Law and Philosophy

Papers
(The TQCC of Law and Philosophy is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-08-01 to 2026-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Book Review6
Book Review5
Race, Sex, and the Cost of Accidents4
Cultural Injustice and Refugee Discrimination4
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ4
Remove or Reduce: Demotion, Content Moderation, and Human Rights4
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote4
Exhortative Legal Influence3
Lawful, but not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law3
Property Rights and Natural Resources3
When Legal Reform Wrongs Rights-Holders3
An Analogie model based on IBE3
Harms, Relationships, and the Contours of Liability for Emotional Distress2
The concurrence of wrongdoing and culpability2
The Sources of Authoritative Exclusion2
Value Pluralism and Blind Compromise: Obstacles to Reciprocity in Religion and Law2
Public Justice and the End of Constitutional Law1
The Lesser Evil Argument for (and Against) Political Obligation1
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right1
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?1
Book Review1
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue1
Recourse, Litigation, and the Rule of Law1
Justice as a Variation on a Theme1
When Do Unequal Results Amount to Wrongful Indirect Discrimination?1
Relational Justice and the Value of Private Law1
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment1
Duties to Criminalize Overinclusively1
The Independence of Tort Law1
From form and procedure to substance1
Separating Law and Liberty1
Theorizing Private Law Beyond the State1
Digital Power and Law’s Rule1
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War1
The conceptual structure of perjury1
Can the One-System Picture Be Systematic?1
Book Review1
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians1
0.081650972366333