Law and Philosophy

Papers
(The median citation count of Law and Philosophy is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Book Review10
Book Review6
Cultural Injustice and Refugee Discrimination6
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ5
Dissent-Sensitive Permissions4
Lawful, but not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law3
Retributivism and Over-Punishment3
In the Region of Middle Axioms: Judicial Dialogue as Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Mid-level Principles3
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote3
Proportionality and Its Discontents2
An Analogie model based on IBE2
In Defense of Patient-Centered Theories of Deontology: A Response to Liao and Barry2
Criminal Theory and Critical Theory: Husak in the Age of Abolition2
Exhortative Legal Influence2
Are Tort Remedies ‘Civil Recourse’?2
‘But You Could Have Hurt Me!’: Risk and Harm2
The Sources of Authoritative Exclusion2
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment2
Digital Power and Law’s Rule1
Morality and Institutional Detail in the Law of Torts: Reflections on Goldberg’s and Zipursky’s Recognizing Wrongs1
How Resilient is the War Contract?1
From form and procedure to substance1
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right1
BOOK REVIEW1
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?1
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue1
The conceptual structure of perjury1
The Lesser Evil Argument for (and Against) Political Obligation1
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War1
Book Review1
Ethics, Force, and Power: On the Political Preconditions of Just War1
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law0
Varieties of Consequentialism and Deontology in Theories of Tort Law0
Climate Refugees and the Limits of Reparative Obligations to Offer Asylum0
Keeping Hohfeld Simple0
BOOK REVIEW0
Algorithmic and Non-Algorithmic Fairness: Should We Revise our View of the Latter Given Our View of the Former?0
The Personality of Public Authorities0
Public Ownership0
Why Metaphysics Matters: The Case of Property Law0
Tort Law and Contractualism0
Replies to Commentators0
Finding Leviathan in Hegel: The Private Rule of Law and its Limits0
Stare Decisis and Equitable Power0
Book Review0
Moves & Rules: Addressing the Puzzle of Social Rule-Following0
Book Review0
Strong Political Liberalism0
Response to Five Critics0
Accidentally Killing on Purpose: Transferred Malice and Missing Victims0
Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action0
What Legislation Is (Not): Comparing Legislation And Legal Rulings0
A Consequentialist Framework for Prevention0
Against Public Reason’s Alleged Self-Defeat0
Introduction0
What Makes a Home: A Reply0
Now It’s Personal: From Me to Mine to Property Rights0
On Normative Redundancies and Conflicts: A Material Approach0
BOOK REVIEW0
Rights and Demands: A Response to Kamm0
What a Home Does0
Legislative Intent and the Hard Problem of Content0
Critical Mercy in Criminal Law0
Introduction to the Symposium on War By Agreement by Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman0
The Law of Negligence, Blameworthy Action and the Relationality Thesis: A Dilemma for Goldberg and Zipursky’s Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law0
Should Criminal Law Mirror Moral Blameworthiness or Criminal Culpability? A Reply to Husak0
Are Parents Fiduciaries?0
What it means for an event to harm: a historical baseline variant of the causal account of harming0
The Internal Point of View0
Harmless Discrimination, Wrongs, and Rules0
Hate-Speech Bans are at Odds with Central Principles of Liberalism0
Stability, Autonomy, and the Foundations of Political Liberalism0
Mala Prohibita, the Wrongfulness Constraint, and the Problem of Overcriminalization0
Paternalistic Discrimination0
Coercion in Social Accounts of Law: Can Coerciveness Undermine Legality?0
Redress and Reparations for Injurious Wrongs0
Hart as an Inferentialist: The Methodological Pragmatist Insight in Hart’s Inaugural Lecture0
Maximilian Kiener: Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2023), 120 Pounds cloth, 35.09 Ebook0
Authority, Democracy, and Legislative Intent0
Liberty, Secrecy, and the Right of Assessment0
The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-making0
Aim or preference? Reflections on the commitment to the truth in the criminal process0
Relational and Distributive Discrimination0
Recourse, Litigation, and the Rule of Law0
Book Review0
The Institutionalisation of the Basic Validity Rule0
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians0
Book Review0
Kinship, Justice, and Inheritance: The Case of ‘Rest’ in Ethiopia0
Correction to: Response Retributivism: Defending The Duty To Punish0
Disagreement by War0
The moral permissibility of banishment0
‘De Minimis’ and the Structure of the Criminal Trial0
Revisiting the “But Everybody Does That!” Defense0
Proportionality in the Liability to Compensate0
Liability for Emissions without Laws or Political Institutions0
Conditional Relevance and Conditional Admissibility0
Tempering Power and its Tensions0
Delegation and the Continuity Thesis0
Religious Reasons in Politics: Some Problems for the Free Marketplace Model0
On Blame and Punishment: Self-blame, Other-Blame, and Normative Negligence0
On the State’s Exclusive Right to Punish0
Rights, Wronging, and Equality of Status0
Arbitrary Power: Caricature and Concept0
Metalinguistic Negotiation in Legal Speech0
The Circumstances of Civil Recourse0
If You Care About a Rule, Why Weaken Its Enforcement Dimension? On a Tension in the War Convention0
Coercion Without Incapacitation0
Book Review0
Book Review0
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe0
Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making0
THE CONTOURS OF CORPORATE MORAL AGENCY0
Reply to Allen0
Book Review0
Correction to: What is it to Apply the Law?0
Abetting a Crime: A New Approach0
Paternalism at a Distance0
Enough Spurious Distinctions: Refugees are Just People in Need of Refuge0
0.062914133071899