy21
The end of the line? A quantitative analysis of two decades of competitive assessment and research funding in UK higher education20
What to assess when assessing collaborative assignments: the practitioner perspective19
Physiotherapy student perceptions of the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of continuous adaptive assessment19
Assessing engagement with Indigenous perspectives via virtual reality and concepts of ungrading18
Cheating as a prosocial act? Helping others with academic cheating is related to social goals and cooperative norms18
Programmatic assessment: a literature review of challenges, opportunities and useful tools to support student transition to the workplace17
Do peer assessment ratings reflect individual contributions? Validity evidence from multicultural student teams17
Do students generate better self-feedback by comparing their work against assessment criteria or exemplars?17
Are men and women really different? The effects of gender and training on peer scoring and perceptions of peer assessment17
Two sides of the same coin: a taxonomy of academic integrity and impropriety using intellectual virtues and vices16
How the order of performance levels influences rubric engagement and task performance in digital environments?16
Promoting learner self-regulation: is it better to give students exemplars before or after producing work?16
Using AI to generate formative feedback in doctoral education16
The language of assessment: identifying challenging terminology for students and exploring implications for practice15
Faculty’s perception of peer observation of teaching: the case of a higher education institution in Malta15
How to close the learning circle? Students’ perspectives on how programmatic assessment influences self-regulated learning in a global online programme15
Procedures, criteria and decision-making in doctoral admissions: the case of China’s leading research universities14
Tracking student feedback literacy: a longitudinal study from the perspective of feedback orientation14
‘This form could give me the courage to address otherwise undiscussed topics’: student reasons for (not) impacting their feedback environment14
Developing a college student feedback literacy scale for the GenAI context14
In search of learning-focused feedback practices: a linguistic analysis of higher education feedback policy14
Discrimination against academics and career implications of student evaluations: university policy versus legal compliance13
Rubrics in higher education: an exploration of undergraduate students’ understanding and perspectives13
Interplay between student and teacher feedback literacies within pre-service teachers: a mixed-methods study13
Feedback dialogue in intercultural doctoral supervision13
A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors13
The Peradex: a performance-based assessment approach for adaptive expertise using design scenarios and artificial intelligence13
Academic socialisation through AI and peer feedback in doctoral writing: information and orientation in feedback ecologies13
Comparing ChatGPT-5 and other GenAI tools in doctoral confirmation: variability, persona effects, and alignment with human feedback13
Student partnership in assessment in higher education: a systematic review13
From collaboration to contract cheating: exploring staff and student perceptions of the grey areas of academic outsourcing12
Beyond penalties: a proactive approach to developing student understanding of academic integrity12
Feedback format preferences of international post-graduate students in Australia: an exploratory mixed methods study12
Humanising feedback encounters: a qualitative study of relational literacies for teachers engaging in technology-enhanced feedback12
Anchoring bias in peer assessment: exploring the impact of recommendations on peer rating value and peer feedback valence12
Design review dialogues: a study of reviewer-student verbal interaction in a signature feedback method12
Unpacking teacher beliefs on feedback: shaping multifaceted teacher feedback literacy11
The use and influence of supervisor marking in graduate research project assessment: a scoping review11
Playing the SET game: how teachers view the impact of student evaluation on the experience of teaching and learning11
Teacher and peer feedback effects on student feedback literacy in disciplinary academic writing11
Who cares about grade inflation? The role of institutional policy in regulating course grades in higher education10
Authentic assessment: from panacea to criticality10
Towards a framework for designing and evaluating online assessments in business education10
Masked ball for all: how anonymity affects students’ perceived comfort levels in peer feedback10
Closing the gap, not the door: inclusive assessment as a key to international student success in UK higher education10
Understanding the place and value of GenAI feedback: a recognition-based framework10
Re-conceptualising learner feedback agency: a situational, deliberative and entangled perspective10
Cross-border higher education in Europe and the role of quality assurance agencies10
Addressing the shortcomings of the closed-door viva for PhD and doctoral candidates in the UK: a voice for academic examiners10
A critical review of the quality of research on quality culture in higher education 19
Collaboration, collusion, and barter-cheating: an analysis of academic help-seeking behaviors9
Using concept maps as an assessment task for international taught postgraduate students: Is it a ‘helpful bridge’ or ‘blunt instrument’?9
Generative AI vs. instructor vs. peer assessments: a comparison of grading and feedback in higher education9
Teachers’ continuing professional development: using student evaluations to start a dialogue9
We cannot agree to disagree: ensuring consistency, transparency and fairness across bachelor thesis writing, supervision and evaluation8
Predicting the changing relationship between students’ self-concepts and task perceptions in peer feedback8
Student experiences of the ‘closed-door’ PhD and doctorate level viva voce: a systematic review of the literature8
Teacher feedback literacy as an emerging field: a scoping review8
Flexible assessment: some benefits and costs for students and instructors8
Balancing pedagogical innovation with psychological safety?8
Assessment professional development courses for university teachers: a nationwide analysis exploring length, evaluation and content8
Self-assessment design in a digital world: centring student agency8
Supporting postgraduate students’ engagement: an Activity Theory analysis of the impact of a co-designed assessment8
More pain, more gain? Extricating the effect of student involvement in rubric co-construction8
Correction8
Integrating peer assessment into experiential learning: the validity and learning benefits of peer assessment in reading circle discussions7
A peer review model for supervised work Integrated learning assessment: design principles and implementation framework7
Can ChatGPT effectively complement teacher assessment of undergraduate students’ academic writing?7
Understanding university instructor responses to machine-learning analysis of mid-semester teaching evaluations7
Ordered or scrambled: how the forward sequencing of multiple choice questions affects test item scores7
Playing by the many rules: taught masters and their assessment regulations7
AI feedback literacy in higher education: understanding, measuring, and predicting student feedback uptake7
Does perception mean learning? Insights from an online peer feedback setting7
Teacher feedback, rubrics, and annotated exemplars: examining the effects on Italian psychology university students’ performance on writing assignments7
Engaging in a collaborative space: exploring the substance and impact of peer review conversations7
Students’ motivations for feedback seeking: the value of combined monitoring and inquiry7
Dialogism in feedback literacies: a critical review7
The role of language on assessment outcomes: an analysis of calculation and explanation questions in science classrooms7
A systematic-narrative review of performance-based assessments of critical thinking in higher education7
Feedback practices in journal peer-review: a systematic literature review6
Are assessment accommodations cheating? A critical policy analysis6
Understanding students’ perceptions of fairness in group work assessment: key conditions and implications6
How university students work on assessment tasks with generative artificial intelligence: matters of judgement6
Assessment design through co-design: reimagining assessment design practices in higher education6
An empirical study of Chinese EFL student writers’ use of GenAI feedback during revision: perceptions, engagement and motivational impact6
Feedback encounters in doctoral supervision: the role of generative AI chatbots6
Perceptions of feedback: the use of self-reflection to improve student satisfaction6
Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence6
Student contributions to quality assurance in higher education: a systematic literature review6
Recognition of Prior Learning Translation and Transfer (RPLTT): using Actor-Network-Theory to develop a specialised pedagogy6
Bridging AI and pedagogy: how AI-adaptive feedback shapes Chinese EFL students’ writing engagement, metacognitive writing strategies, and writing performance6
Interview assessment as compressed judgement: how evidence becomes recognisable under interactional constraint6
Exploring Chinese EFL undergraduates’ academic emotions in giving and receiving peer feedback on writing6
Beyond either-or: a multimodal framework for balancing rigor, fairness and engagement in higher education6
Using a self-reflective ePortfolio and feedback dialogue to understand and address problematic feedback expectations6
Who succeeds and who fails? Comparing the impact of admissions and first-year performance on academic success6
Connecting students’ descriptions of classroom assessment in higher education with wellness6
Does metalinguistic explanation of teacher and ChatGPT feedback improve EFL learners’ writing quality and engagement? Findings from an intervention study6
Quantifying halo effects in students’ evaluation of teaching: a response to Michela6
Consistency in providing peer feedback: the role of individual and situational factors6
Context-aware GenAI feedback for fostering student feedback literacy and informing revision decisions in social science writing6
Effects of teacher, peer and self-feedback on student improvement in online assessment: the role of individuals’ presumptions and feedback literacy6
The human touch of feedback: students’ experiences of CARE in peer versus AI-generated feedback6
How can learners practice evaluative judgement using qualitative self-assessment?5
Leveraging self-regulated learning to develop L2 students’ feedback literacy in GenAI-mediated writing environments: an intervention study5
How much is too much? Medical students’ perceptions of evaluation and research requests, and suggestions for practice5
Exploring L2 students’ feedback literacy development through a pedagogically customised digital platform5
Enhancing statistics education through student-generated data and authentic assessment5
Examining university instructors’ continuance intentions for online assessment: the role of safeguards, openness and cognitive reactions5
Development and validation of a scale to assess students’ perceptions of team feedback in collaborative tasks5
The student feedback literacy instrument (SFLI): multilingual validation and introduction of a short-form version5
Faculty assessment development in higher education: the CRAFT framework emerging from a systematic literature review5
A review of the changes in higher education assessment and grading policy during covid-195
A community of practice approach to understanding how students develop feedback literacy enabling the processing and enactment of feedback5
Measuring what learners do in feedback: the feedback literacy behaviour scale5
Measuring reflective thinking in research-based learning: a scale development and initial validation study5
On bot-proofing5
Re-examining our feedback model: strategies for enhancing student learning and cultivating feedback literacy through formative assessments5
Assessing engineering students’ perspectives of entrepreneurship education within higher education: a comparative study in Hong Kong5
Higher education quality assurance in Central Europe – Beyond accreditation towards divergence5
Exploring students’ strategy-related beliefs and their mediation on strategies to act on feedback in L2 writing5
Feedback, reflection and psychological safety: rethinking assessment for student well-being in higher education5
Exploring the role of peer review in enhancing writing feedback literacy: a comparison of face-to-face and online modes5
The role of digital technology in authentic assessment: perspectives of university educators5
Students’ ‘fast and frugal’ heuristics in SET completion: a preliminary typology5
Mathematics self-concept and response pattern in higher education examinations: differences between genders4
A practical approach to overcoming biases in comparing student performance in higher education4
Ten years of editing Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education4
Self-Positions in student teachers’ perceptions of assessment4
Are students barking up the wrong tree? A causal model of factors driving effective student–faculty interactions4
A scientometric review of research on student plagiarism (1970–2022)4
Feedback literacy matters: unlocking the potential of learning analytics-based feedback4
Assessment practices in Spanish universities: a nationwide update seven years on4
Faculty assessment choices in higher education: drivers, strategies, and decision‑making styles for fair and inclusive practice4
The power of praise: the central role of affective peer feedback in interest-based learning4
Are satisfied students simply happy people in the first place? The role of trait affect in student satisfaction4
Longitudinal effects of feedback from peer, AI, and exemplars on student feedback literacy development: a latent growth curve analysis4
Black Box Assessment: rethinking integrity and learning for a time of Generative AI4
Online learning environments and approaches to learning among international students in China: the mediating roles of teacher- and student-initiated interactions4
Fostering higher education students’ perceptions of trust and participation in peer feedback: investigating the efficacy of an intervention combining training and backward evaluation4
Feedback providers’ contributions of and benefits from engaging in online peer micro-teaching feedback practices4
Navigating success in higher education: engagement as a mediator between learning strategies and performance in mathematics4
Rubric co-creation to promote quality, interactivity and uptake of peer feedback4
Measurement of higher education students’ and teachers’ experiences in learning management systems: a scoping review4
Summarise, elaborate, try again: exploring the effect of feedback literacy on AI-enhanced essay writing4
Setting out SET: a situational mapping of student evaluation of teaching in Australian higher education4
The impact of rubrics and scripts on self-regulation, self-efficacy and performance in collaborative problem-solving tasks3
How does grade inflation affect student evaluation of teaching?3
What does it take to provide effective peer feedback?3
Soft skills unveiled: a comprehensive exploration of employer preferences and employability essentials3
Animated process-transparency in student evaluation of teaching: effects on the quality and quantity of student feedback3
Lacking the ‘personal touch’: students’ perceptions of generative artificial intelligence in assessment feedback3
Designing assessment for inclusion: an exploration of diverse students’ assessment experiences3
What should we be assessing exactly? Higher education staff narratives on gen AI integration of assessment in a postplagiarism era3
When technological momentum overshadows pedagogical alignment: a systematic review of AI-generated formative feedback in higher education3
‘Where’s the line? It’s an absurd line’: towards a framework for acceptable uses of AI in assessment3
‘Who knows what will come next to interrupt our assessments’: the adaptability of assessments across face-to-face and online instructional environments3
Factors associated with online examination cheating3
Student voice in assessment and feedback (2011–2022): a systematic review3
Behind the grades: co-constructing fairness to reach agreement in evaluative judgement3
Same grade for different reasons, different grades for the same reason?3
From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives3
‘What you mean versus what you say’ – exploring the role of language and culture in European students’ interpretation of feedback3
Purposes and tensions in organising knowledge: trajectories of student evaluations in two research universities3
Assessment cultures in transition: translating health professions education principles for higher education3
0.094797849655151