Law and Philosophy

Papers
(The median citation count of Law and Philosophy is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-09-01 to 2025-09-01.)
ArticleCitations
Book Review10
Book Review8
Cultural Injustice and Refugee Discrimination7
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ4
Lawful, but not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law3
Dissent-Sensitive Permissions3
Retributivism and Over-Punishment3
When Legal Reform Wrongs Rights-Holders3
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote3
Proportionality and Its Discontents2
The Sources of Authoritative Exclusion2
An Analogie model based on IBE2
Criminal Theory and Critical Theory: Husak in the Age of Abolition2
Are Tort Remedies ‘Civil Recourse’?2
‘But You Could Have Hurt Me!’: Risk and Harm2
Exhortative Legal Influence2
The conceptual structure of perjury1
The Lesser Evil Argument for (and Against) Political Obligation1
Morality and Institutional Detail in the Law of Torts: Reflections on Goldberg’s and Zipursky’s Recognizing Wrongs1
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment1
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War1
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue1
Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making1
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians1
When Do Unequal Results Amount to Wrongful Indirect Discrimination?1
In Defense of Patient-Centered Theories of Deontology: A Response to Liao and Barry1
Harms, Relationships, and the Contours of Liability for Emotional Distress1
Book Review1
From form and procedure to substance1
Recourse, Litigation, and the Rule of Law1
On the State’s Exclusive Right to Punish1
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?1
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right1
Digital Power and Law’s Rule1
How Resilient is the War Contract?1
Ethics, Force, and Power: On the Political Preconditions of Just War1
Book Review1
Is Disability a Tort and Why?0
Book Review0
The Institutionalisation of the Basic Validity Rule0
Liberty, Secrecy, and the Right of Assessment0
THE CONTOURS OF CORPORATE MORAL AGENCY0
BOOK REVIEW0
Book Review0
Book Review0
Disagreement by War0
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law0
Now It’s Personal: From Me to Mine to Property Rights0
Revisiting the “But Everybody Does That!” Defense0
Normative Positions: Against the Dual View0
Aim or preference? Reflections on the commitment to the truth in the criminal process0
Book Review0
Moves & Rules: Addressing the Puzzle of Social Rule-Following0
Legislative Intent and the Hard Problem of Content0
Why Metaphysics Matters: The Case of Property Law0
Response to Five Critics0
Replies to Commentators0
The Death of the Legal Author: Authority, Intention, and Law-Creation in the Advent of GenAI0
Harmless Discrimination, Wrongs, and Rules0
Tort Law and Contractualism0
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe0
What Legislation Is (Not): Comparing Legislation And Legal Rulings0
Proportionality in the Liability to Compensate0
Property, Authority, and Unavoidable Unilateralism0
Stare Decisis and Equitable Power0
Mala Prohibita, the Wrongfulness Constraint, and the Problem of Overcriminalization0
Coercion Without Incapacitation0
Bentham on Laws in principem, Judicial Review, and the Public Opinion Tribunal: A Critique of Hart’s and Postema’s Criticisms0
Abetting a Crime: A New Approach0
On Normative Redundancies and Conflicts: A Material Approach0
The Personality of Public Authorities0
What a Home Does0
Paternalism at a Distance0
The Law of Negligence, Blameworthy Action and the Relationality Thesis: A Dilemma for Goldberg and Zipursky’s Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law0
Hart as an Inferentialist: The Methodological Pragmatist Insight in Hart’s Inaugural Lecture0
Critical Mercy in Criminal Law0
Book Review0
Introduction to the Symposium on War By Agreement by Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman0
Should Criminal Law Mirror Moral Blameworthiness or Criminal Culpability? A Reply to Husak0
Arbitrary Power: Caricature and Concept0
What it means for an event to harm: a historical baseline variant of the causal account of harming0
If You Care About a Rule, Why Weaken Its Enforcement Dimension? On a Tension in the War Convention0
Are Parents Fiduciaries?0
Accidentally Killing on Purpose: Transferred Malice and Missing Victims0
Stability, Autonomy, and the Foundations of Political Liberalism0
Public Ownership0
Reply to Allen0
Authority, Democracy, and Legislative Intent0
Strong Political Liberalism0
A Consequentialist Framework for Prevention0
Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action0
On Blame and Punishment: Self-blame, Other-Blame, and Normative Negligence0
Book Review0
Rights, Wronging, and Equality of Status0
What Makes a Home: A Reply0
Conditional Relevance and Conditional Admissibility0
Maximilian Kiener: Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2023), 120 Pounds cloth, 35.09 Ebook0
Kinship, Justice, and Inheritance: The Case of ‘Rest’ in Ethiopia0
Gregory Keating’s Framework for Understanding Tort Law0
Finding Leviathan in Hegel: The Private Rule of Law and its Limits0
Justifying Harm-Based Strict Liability: Reflections on Keating’s Reasonableness and Risk0
Rights and Demands: A Response to Kamm0
The moral permissibility of banishment0
Varieties of Consequentialism and Deontology in Theories of Tort Law0
‘De Minimis’ and the Structure of the Criminal Trial0
Paternalistic Discrimination0
Enough Spurious Distinctions: Refugees are Just People in Need of Refuge0
Liability for Emissions without Laws or Political Institutions0
Redress and Reparations for Injurious Wrongs0
Tempering Power and its Tensions0
Climate Refugees and the Limits of Reparative Obligations to Offer Asylum0
Religious Reasons in Politics: Some Problems for the Free Marketplace Model0
Algorithmic and Non-Algorithmic Fairness: Should We Revise our View of the Latter Given Our View of the Former?0
Keeping Hohfeld Simple0
The Internal Point of View0
Metalinguistic Negotiation in Legal Speech0
Book Review0
Hate-Speech Bans are at Odds with Central Principles of Liberalism0
Relational and Distributive Discrimination0
Who are the Bearers of Tort Law’s Duties?0
Challenging the State’s Claim to Authority0
0.051350831985474