British Journal of Social Psychology

Papers
(The H4-Index of British Journal of Social Psychology is 18. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Collectively coping with coronavirus: Local community identification predicts giving support and lockdown adherence during the COVID‐19 pandemic66
Neoliberalism can reduce well‐being by promoting a sense of social disconnection, competition, and loneliness61
Community identification, social support, and loneliness: The benefits of social identification for personal well‐being51
Collective resilience in the disaster recovery period: Emergent social identity and observed social support are associated with collective efficacy, well‐being, and the provision of social support45
Together we can slow the spread of COVID‐19: The interactive effects of priming collectivism and mortality salience on virus‐related health behaviour intentions36
Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire35
What predicts perceived economic inequality? The roles of actual inequality, system justification, and fairness considerations34
From bad to worse: Avoidance coping with stress increases conspiracy beliefs29
Academics as Agentic Superheroes: Female academics’ lack of fit with the agentic stereotype of success limits their career advancement28
A multilevel analysis of LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) rights support across 77 countries: The role of contact and country laws27
Implicit racism, colour blindness, and narrow definitions of discrimination: Why some White people prefer ‘All Lives Matter’ to ‘Black Lives Matter’27
Who respects the will of the people? Support for democracy is linked to high secure national identity but low national narcissism27
Compliance with governmental restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic: A matter of personal self‐protection or solidarity with people in risk groups?25
Science as collaborative knowledge generation25
Why are beliefs in different conspiracy theories positively correlated across individuals? Testing monological network versus unidimensional factor model explanations24
In it together?: Exploring solidarity with frontline workers in the United Kingdom and Ireland during COVID‐1920
Dehumanization through humour and conspiracies in online hate towards Chinese people during the COVID‐19 pandemic19
Tweeting about sexism motivates further activism: A social identity perspective18
Of precarity and conspiracy: Introducing a socio‐functional model of conspiracy beliefs18
Battling ingroup bias with effective intergroup leadership18
Meta‐humanization enhances positive reactions to prosocial cross‐group interaction18
0.029330015182495