Law and Philosophy

Papers
(The median citation count of Law and Philosophy is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-03-01 to 2024-03-01.)
ArticleCitations
Methodologies of Rule of Law Research: Why Legal Philosophy Needs Empirical and Doctrinal Scholarship10
Respectful Paternalism5
Response Retributivism: Defending the Duty to Punish4
What a Home Does4
Deflating Parental Rights4
The Dilemmas of Constitutional Courts and the Case for a New Design of Kelsenian Institutions4
Mala Prohibita, the Wrongfulness Constraint, and the Problem of Overcriminalization3
Retributivism and Over-Punishment3
The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-making3
On Normative Redundancies and Conflicts: A Material Approach3
The Morality of Treason2
What Makes a Home: A Reply2
Hart, Radbruch and the Necessary Connection Between Law and Morals2
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?2
Rethinking the Use of Statistical Evidence to Prove Causation in Criminal Cases: A Tale of (Im)Probability and Free Will2
‘But You Could Have Hurt Me!’: Risk and Harm2
Opportunity Costs Pacifism2
What Makes Disability Discrimination Wrong?2
Liability for Emissions without Laws or Political Institutions2
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe2
From Angels to Humans: Law, Coercion, and the Society of Angels Thought Experiment2
On Blame and Punishment: Self-blame, Other-Blame, and Normative Negligence1
Against the Managerial State: Preventive Policing as Non-Legal Governance1
Relational and Distributive Discrimination1
The Priority of Liberty: An Argument from Social Equality1
The Law of Negligence, Blameworthy Action and the Relationality Thesis: A Dilemma for Goldberg and Zipursky’s Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law1
Stability, Autonomy, and the Foundations of Political Liberalism1
The Institutionalisation of the Basic Validity Rule1
Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making1
Proportionality and Its Discontents1
Must Penal Law Be Insulated from Public Influence?1
Should Criminal Law Mirror Moral Blameworthiness or Criminal Culpability? A Reply to Husak1
The One-System View and Dworkin’s Anti-Archimedean Eliminativism1
Abetting a Crime: A New Approach1
Against Public Reason’s Alleged Self-Defeat1
Dissent-Sensitive Permissions1
Book Review1
‘De Minimis’ and the Structure of the Criminal Trial1
Delegation and the Continuity Thesis0
Ethics, Force, and Power: On the Political Preconditions of Just War0
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War0
Book Review0
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment0
Correction to: What is it to Apply the Law?0
Now It’s Personal: From Me to Mine to Property Rights0
Coercion Without Incapacitation0
Exhortative Legal Influence0
Kinship, Justice, and Inheritance: The Case of ‘Rest’ in Ethiopia0
Reply to Allen0
The Contracting Theory of Choices0
Book Review0
THE CONTOURS OF CORPORATE MORAL AGENCY0
Criminal Theory and Critical Theory: Husak in the Age of Abolition0
Setting Precedents Without Making Norms?0
What Legislation Is (Not): Comparing Legislation And Legal Rulings0
What’s the Party Like? The Status of the Political Party in Anti-Defection Jurisdictions0
Strong Political Liberalism0
Redress and Reparations for Injurious Wrongs0
Proportionality in the Liability to Compensate0
Book Review0
Are Parents Fiduciaries?0
Coercion in Social Accounts of Law: Can Coerciveness Undermine Legality?0
Is There Moral Magic in the Word “Right”? Cruft on Rights and the Elusive “Deontically Infused Good”0
The moral permissibility of banishment0
The Internal Point of View0
Disagreement by War0
Response to Five Critics0
BOOK REVIEW0
If You Care About a Rule, Why Weaken Its Enforcement Dimension? On a Tension in the War Convention0
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right0
Autonomy for Contract, Refined0
Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action0
On the State’s Exclusive Right to Punish0
Introduction0
Book Review0
Conditional Consent0
Hart as an Inferentialist: The Methodological Pragmatist Insight in Hart’s Inaugural Lecture0
Correction to: Book Review0
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ0
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law0
A Note on Margaret Gilbert’s Rights and Demands0
Book Review0
Family Law: Values Beyond Choice and Autonomy?0
Public Ownership0
Metalinguistic Negotiation in Legal Speech0
Religious Reasons in Politics: Some Problems for the Free Marketplace Model0
A critique of some recent victim-centered theories of nonconsequentialism0
Morality and Institutional Detail in the Law of Torts: Reflections on Goldberg’s and Zipursky’s Recognizing Wrongs0
A Consequentialist Framework for Prevention0
Replies to Commentators0
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue0
Introduction to the Symposium on War By Agreement by Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman0
State Estoppel0
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians0
How Resilient is the War Contract?0
Stare Decisis and Equitable Power0
In the Region of Middle Axioms: Judicial Dialogue as Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Mid-level Principles0
Authority, Democracy, and Legislative Intent0
BOOK REVIEW0
Conditional Relevance and Conditional Admissibility0
Critical Mercy in Criminal Law0
In Defense of Patient-Centered Theories of Deontology: A Response to Liao and Barry0
Book Review0
Correction to: Against Philosophical Anarchism0
Are Tort Remedies ‘Civil Recourse’?0
BOOK REVIEW0
Book Review0
Correction to: Response Retributivism: Defending The Duty To Punish0
What Is It to Apply the Law?0
Harmless Discrimination, Wrongs, and Rules0
Paternalism at a Distance0
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote0
Revisiting the “But Everybody Does That!” Defense0
Promises, Rights, and Deontic Control0
The Circumstances of Civil Recourse0
Accidentally Killing on Purpose: Transferred Malice and Missing Victims0
0.018020868301392