Manuscrito

Papers
(The TQCC of Manuscrito is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
THE DE JURE OBJECTION AGAINST BELIEF IN MIRACLES4
FUNDAMENTALITY AND THE EXISTENCE OF GOD3
COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?3
BOOK REVIEW: GABRIEL, G. Kant. Eine kürze Einführung in das Gesamtwerk. Paderborn, Brill/ Schöningh, 2022, 144 pp).2
WILLIAM JAMES AND THE ROLE OF MYSTICISM IN RELIGION2
KANT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF PURE REASON: AN ANALOGY WITH A CHEMICAL EXPERIMENT2
ISSUES CONCERNING LINGUISTIC MEANING AND FORM: INTRODUCTORY REMARKS2
BOOK REVIEW: MARQUES, T. & WIKFORSS, Å (EDS.), Shifting Concepts (Oxford University Press, 2020, 284 Pages).2
Diachronic Constitution1
REPLY TO “COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?”1
PROCESS, CONSCIOUSNESS, AND INTEGRATED INFORMATION1
VAGUENESS AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL: A NEW REPLY TO VAN INWAGEN1
ON THE COMPARISONS OF LOGICS IN TERMS OF EXPRESSIVE POWER1
TWO ARGUMENTS FOR THE INCOHERENCE OF NON-TELEOLOGICAL DEISM1
SUTTON’S SOLUTION TO THE GROUNDING PROBLEM1
REPLY TO “DO LINGUISTIC MEANINGS MEET LINGUISTIC FORM?”1
SPECIAL ISSUE ON SCIENTIFIC PROCESS ONTOLOGY AND METAPHYSICS - A THEMATIC INTRODUCTION1
PREDICTIVE PROCESSING AND THE SEMIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE: COMMENTARY TO DUFFLEY1
REPLY TO EDUARDA CALADO BARBOSA1
REPLY TO LUDOVIC SOUTIF AND CARLOS MARQUEZ1
DECISION-MAKING IN THE NUTRITION SCIENCES: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR ASSESSING HEALTH CLAIMS1
ADVERBIAL MODIFICATION, FACTS, AND EVENTS: A PREDICATE MODIFIERS’ APPROACH1
An introduction to Decision Theory for Belief1
LEARNING FROM ANSELM´S ARGUMENT1
SOME COMMENTS REGARDING FREGE’S CRITERION OF CORRECT INDIRECT SPEECH REPORT IN THE INDEXICAL POINT OF VIEW1
SMITH, Plínio Junqueira, Sextus Empiricus Neo-Pyrrhonism: Skepticism as a Rationally Ordered Experience. (Cham, Springer, 2022, 367 pages.0
Between Thinking and Acting Fichte’s Deduction of the Concept of Right0
DO LINGUISTIC MEANINGS MEET LINGUISTIC FORM?0
ANTHONY KENNY'S CRITICISM OF AQUINAS' FIRST WAY AND THE OMNE QUOD MOVETUR AB ALIO MOVETUR PRINCIPLE0
SKETCH FOR A FORMAL NATURAL THEOLOGY: EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS OF GOD0
Building the common ground with demonstratives0
ON THE MUTABILITY OF CHRIST0
A Question Will Never Walk Alone0
BOOK REVIEW: SALLES, S. Vagueness as Arbitrariness, (Springer, 2021, 206 Pages).0
NA-NA, NA-NA, BOO-BOO, THE ACCURACY OF YOUR PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEFS IS DOO-DOO0
TRAVIS-LIKE CASES AND ADEQUATE IDEAS: A CRITICAL NOTICE OF BOZICKOVIC’S THE INDEXICAL POINT OF VIEW0
BOOK REVIEW: TODD, P. The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False. Oxford University Press, (Oxford 2021, 224 pp).0
Darwinian Beauty0
QUINE’S PROXY-FUNCTION ARGUMENT FOR THE INDETERMINACY OF REFERENCE AND FREGE’S CAESAR PROBLEM0
Does Identity Make Sense?0
Should God believe the Liar? A non-dialetheist paraconsistent approach to God’s Omniscience0
Special Issue on The Indexical Point of View: INTRODUCTORY NOTES0
QUASI-FIDEISM AND SCEPTICAL FIDEISM0
REFLECTIONS ON THE INDEXICAL POINT OF VIEW: ON COGNITIVE SIGNIFICANCE AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS, BY BOJISLAV BOZICKOVIC0
Précis of Knowing What Things Are: An Inquiry Based-Approach0
A CAPACITARIAN ACCOUNT OF CULPABILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE0
Dogwhistles and Audience Design: A New Definition0
IS CHRIST REALLY CONTRADICTORY? SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONCERNS FROM THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE0
THE INFLUENCE OF VANITY ON ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR0
Jennifer Lackey, Criminal Testimonial Injustice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 224pp.0
ERRATUM0
Deflationism about Truth-Directedness0
Does morality require sameness?: a response and question to Jennifer Frey0
NATURAL LANGUAGE AT A CROSSROADS: FORMAL AND PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES IN PHILOSOPHY AND COMPUTER SCIENCE0
ADAM SMITH´S HOMO OECONOMICUS0
DIACHRONIC AND EXTERNALLY-SCAFFOLDED SELF-CONTROL IN ADDICTION0
Code words and (re)framing0
EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT AS EMERGENT PROCESSES0
RODRIGUEZ-PEREYRA, Gonzalo. Two Arguments for the Identity of Indiscernibles. (Oxford University Press, 2022, 144 pages)0
Mauro Dorato, Science and Representative Democracy: Experts and Citizens, Bloomsbury Academic, 2023, 200pp., £85.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781350277724.0
Special Issue on Dogwhistles0
A PLEA FOR EXPLANATION0
A MODAL-CAUSAL ARGUMENT FOR A CONCRETE NECESSARY OBJECT0
ERRATUM0
ASAY, J. Truthmaking. (Cambridge University Press, 2023, pp. 76).0
ONTOLOGY AND THE POLITICAL ABSOLUTE: A CRITICAL READING OF SPINOZA ON WOMEN0
REPLY TO “LINGUISTIC MEANINGS MEET LINGUISTIC FORM”0
ERRATUM0
LINGUISTIC MEANING MEETS LINGUISTIC FORM IN ACTION0
Erratum0
Properly Answering the Question What is Knowledge of What Things Are? On André Abath’s Erotetic View0
Special Issue: Analytic Philosophy of Religion0
DOES ATHEISM ENTAIL A CONTRADICTION?0
Rotting Tomatoes - Logic for precesses0
BOZICKOVIC’S THE INDEXICAL POINT OF VIEW. SOME COMMENTS.0
REPLY TO EROS CORAZZA0
CHALLENGING THE PROCESS VIEW OF ACTION0
JÓZEF MARIA BOCHEŃSKI’S FORMAL ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMA VIA FROM 19530
Towards a process-based approach to consciousness and collapse in quantum mechanics0
The logical bases of contradictory Christology: comments on The Contradictory Christ, Ch. 20
GHINS, Michel. Scientific Realism and Laws of Nature: A Metaphysics of Causal Powers. (Springer, 2024, xviii + 211 pp.)0
REPLY TO “PREDICTIVE PROCESSING AND THE SEMIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE: COMMENTARY TO DUFFLEY”0
LOVE AND ESSENCE IN SPINOZA'S ETHICS0
ON A NEW APPROACH TO PEIRCE’S THREE-VALUE PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC0
ENCOUNTERING GENUINE CHANGE. REFLECTIONS ON SPEAKING ABOUT WHAT IS IN MOVEMENT0
Korsgaard's Expanded Regress Argument0
REFLEXIVITY, ROLE CONFLICTS, AND THE MEANING OF ENGLISH SELF PRONOUNS0
A DEFENCE OF SKEPTICAL THEISM0
Knowing What Truth Is: Some Brief Remarks on the Erotetic Account0
The Thing That Should (Not) Be: On André J. Abath’s Ways of Knowing0
HISTORICAL THEORY OF REFERENCE AND THE CRITERIA OF IDENTITY: The Clash of Kripke's and Linnebo's Theories of Reference0
CATEGORIZING INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY ACCOUNTS: A taxonomic approach to the debate0
REACTION TO ‘LINGUISTIC MEANING MEETS LINGUISTIC FORM IN ACTION’0
Process Metaphysics: Coherences and Consequences0
COUNTERFACTUAL ANALYSIS BY ALGORITHMIC COMPLEXITY: A METRIC BETWEEN POSSIBLE WORLDS0
A Novel Argument for Fatalism0
How to Redo Things with Words: Deniability and the Determinants of Illocutionary Force0
The Definition and Typological Model of a Dogwhistle0
Frege’s Theory of Types0
FICTIONAL MINDLESSNESS AND THE PROBLEM OF UNREPORTABILITY0
ON THE BI-MODAL SOLUTION TO THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM OF CHRISTOLOGY0
LINGUISTIC MEANINGS MEET LINGUISTIC FORM0
A MEMORY-BASED ARGUMENT FOR NON-REDUCTIONISM ABOUT THE TRANSTEMPORAL IDENTITY OF PERSONS0
Quasi-truth and defective knowledge in science: a critical examination0
ON THE ALLEGED ERROR OF FORMAL OBJECTIONS TO NORMATIVE ERROR THEORY0
COMPETING OR HARMONIC? EVOLUTION AND ORIGINAL SIN IN THE AUGUSTINIAN/REFORMED TRADITION0
REPLY TO JOHN COLLINS’ “A PLEA FOR EXPLANATION”0
AWE AT NATURAL BEAUTY AS DEFEASIBLE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD,0
Erotetic Knowledge and Deal-Breaker Propositions0
CAUSAL-PATTERN THEORIES OF CONSCIOUSNESS: A CHALLENGE AND A META-CAUSAL RESPONSE0
A DEFENSE OF LEIBNIZ’S MAIN DEFINITION OF COMPLETE CONCEPTS0
Dogwhistling as a narrative-evoking form of communication0
REPLY TO PETER LUDLOW0
MODERN CRITICISMS TO NATURAL THEOLOGY AND SWINBURNE’S PROBABILISTIC APPROACH0
PURE PROCESS REALISM: THE UNIFICATION OF REALISM AND EMPIRICISM0
BOOK REVIEW: PAPINEAU, D. The Metaphysics of Sensory Experience, (Oxford: Oxford University, 2021, 176 Pages).0
SOCRATIC IGNORANCE, INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY AND INTELLECTUAL AUTONOMY0
REPLY TO “REFLEXIVITY, ROLE CONFLICTS, AND THE MEANING OF ENGLISH SELF PRONOUNS”0
REPLY TO MARÍA DE PONTE0
SOME NOTES ON COGNITIVE DYNAMIC: INSPIRED BY V. BOZICKOVIC’S THE INDEXICAL POINT OF VIEW0
A FORMAL-LOGICAL APPROACH TO THE CONCEPT OF GOD0
THE STATUS OF ARGUMENTS IN ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS. A TABLEAUX METHOD0
A Simple Theory of Overt and Covert Dogwhistles0
“Believing at will is possible”−or is it? Some remarks on Peels’s “truth depends on belief” cases and voluntariness0
0.053266048431396