International Review of Law and Economics

Papers
(The TQCC of International Review of Law and Economics is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Strategic anarchy; a model of prison violence as a means to informal governance and rent extraction18
Workload, legal doctrine, and judicial review in an authoritarian regime: A study of expropriation judgments in China15
Law and inequality: A comparative approach to the distributive implications of legal systems12
Selling and abandoning legal rights11
Scale and scope economies in first-instance courts: Portuguese specialized vs non-specialized courts11
Liability and the incentive to improve information about risk when injurers may be judgment-proof10
Proposal convergence and settlement under final offer arbitration10
Editorial Board9
Editorial Board9
Editorial Board8
Entrepreneurs’ legal infractions and hidden information: Evidence from small business bankruptcies8
The internet echo chamber and the misinformation of judges: The case of judges’ perception of public support for the death penalty in China6
Advance disclosure of insider transactions: Empirical evidence from the Vietnamese stock market6
Regulation and purchase diversity: Empirical evidence from the U.S. alcohol market5
Fighting free with free: Freemium vs. Piracy5
Estimating the effect of U.S. concealed carry laws on homicide: A replication and sensitivity analysis5
Editorial Board5
Law enforcement with motivated agents5
Citizens united and individual sovereignty: A fresh perspective5
Lost in election. How different electoral systems translate the voting gender gap into gender representation bias5
Borrowers’ discouragement and creditor information4
How acceptable is optimal deterrence?4
Crime and the Mariel Boatlift4
Seemingly irrelevant information? The impact of legal team size on third party perceptions4
Courts as monitoring agents: The case of China3
Non-compliance of the European Court of Human Rights decisions: A machine learning analysis3
Authorial control of the Supreme Court: Chief Justice Roberts and the Obamacare surprise3
Unequal unification? Income inequality and unification in nineteenth century Italy and Germany3
Recourse restrictions and judicial foreclosures: Effects of mortgage law on loan price and collateralization3
When more isn’t always better: The ambiguity of fully transparent judicial action and unrestricted publication rules3
Which companies pay more (or less) in legal fees? An empirical study of India3
Optimal standards of proof in antitrust3
Capital structure and the optimal payment methods in acquisitions3
Litigation with adversarial efforts2
Allocating the common costs of a public service operator: An axiomatic approach2
Crime, credible enforcement, and multiple equilibria2
The effects of reputational sanctions on culpable firms: Evidence from China’s stock markets2
ON THE DECLINE IN STATE POPULATION DISTRIBUTION: A COASEAN ROLE FOR SECTION 111 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION?2
Judicial compliance in district courts2
Predicting patent lawsuits with machine learning2
A macrohistory of legal evolution and coevolution: Property, procedure, and contract in early-modern English caselaw2
Corrigendum to “The Priest-Klein hypotheses: Proofs and generality” [Int. Rev. Law Econ. 48 (2016) 59–76]2
State versus federal wiretap orders: A look at the data2
Settled: Patent characteristics and litigation outcomes in the pharmaceutical industry2
An inspector calls: On the optimality of warning firms about ongoing inspections in antitrust policy2
Allocating supervisory responsibilities to central bankers: Does national culture matter?2
Editorial Board2
Counteracting offshore tax evasion: Evidence from the foreign account tax compliance act2
Ethnolinguistic diversity, quality of local public institutions, and firm-level innovation2
Bayesian persuasion in lawyer–client communication2
Optimal fine reductions for self-reporting: The impact of loss aversion2
Should environment be a concern for competition policy when firms face environmental liability?2
0.040118932723999