Law and Philosophy

Papers
(The median citation count of Law and Philosophy is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Respectful Paternalism7
Retributivism and Over-Punishment6
What a Home Does6
Deflating Parental Rights5
Mala Prohibita, the Wrongfulness Constraint, and the Problem of Overcriminalization3
On Normative Redundancies and Conflicts: A Material Approach3
The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-making3
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?3
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe3
Stability, Autonomy, and the Foundations of Political Liberalism2
Against Public Reason’s Alleged Self-Defeat2
‘But You Could Have Hurt Me!’: Risk and Harm2
The One-System View and Dworkin’s Anti-Archimedean Eliminativism2
Liability for Emissions without Laws or Political Institutions2
On Blame and Punishment: Self-blame, Other-Blame, and Normative Negligence2
From Angels to Humans: Law, Coercion, and the Society of Angels Thought Experiment2
‘De Minimis’ and the Structure of the Criminal Trial2
What Makes a Home: A Reply2
Relational and Distributive Discrimination2
Proportionality and Its Discontents1
Dissent-Sensitive Permissions1
Book Review1
Should Criminal Law Mirror Moral Blameworthiness or Criminal Culpability? A Reply to Husak1
Finding Leviathan in Hegel: The Private Rule of Law and its Limits1
Conditional Relevance and Conditional Admissibility1
The Law of Negligence, Blameworthy Action and the Relationality Thesis: A Dilemma for Goldberg and Zipursky’s Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law1
Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making1
The Institutionalisation of the Basic Validity Rule1
Are Parents Fiduciaries?1
In Defense of Patient-Centered Theories of Deontology: A Response to Liao and Barry1
Abetting a Crime: A New Approach1
Replies to Commentators0
Book Review0
Coercion Without Incapacitation0
Introduction to the Symposium on War By Agreement by Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman0
Recourse, Litigation, and the Rule of Law0
Introduction0
Rights, Wronging, and Equality of Status0
Critical Mercy in Criminal Law0
Keeping Hohfeld Simple0
BOOK REVIEW0
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote0
Now It’s Personal: From Me to Mine to Property Rights0
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law0
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ0
Kinship, Justice, and Inheritance: The Case of ‘Rest’ in Ethiopia0
Strong Political Liberalism0
What’s the Party Like? The Status of the Political Party in Anti-Defection Jurisdictions0
A Note on Margaret Gilbert’s Rights and Demands0
Book Review0
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue0
Redress and Reparations for Injurious Wrongs0
Digital Power and Law’s Rule0
Is There Moral Magic in the Word “Right”? Cruft on Rights and the Elusive “Deontically Infused Good”0
Harmless Discrimination, Wrongs, and Rules0
The Internal Point of View0
Revisiting the “But Everybody Does That!” Defense0
Lawful, but not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law0
The Circumstances of Civil Recourse0
Autonomy for Contract, Refined0
Delegation and the Continuity Thesis0
Correction to: Response Retributivism: Defending The Duty To Punish0
If You Care About a Rule, Why Weaken Its Enforcement Dimension? On a Tension in the War Convention0
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War0
The Contracting Theory of Choices0
Algorithmic and Non-Algorithmic Fairness: Should We Revise our View of the Latter Given Our View of the Former?0
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right0
Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action0
Arbitrary Power: Caricature and Concept0
What Legislation Is (Not): Comparing Legislation And Legal Rulings0
Hart as an Inferentialist: The Methodological Pragmatist Insight in Hart’s Inaugural Lecture0
On the State’s Exclusive Right to Punish0
Are Tort Remedies ‘Civil Recourse’?0
What Is It to Apply the Law?0
Conditional Consent0
Book Review0
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment0
Paternalism at a Distance0
Maximilian Kiener: Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2023), 120 Pounds cloth, 35.09 Ebook0
Why Metaphysics Matters: The Case of Property Law0
Book Review0
Moves & Rules: Addressing the Puzzle of Social Rule-Following0
Aim or preference? Reflections on the commitment to the truth in the criminal process0
A Consequentialist Framework for Prevention0
Proportionality in the Liability to Compensate0
Ethics, Force, and Power: On the Political Preconditions of Just War0
Coercion in Social Accounts of Law: Can Coerciveness Undermine Legality?0
Correction to: What is it to Apply the Law?0
The moral permissibility of banishment0
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians0
In the Region of Middle Axioms: Judicial Dialogue as Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Mid-level Principles0
Disagreement by War0
Exhortative Legal Influence0
How Resilient is the War Contract?0
BOOK REVIEW0
Book Review0
The Personality of Public Authorities0
Stare Decisis and Equitable Power0
Authority, Democracy, and Legislative Intent0
Metalinguistic Negotiation in Legal Speech0
Criminal Theory and Critical Theory: Husak in the Age of Abolition0
THE CONTOURS OF CORPORATE MORAL AGENCY0
BOOK REVIEW0
Tort Law and Contractualism0
Reply to Allen0
Book Review0
Family Law: Values Beyond Choice and Autonomy?0
Public Ownership0
Cultural Injustice and Refugee Discrimination0
Varieties of Consequentialism and Deontology in Theories of Tort Law0
Liberty, Secrecy, and the Right of Assessment0
The conceptual structure of perjury0
Climate Refugees and the Limits of Reparative Obligations to Offer Asylum0
Accidentally Killing on Purpose: Transferred Malice and Missing Victims0
Religious Reasons in Politics: Some Problems for the Free Marketplace Model0
Response to Five Critics0
Morality and Institutional Detail in the Law of Torts: Reflections on Goldberg’s and Zipursky’s Recognizing Wrongs0
Book Review0
0.10665607452393