Law and Human Behavior

Papers
(The H4-Index of Law and Human Behavior is 13. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Supplemental Material for Emotion Regulation Reduces Victim Blaming of Vulnerable Sex Trafficking Survivors56
Supplemental Material for Moral Appraisals Guide Intuitive Legal Determinations21
Supplemental Material for Implicit Bias Training for Police: Evaluating Impacts on Enforcement Disparities21
Supplemental Material for Do Risk Measure Scores and Diagnoses Predict Evaluator Opinions in Sexually Violent Predator Cases? It Depends on the Evaluator18
Supplemental Material for Relational and Instrumental Perspectives on Compliance With the Law Among People Experiencing Homelessness17
Supplemental Material for Eyewitness Confidence and Mock Juror Decisions of Guilt: A Meta-Analytic Review17
Adapting assessment processes to consider cultural mistrust in forensic practices: An example with the MMPI instruments.16
Counterintuitive race effects in legal and nonlegal contexts.16
What risk assessment tools can be used with men convicted of child sexual exploitation material offenses? Recommendations from a review of current research.16
The cross-cultural fairness of the LS/RNR: An Australian analysis.15
Supplemental Material for Comparing Witness Performance in the Field Versus the Lab: How Real-World Conditions Affect Eyewitness Decision-Making14
Supplemental Material for An Offer You Cannot Refuse: Plea Offer Size Affects Innocent but Not Guilty Defendants’ Perceptions of Voluntariness14
Taking the next step in Miranda evaluations: Considering racial trauma and the impact of prior police contact.13
Racial, ethnic, and sex differences in psychiatric diagnosis, mental health sequelae, and VHA service utilization among justice-involved veterans.13
Supplemental Material for Quick and Dirty: An Evaluation of Plea Colloquy Validity in the Virtual Courtroom13
0.098891973495483