OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Law and Philosophy is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)

Article	Citations
Book Review	10
Book Review	9
Cultural Injustice and Refugee Discrimination	7
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ	4
Lawful, but not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law	3
Dissent-Sensitive Permissions	3
Retributivism and Over-Punishment	3
When Legal Reform Wrongs Rights-Holders	3
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote	3
Harms, Relationships, and the Contours of Liability for Emotional Distress	2
‘But You Could Have Hurt Me!’: Risk and Harm	2
Criminal Theory and Critical Theory: Husak in the Age of Abolition	2
Are Tort Remedies ‘Civil Recourse’?	2
An Analogie model based on IBE	2
Exhortative Legal Influence	2
Proportionality and Its Discontents	2
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War	1
In Defense of Patient-Centered Theories of Deontology: A Response to Liao and Barry	1
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right	1
The conceptual structure of perjury	1
Ethics, Force, and Power: On the Political Preconditions of Just War	1
Book Review	1
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?	1
Digital Power and Law’s Rule	1
The Sources of Authoritative Exclusion	1

The Lesser Evil Argument for (and Against) Political Obligation	1
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue	1
Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making	1
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians	1
Morality and Institutional Detail in the Law of Torts: Reflections on Goldberg’s and Zipursky’s Recognizing Wrongs	1
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment	1
When Do Unequal Results Amount to Wrongful Indirect Discrimination?	1
How Resilient is the War Contract?	1
From form and procedure to substance	1
Recourse, Litigation, and the Rule of Law	1
Book Review	1
Now It’s Personal: From Me to Mine to Property Rights	0
Book Review	0
Justifying Harm-Based Strict Liability: Reflections on Keating’s Reasonableness and Risk	0
Arbitrary Power: Caricature and Concept	0
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law	0
Varieties of Consequentialism and Deontology in Theories of Tort Law	0
If You Care About a Rule, Why Weaken Its Enforcement Dimension? On a Tension in the War Convention	0
Normative Positions: Against the Dual View	0
Enough Spurious Distinctions: Refugees are Just People in Need of Refuge	0
Algorithmic and Non-Algorithmic Fairness: Should We Revise our View of the Latter Given Our View of the Former?	0
Authority, Democracy, and Legislative Intent	0
Book Review	0
Coercion Without Incapacitation	0
Public Ownership	0
Replies to Commentators	0
Strong Political Liberalism	0
Why Metaphysics Matters: The Case of Property Law	0
On Blame and Punishment: Self-blame, Other-Blame, and Normative Negligence	0
Liberty, Secrecy, and the Right of Assessment	0
Rights, Wronging, and Equality of Status	0
Who are the Bearers of Tort Law’s Duties?	0
Relational and Distributive Discrimination	0
Maximilian Kiener: Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2023), 120 Pounds cloth, 35.09 Ebook	0
Delegation and the Continuity Thesis	0
The Institutionalisation of the Basic Validity Rule	0
Finding Leviathan in Hegel: The Private Rule of Law and its Limits	0
The Death of the Legal Author: Authority, Intention, and Law-Creation in the Advent of GenAI	0
BOOK REVIEW	0
The moral permissibility of banishment	0
On Normative Redundancies and Conflicts: A Material Approach	0
Paternalistic Discrimination	0
Paternalism at a Distance	0
Hart as an Inferentialist: The Methodological Pragmatist Insight in Hart’s Inaugural Lecture	0
Redress and Reparations for Injurious Wrongs	0
Critical Mercy in Criminal Law	0
Revisiting the “But Everybody Does That!” Defense	0
Legislative Intent and the Hard Problem of Content	0
Climate Refugees and the Limits of Reparative Obligations to Offer Asylum	0
Should Criminal Law Mirror Moral Blameworthiness or Criminal Culpability? A Reply to Husak	0

Introduction	0
Book Review	0
What it means for an event to harm: a historical baseline variant of the causal account of harming	0
Harmless Discrimination, Wrongs, and Rules	0
The Internal Point of View	0
Stability, Autonomy, and the Foundations of Political Liberalism	0
Hate-Speech Bans are at Odds with Central Principles of Liberalism	0
Reply to Allen	0
Challenging the State’s Claim to Authority	0
What Legislation Is (Not): Comparing Legislation And Legal Rulings	0
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe	0
Book Review	0
Stare Decisis and Equitable Power	0
Property, Authority, and Unavoidable Unilateralism	0
THE CONTOURS OF CORPORATE MORAL AGENCY	0
Is Disability a Tort and Why?	0
Abetting a Crime: A New Approach	0
Bentham on Laws in principem, Judicial Review, and the Public Opinion Tribunal: A Critique of Hart’s and Postema’s Criticisms	0
Accidentally Killing on Purpose: Transferred Malice and Missing Victims	0
On the State’s Exclusive Right to Punish	0
Gregory Keating’s Framework for Understanding Tort Law	0
What a Home Does	0
Aim or preference? Reflections on the commitment to the truth in the criminal process	0
Rights and Demands: A Response to Kamm	0
Disagreement by War	0
Moves & Rules: Addressing the Puzzle of Social Rule-Following	0
‘De Minimis’ and the Structure of the Criminal Trial	0
Introduction to the Symposium on War By Agreement by Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman	0
Are Parents Fiduciaries?	0
Response to Five Critics	0
Liability for Emissions without Laws or Political Institutions	0
Tempering Power and its Tensions	0
Conditional Relevance and Conditional Admissibility	0
Religious Reasons in Politics: Some Problems for the Free Marketplace Model	0
Tort Law and Contractualism	0
Keeping Hohfeld Simple	0
Proportionality in the Liability to Compensate	0
Metalinguistic Negotiation in Legal Speech	0
Mala Prohibita, the Wrongfulness Constraint, and the Problem of Overcriminalization	0
Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action	0
A Consequentialist Framework for Prevention	0
Coercion in Social Accounts of Law: Can Coerciveness Undermine Legality?	0
Book Review	0
What Makes a Home: A Reply	0
The Personality of Public Authorities	0
Book Review	0
Kinship, Justice, and Inheritance: The Case of ‘Rest’ in Ethiopia	0
The Law of Negligence, Blameworthy Action and the Relationality Thesis: A Dilemma for Goldberg and Zipursky’s Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law	0
Correction to: What is it to Apply the Law?	0