Supreme Court Review

Papers
(The TQCC of Supreme Court Review is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-02-01 to 2024-02-01.)
ArticleCitations
The Roberts Court and the Transformation of Constitutional Protections for Religion: A Statistical Portrait6
Precedent and Discretion5
The Roberts Court and Administrative Law3
The Supreme Court’s Challenge to Civil Society2
Opportunistic Originalism: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization2
Living Textualism1
Disestablishing the Establishment Clause0
Eradicating Bush-League Arguments Root and Branch: The Article II Independent-State-Legislature Notion and Related Rubbish0
The Neglected Origins of the Hearsay Rule in American Slavery: Recovering Queen v. Hepburn0
Showdown at Cedar Point: “Sole and Despotic Dominion” Gains Ground0
Too Much History: Castro-Huerta and the Problem of Change In Indian Law0
Sexual Orientation and the Dynamics of Discrimination0
Front Matter0
Reading Regents and the Political Significance of Law0
Focusing the CFAA in Van Buren0
Front Matter0
Manufacturing Outliers0
The Anti-Carolene Court0
Front Matter0
Mahanoy v. B.L. & First Amendment “Leeway”0
The Unitary Executive: Past, Present, Future0
What Christianity Loses When Conservative Christians Win at The Supreme Court0
Scalia’s Slip0
The Hidden Judicial Springs of U.S. Foreign Policy0
Safety, Health, and Union Access in Cedar Point Nursery0
The Inside-Out Constitution: Department of CommercevNew York0
On Power and the Law: McGirtv. Oklahoma0
Establishment Clause Appeasement0
“Not a Single Privilege Is Annexed to His Character”: Necessary and Proper Executive Privileges and Immunities0
Not in the Room Where It Happens: Adversariness, Politicization, and Little Sisters of the Poor0
Why Restrict Abortion? Expanding the Frame on June Medical0
What Should Be National and What Should Be Local in American Judicial Review0
Executive Decisions After Arthrex0
Advocacy History in the Supreme Court0
Front Matter0
Injury In Fact, Transformed0
To Promote the General Welfare: Why Madison Matters0
Trademarks, Hate Speech, and Solving a Puzzle of Viewpoint Bias0
Late-Stage Textualism0
Rights, Remedies, and Texas’s S.B. 80
Mississippi Goddamn: Flowers v Mississippi’s Cheap Racial Justice0
The Anti-Democratic Major Questions Doctrine0
The Institutionalist Turn In Copyright0
Surveillance, State Secrets, and the Future of Constitutional Rights0
0.035515069961548