Taxon

Papers
(The H4-Index of Taxon is 17. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network65
World Flora Online: Placing taxonomists at the heart of a definitive and comprehensive global resource on the world's plants56
A new taxonomic backbone for the infrageneric classification of the species‐rich genus Silene (Caryophyllaceae)52
A compendium of generic names of agarics and Agaricales37
A new subfamily classification of the Citrus family (Rutaceae) based on six nuclear and plastid markers34
Revised classification of Acanthaceae and worldwide dichotomous keys31
Phylogenetic lineages and the role of hybridization as driving force of evolution in grass supertribe Poodae29
The classification of the Compositae: A tribute to Vicki Ann Funk (1947–2019)26
Linnaeus's folly – phylogeny, evolution and classification of Sedum (Crassulaceae) and Crassulaceae subfamily Sempervivoideae26
Molecular phylogeny of the Mammilloid clade (Cactaceae) resolves the monophyly of Mammillaria23
Phylogenetic relationships and sectional delineation within Gentiana (Gentianaceae)23
Evaluating shortfalls and spatial accuracy of biodiversity documentation in the Atlantic Forest, the most diverse and threatened Brazilian phytogeographic domain22
Phylogenomics supported by geometric morphometrics reveals delimitation of sexual species within the polyploid apomictic Ranunculus auricomus complex (Ranunculaceae)22
“Rhodes‐” must fall: Some of the consequences of colonialism for botany and plant nomenclature22
A prickly puzzle: Generic delimitations in the Carduus‐Cirsium group (Compositae: Cardueae: Carduinae)22
Molecular phylogenetics of the Dissochaeta alliance (Melastomataceae): Redefining tribe Dissochaeteae20
If “Rhodes‐” must fall, who shall fall next?17
(119–122) Proposals to amend Articles 51 and 56 and Division III, to allow the rejection of culturally offensive and inappropriate names17
0.09199595451355