Manuscrito

Papers
(The TQCC of Manuscrito is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)12
REFLEXIVITY, ROLE CONFLICTS, AND THE MEANING OF ENGLISH SELF PRONOUNS4
NA-NA, NA-NA, BOO-BOO, THE ACCURACY OF YOUR PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEFS IS DOO-DOO2
A FORMAL-LOGICAL APPROACH TO THE CONCEPT OF GOD2
QUASI-FIDEISM AND SCEPTICAL FIDEISM2
AWE AT NATURAL BEAUTY AS DEFEASIBLE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD,2
FUNDAMENTALITY AND THE EXISTENCE OF GOD2
LINGUISTIC MEANING MEETS LINGUISTIC FORM IN ACTION1
ERRATUM1
LINGUISTIC MEANINGS MEET LINGUISTIC FORM1
DO LINGUISTIC MEANINGS MEET LINGUISTIC FORM?1
BIFURCATIONS ON THE ROAD: CONFLICTING INTENTIONS AND DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE1
ISSUES CONCERNING LINGUISTIC MEANING AND FORM: INTRODUCTORY REMARKS1
REPLY TO PETER LUDLOW1
Deflationism about Truth-Directedness1
IS THE PROBLEM OF CONFLICTING INTENTIONS A GENUINE PROBLEM? SOME REMARKS ON GÓMEZ-TORRENTE´S “ROADS TO REFERENCE”1
THE EXPLORATORY DIMENSION OF FMRI EXPERIMENTS1
The Definition and Typological Model of a Dogwhistle1
BOOK REVIEW: PAPINEAU, D. The Metaphysics of Sensory Experience, (Oxford: Oxford University, 2021, 176 Pages).1
REFERENTIAL USES OF ARABIC NUMERALS1
HERMANN VON HELMHOLTZ, EWALD HERING AND COLOR VISION: A CONTROVERSY OVER STYLES OF REASONING?1
BOOK REVIEW: TODD, P. The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False. Oxford University Press, (Oxford 2021, 224 pp).1
REFLECTIONS ON THE INDEXICAL POINT OF VIEW: ON COGNITIVE SIGNIFICANCE AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS, BY BOJISLAV BOZICKOVIC1
PREDICTIVE PROCESSING AND THE SEMIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE: COMMENTARY TO DUFFLEY1
LOVE AND ESSENCE IN SPINOZA'S ETHICS1
IS CHRIST REALLY CONTRADICTORY? SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONCERNS FROM THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE1
TASTY ROADS TO FLAVOUR1
ON THE BI-MODAL SOLUTION TO THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM OF CHRISTOLOGY1
WALKING THE ROADS TO REFERENCE SOME COMMENTS ON MARIO GÓMEZ TORRENTE1
COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?1
NATURAL KINDS AND OUR SEMANTIC INTUITIONS ALONG THE ROAD1
REPLY TO “PREDICTIVE PROCESSING AND THE SEMIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE: COMMENTARY TO DUFFLEY”0
COMPETING OR HARMONIC? EVOLUTION AND ORIGINAL SIN IN THE AUGUSTINIAN/REFORMED TRADITION0
DIACHRONIC AND EXTERNALLY-SCAFFOLDED SELF-CONTROL IN ADDICTION0
Rotting Tomatoes - Logic for precesses0
RODRIGUEZ-PEREYRA, Gonzalo. Two Arguments for the Identity of Indiscernibles. (Oxford University Press, 2022, 144 pages)0
Darwinian Beauty0
Code words and (re)framing0
Quasi-truth and defective knowledge in science: a critical examination0
A MEMORY-BASED ARGUMENT FOR NON-REDUCTIONISM ABOUT THE TRANSTEMPORAL IDENTITY OF PERSONS0
THE STATUS OF ARGUMENTS IN ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS. A TABLEAUX METHOD0
SOME NOTES ON COGNITIVE DYNAMIC: INSPIRED BY V. BOZICKOVIC’S THE INDEXICAL POINT OF VIEW0
“Believing at will is possible”−or is it? Some remarks on Peels’s “truth depends on belief” cases and voluntariness0
SOCRATIC IGNORANCE, INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY AND INTELLECTUAL AUTONOMY0
VAGUENESS AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL: A NEW REPLY TO VAN INWAGEN0
WHAT’S VOLUNTARY IN STANCE VOLUNTARISM?0
ON THE ORDINARY NOTION OF SUBSTANCE. REPLY TO ABREU ZAVALETA0
ONTOLOGY AND THE POLITICAL ABSOLUTE: A CRITICAL READING OF SPINOZA ON WOMEN0
MODERN CRITICISMS TO NATURAL THEOLOGY AND SWINBURNE’S PROBABILISTIC APPROACH0
ORDINARY KINDS AND ONTOLOGICAL ANGST. REPLY TO DEMARTINI0
ON THE MUTABILITY OF CHRIST0
ON A NEW APPROACH TO PEIRCE’S THREE-VALUE PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC0
ARE CONFLICTING REFERENCE-FIXING INTENTIONS POSSIBLE? REPLY TO MARTONE0
An introduction to Decision Theory for Belief0
A PLEA FOR EXPLANATION0
ADAM SMITH´S HOMO OECONOMICUS0
REPLY TO “COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?”0
ON DESCRIPTIVISM AND NATURAL KIND TERMS. REPLY TO FERNÁNDEZ MORENO0
ERRATUM0
A Simple Theory of Overt and Covert Dogwhistles0
Should God believe the Liar? A non-dialetheist paraconsistent approach to God’s Omniscience0
PROCESS, CONSCIOUSNESS, AND INTEGRATED INFORMATION0
SMITH, Plínio Junqueira, Sextus Empiricus Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. (Cham, Springer, 2022, 367 pages.0
REPLY TO EROS CORAZZA0
REPLY TO “DO LINGUISTIC MEANINGS MEET LINGUISTIC FORM?”0
Special Issue on The Indexical Point of View: INTRODUCTORY NOTES0
ANTHONY KENNY'S CRITICISM OF AQUINAS' FIRST WAY AND THE OMNE QUOD MOVETUR AB ALIO MOVETUR PRINCIPLE0
BOOK REVIEW: GABRIEL, G. Kant. Eine kürze Einführung in das Gesamtwerk. Paderborn, Brill/ Schöningh, 2022, 144 pp).0
Diachronic Constitution0
REFERENCE THEORIES AND THE RELEVANCE OF DESCRIPTIONS0
A Novel Argument for Fatalism0
Similarity as an extension of symmetry and its application to superrationality0
A BUMP IN THE ROAD0
CETERIS PARIBUS PROVISOS, KNOWLEDGE OF REFERENCE-FIXING CONVENTIONS, AND PROPER NAMES. REPLY TO ORLANDO0
Towards a process-based approach to consciousness and collapse in quantum mechanics0
PURE PROCESS REALISM: THE UNIFICATION OF REALISM AND EMPIRICISM0
ON THE ALLEGED ERROR OF FORMAL OBJECTIONS TO NORMATIVE ERROR THEORY0
ERRATUM0
A DEFENCE OF SKEPTICAL THEISM0
The logical bases of contradictory Christology: comments on The Contradictory Christ, Ch. 20
Dogwhistles and Audience Design: A New Definition0
Between Thinking and Acting Fichte’s Deduction of the Concept of Right0
TWO ARGUMENTS FOR THE INCOHERENCE OF NON-TELEOLOGICAL DEISM0
BOZICKOVIC’S THE INDEXICAL POINT OF VIEW. SOME COMMENTS.0
SOME COMMENTS REGARDING FREGE’S CRITERION OF CORRECT INDIRECT SPEECH REPORT IN THE INDEXICAL POINT OF VIEW0
REPLY TO LUDOVIC SOUTIF AND CARLOS MARQUEZ0
THE DE JURE OBJECTION AGAINST BELIEF IN MIRACLES0
ASAY, J. Truthmaking. (Cambridge University Press, 2023, pp. 76).0
ON THE COMPARISONS OF LOGICS IN TERMS OF EXPRESSIVE POWER0
Jennifer Lackey, Criminal Testimonial Injustice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 224pp.0
REPLY TO “REFLEXIVITY, ROLE CONFLICTS, AND THE MEANING OF ENGLISH SELF PRONOUNS”0
AN INTENSIONAL VIEW OF JUDGMENT IN KANT’S KRV0
REPLY TO EDUARDA CALADO BARBOSA0
DOES ATHEISM ENTAIL A CONTRADICTION?0
WILLIAM JAMES AND THE ROLE OF MYSTICISM IN RELIGION0
Frege’s Theory of Types0
REPLY TO JOHN COLLINS’ “A PLEA FOR EXPLANATION”0
GÓMEZ-TORRENTE ON REFERENCE TO ORDINARY SUBSTANCES0
BOOK REVIEW: MARQUES, T. & WIKFORSS, Å (EDS.), Shifting Concepts (Oxford University Press, 2020, 284 Pages).0
CONTEXT-SENSITIVE REFERENCE FIXING AND OBJECTIVITY. REPLY TO BARCELÓ0
BOOK REVIEW: NOVAES, C.D, The Dialogical Roots of Deduction: Historical, Cognitive and Philosophical Perspectives on Reasoning (Cambridge University Press, 2020, 271 pages.)0
Process Metaphysics: Coherences and Consequences0
Special Issue on Dogwhistles0
THE HARSANYI-RAWLS DEBATE: POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY AS DECISION THEORY UNDER UNCERTAINTY0
REPLY TO MARÍA DE PONTE0
Korsgaard's Expanded Regress Argument0
Special Issue on Roads to Reference0
LEARNING FROM ANSELM´S ARGUMENT0
SUTTON’S SOLUTION TO THE GROUNDING PROBLEM0
Does morality require sameness?: a response and question to Jennifer Frey0
NATURAL LANGUAGE AT A CROSSROADS: FORMAL AND PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES IN PHILOSOPHY AND COMPUTER SCIENCE0
REACTION TO ‘LINGUISTIC MEANING MEETS LINGUISTIC FORM IN ACTION’0
THE INFLUENCE OF VANITY ON ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR0
A CAPACITARIAN ACCOUNT OF CULPABILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE0
BOOK REVIEW: SALLES, S. Vagueness as Arbitrariness, (Springer, 2021, 206 Pages).0
DEMONSTRATIVE CONTENTS AND OPAQUE THOUGHTS. REPLY TO VALENTE0
JÓZEF MARIA BOCHEŃSKI’S FORMAL ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMA VIA FROM 19530
TRAVIS-LIKE CASES AND ADEQUATE IDEAS: A CRITICAL NOTICE OF BOZICKOVIC’S THE INDEXICAL POINT OF VIEW0
SKETCH FOR A FORMAL NATURAL THEOLOGY: EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS OF GOD0
NUMERALS, POSITIONALITY, AND REFERENCE FIXING. REPLY TO VIVANCO0
REPLY TO “LINGUISTIC MEANINGS MEET LINGUISTIC FORM”0
DECISION-MAKING IN THE NUTRITION SCIENCES: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR ASSESSING HEALTH CLAIMS0
A MODAL-CAUSAL ARGUMENT FOR A CONCRETE NECESSARY OBJECT0
KANT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF PURE REASON: AN ANALOGY WITH A CHEMICAL EXPERIMENT0
DO CONFLICTING INTENTIONS GIVE RISE TO MULTIPLE DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE? REPLY TO MENA0
LEIBNIZ ON FORCE, CAUSE AND SUBJECT OF MOTION: FROM DE CORPORUM CONCURSU (1678) TO THE BREVIS DEMONSTRATIO (1686)0
COUNTERFACTUAL ANALYSIS BY ALGORITHMIC COMPLEXITY: A METRIC BETWEEN POSSIBLE WORLDS0
QUINE’S PROXY-FUNCTION ARGUMENT FOR THE INDETERMINACY OF REFERENCE AND FREGE’S CAESAR PROBLEM0
Dogwhistling as a narrative-evoking form of communication0
Special Issue: Analytic Philosophy of Religion0
0.021279096603394