OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Philosophy & Public Affairs is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)

Article	Citations
On statistical criteria of algorithmic fairness	52
Virtue Signaling and Moral Progress	35
What's So Special About Human Dignity?	16
Distributing Responsibility	9
Government Policy Experiments and the Ethics of Randomization	8
An Argument for All‐Luck Egalitarianism	8
Algorithmic Fairness and Base Rate Tracking	8
Why You Should Vote to Change the Outcome	7
In Defense of National Climate Change Responsibility: A Reply to the Fairness Objection	7
Guilt Without Perceived Wrongdoing	6
Reconciling Algorithmic Fairness Criteria	6
Making the All‐Affected Principle Safe for Democracy	6
Boundary Policing	6
Little Republics: Authority and the Political Nature of the Firm	6
The Possibility of Democratic Autonomy	5
The Power of Numbers: On Agential Power‐With‐Others Without Power‐Over‐Others	5
Demographic Objections to Epistocracy: A Generalization	4
Ethical Consumerism, Democratic Values, and Justice	4
Socialism Unrevised: A Reply to Roemer on Marx, Exploitation, Solidarity, Worker Control	4
Reciprocity Without Compliance	3
What is a speaker owed?	3
Taking offense: An emotion reconsidered	3
Market Harms and Market Benefits	3
The Value of Unity	2
Honesty and Discretion	2

“The Language of the Unheard”: Rioting as a Speech Act	2
Legitimate Injustice and Acting for Others	2
Wasted Potential: The Value of a Life and the Significance of What Could Have Been	2
The Wrong of Wrongful Manipulation	1
Time for Caution	1
The Etiquette of Equality	1
	1
Limited Assurance	1
Partiality, Identity, and Procreation	1
Rawls and the Future: On the Possibility of Cooperation across Time	1
Fair Play, Coercion, and the Costs of Children: A Reply to Olsaretti	1
Beyond the Scope of Consent	1
Feasibility as Deliberation‐Worthiness	1
Notes on the Contributors	0
Issue Information	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
	0
Social Science, Policy and Democracy	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
Political Equality and Epistemic Constraints on Voting	0
Editor's Note	0
	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
Refusing Protection	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
On Moral Pride as Taking Responsibility for the Good	0
Why Socializing the Costs of Children Is Fair to Parents: A Rejoinder to Hohl	0
	0
Joint Ought	0
Issue Information	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
High Risk, Low Reward: A Challenge to the Astronomical Value of Existential Risk Mitigation	0
A Pluralist Approach to Joint Responsibility	0
	0
Issue Information	0
Issue Information	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
Repugnance and Perfection	0
Assisting the Assisters: The Comparative Claims of Afghan Refugees	0
The Role of Civility in Political Disobedience	0
Issue Information	0
	0
Editor's Note	0
Issue Information	0
How to Assess Claims in Multiple‐Option Choice Sets	0
	0
	0
Issue Information	0
Notes on the Contributors	0

Notes on the Contributors	0
Editor's Note	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
Corrigendum	0
	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
Editor's Note	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
Which Majority Should Rule?	0
A Note from the Editor	0
Issue Information	0
Rescuing the Market from Communal Criticism	0
Notes on the Contributors	0
Issue Information	0
Mobilizing Falsehoods	0
Bad Question!	0
Issue Information	0
	0
	0
Issue Information	0
Issue Information	0
	0
	0
Proper Address and Epistemic Conditions for Acting on Sexual Consent	0
	0
	0
Issue Information	0
Issue Information	0
Issue Information	0