Law and Philosophy

Papers
(The median citation count of Law and Philosophy is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-01-01 to 2025-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote8
Metalinguistic Negotiation in Legal Speech7
Redress and Reparations for Injurious Wrongs6
Are Parents Fiduciaries?5
Book Review3
The Personality of Public Authorities3
What’s the Party Like? The Status of the Political Party in Anti-Defection Jurisdictions3
Dissent-Sensitive Permissions3
Hart as an Inferentialist: The Methodological Pragmatist Insight in Hart’s Inaugural Lecture3
Keeping Hohfeld Simple3
Reply to Allen2
Algorithmic and Non-Algorithmic Fairness: Should We Revise our View of the Latter Given Our View of the Former?2
Cultural Injustice and Refugee Discrimination2
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ2
Book Review2
Deflating Parental Rights2
THE CONTOURS OF CORPORATE MORAL AGENCY2
Retributivism and Over-Punishment2
Maximilian Kiener: Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2023), 120 Pounds cloth, 35.09 Ebook1
What Is It to Apply the Law?1
Coercion Without Incapacitation1
How Resilient is the War Contract?1
The conceptual structure of perjury1
Arbitrary Power: Caricature and Concept1
In the Region of Middle Axioms: Judicial Dialogue as Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Mid-level Principles1
If You Care About a Rule, Why Weaken Its Enforcement Dimension? On a Tension in the War Convention1
Moves & Rules: Addressing the Puzzle of Social Rule-Following1
On Normative Redundancies and Conflicts: A Material Approach1
Autonomy for Contract, Refined1
Introduction1
Paternalistic Discrimination0
Stare Decisis and Equitable Power0
‘But You Could Have Hurt Me!’: Risk and Harm0
The Circumstances of Civil Recourse0
In Defense of Patient-Centered Theories of Deontology: A Response to Liao and Barry0
Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making0
Introduction to the Symposium on War By Agreement by Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman0
Book Review0
Exhortative Legal Influence0
Liability for Emissions without Laws or Political Institutions0
What Makes a Home: A Reply0
Digital Power and Law’s Rule0
Finding Leviathan in Hegel: The Private Rule of Law and its Limits0
Aim or preference? Reflections on the commitment to the truth in the criminal process0
Book Review0
A Consequentialist Framework for Prevention0
Correction to: What is it to Apply the Law?0
Proportionality and Its Discontents0
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War0
Response to Five Critics0
Paternalism at a Distance0
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment0
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law0
From form and procedure to substance0
Respectful Paternalism0
Conditional Consent0
BOOK REVIEW0
On Blame and Punishment: Self-blame, Other-Blame, and Normative Negligence0
Kinship, Justice, and Inheritance: The Case of ‘Rest’ in Ethiopia0
Delegation and the Continuity Thesis0
Now It’s Personal: From Me to Mine to Property Rights0
The Contracting Theory of Choices0
The Law of Negligence, Blameworthy Action and the Relationality Thesis: A Dilemma for Goldberg and Zipursky’s Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law0
Should Criminal Law Mirror Moral Blameworthiness or Criminal Culpability? A Reply to Husak0
Critical Mercy in Criminal Law0
Morality and Institutional Detail in the Law of Torts: Reflections on Goldberg’s and Zipursky’s Recognizing Wrongs0
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right0
The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-making0
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?0
What it means for an event to harm: a historical baseline variant of the causal account of harming0
Against Public Reason’s Alleged Self-Defeat0
Proportionality in the Liability to Compensate0
Recourse, Litigation, and the Rule of Law0
Tempering Power and its Tensions0
Hate-Speech Bans are at Odds with Central Principles of Liberalism0
Conditional Relevance and Conditional Admissibility0
Is There Moral Magic in the Word “Right”? Cruft on Rights and the Elusive “Deontically Infused Good”0
Varieties of Consequentialism and Deontology in Theories of Tort Law0
Book Review0
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue0
Religious Reasons in Politics: Some Problems for the Free Marketplace Model0
Why Metaphysics Matters: The Case of Property Law0
Ethics, Force, and Power: On the Political Preconditions of Just War0
Tort Law and Contractualism0
A Note on Margaret Gilbert’s Rights and Demands0
Criminal Theory and Critical Theory: Husak in the Age of Abolition0
Liberty, Secrecy, and the Right of Assessment0
Stability, Autonomy, and the Foundations of Political Liberalism0
Authority, Democracy, and Legislative Intent0
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians0
BOOK REVIEW0
Replies to Commentators0
BOOK REVIEW0
Abetting a Crime: A New Approach0
The moral permissibility of banishment0
The One-System View and Dworkin’s Anti-Archimedean Eliminativism0
Correction to: Response Retributivism: Defending The Duty To Punish0
Book Review0
Rights, Wronging, and Equality of Status0
The Institutionalisation of the Basic Validity Rule0
Revisiting the “But Everybody Does That!” Defense0
Mala Prohibita, the Wrongfulness Constraint, and the Problem of Overcriminalization0
Book Review0
Harmless Discrimination, Wrongs, and Rules0
Book Review0
Climate Refugees and the Limits of Reparative Obligations to Offer Asylum0
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe0
Lawful, but not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law0
Relational and Distributive Discrimination0
Coercion in Social Accounts of Law: Can Coerciveness Undermine Legality?0
The Internal Point of View0
Public Ownership0
What a Home Does0
Are Tort Remedies ‘Civil Recourse’?0
Accidentally Killing on Purpose: Transferred Malice and Missing Victims0
Strong Political Liberalism0
Book Review0
What Legislation Is (Not): Comparing Legislation And Legal Rulings0
The Sources of Authoritative Exclusion0
‘De Minimis’ and the Structure of the Criminal Trial0
Disagreement by War0
On the State’s Exclusive Right to Punish0
Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action0
0.039315938949585