Landscape and Urban Planning

Papers
(The H4-Index of Landscape and Urban Planning is 54. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Balancing multi-species connectivity and socio-economic factors to connect protected areas in the Paraguayan Atlantic Forest428
Editorial Board214
Building patterns and fuel features drive wildfire severity in wildland-urban interfaces in Southern Europe205
Multi-species ecological network based on asymmetric movement: Application in an urban rural fringe191
Building to conserve: Quantifying the outdoor water savings of residential redevelopment in Denver, Colorado148
Editorial Board143
Expanding the toolbox: Assessing methods for local outdoor recreation planning140
Calculating a national Anomie Density Ratio: Measuring the patterns of loneliness and social isolation across the UK’s residential density gradient using results from the UK Biobank study138
Green to gold mile: An environmental justice analysis of drought and mitigation policy impacts on home landscapes in Sacramento California119
Prevalence and effectiveness of nature-based interventions to impact adult health-related behaviours and outcomes: A scoping review118
Attitudes and preferences towards elements of formal and informal public green spaces in two South African towns113
Community, pastoralism, landscape: Eliciting values and human-nature connectedness of forest-related people107
Comparing landscape value patterns between participatory mapping and geolocated social media content across Europe105
Scales of inequality: The role of spatial extent in environmental justice analysis99
Does urban sprawl lessen green space exposure? Evidence from Chinese cities98
Honeybee presence restructures pollination networks more than landscape context by reducing foraging breadths of wild bees94
Landscape value in urban neighborhoods: A pilot analysis using street-level images93
A typological study of the provision and use of communal outdoor space in Australian apartment developments90
Assessment of land cover trajectories as an indicator of urban habitat temporal continuity89
Integrating habitat risk and landscape resilience in forest protection and restoration planning for biodiversity conservation88
Global Street Experiment: A Geospatial Database of Pandemic-induced Street Transitions88
Preferring Local over Non-Local Parks? Green Space Visit Patterns by Urban Residents in Desert Cities, Arizona87
The wildland – urban interface in Europe: Spatial patterns and associations with socioeconomic and demographic variables87
Urban tree inventories as a tool to assess tree growth and failure: The case for Australian cities87
Integrating conservation targets and ecosystem services in landscape spatial planning from Portugal86
What’s behind the barriers? Uncovering structural conditions working against urban nature-based solutions85
Perceived benefits from agroforestry landscapes across North-Eastern Europe: What matters and for whom?85
Urban overall and visible greenness and diabetes among older adults in China82
‘Blossom Buddies’ − How do flower colour combinations affect emotional response and influence therapeutic landscape design?81
Developing and testing the senior park environment assessment in Korea (SPEAK) audit tool80
Motivations for urban front gardening: A quantitative analysis76
Species richness is positively related to mental health – A study for Germany74
Assessment of heat mitigation capacity of urban greenspaces with the use of InVEST urban cooling model, verified with day-time land surface temperature data74
Beyond the luxury effect: Individual and structural drivers lead to ‘urban forest inequity’ in public street trees in Melbourne, Australia71
A method to prioritize and allocate nature-based solutions in urban areas based on ecosystem service demand71
Associations between green space availability and youth’s physical activity in urban and rural areas across Germany70
Vertical greening systems serve as effective means to promote pollinators: Experimental comparison of vertical and horizontal plantings69
Substitution effects and spatial factors in the social demand for landscape aesthetics in agroecosystems65
Local people’s sense of place in heavily touristified protected areas: Contested place meanings around the Wulingyuan World Heritage Site, China65
Drone imagery to create a common understanding of landscapes65
Combining multiple socio-cultural approaches – Deeper insights into cultural ecosystem services of mountain lakes?63
Assessing public opinion using self-organizing maps. Lessons from urban planning in Romania63
Air regulation service is affected by green areas cover and fragmentation: An analysis using demand, supply and flow during COVID-19 quarantine63
Factors influencing informal trail conditions: Implications for management and research in Urban-Proximate parks and protected areas62
Managing urban trees through storms in three United States cities62
Simulating urban land growth by incorporating historical information into a cellular automata model60
Does gentrification precede and follow greening? Evidence about the green gentrification cycle in Los Angeles and Chicago59
How does town planning affect urban-rural income inequality: Evidence from China with simultaneous equation analysis59
Urban tree diversity fosters bird insectivory despite a loss in bird diversity with urbanization57
Examining ecological justice within the social-ecological-technological system of New York City, USA57
Where money grows on trees: A socio-ecological assessment of land use change in an agricultural frontier56
Regional-dependent tolerance to humans: A multi-country comparison of horizontal and vertical escape distance in arboreal squirrels56
Editorial Board55
Pollinator gardening is constrained by income but not lot size in urban front yards55
Can environmental legislation protect a threatened apex predator across different land tenures?54
0.11823797225952