Reading Research Quarterly

Papers
(The TQCC of Reading Research Quarterly is 6. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-02-01 to 2025-02-01.)
ArticleCitations
Effect of an Instructional Program in Foundational Reading Skills on Early Literacy Development of Students in Kindergarten and First Grade156
The Good Cops, Bad Cops, Bullets, and Wounds: Toward Culturally Sustaining Prison Abolition Literacies in Early Childhood Education42
Toward a Cultural Sustenance View of Reading41
Effects of Story Read‐Aloud Lessons on Literacy Development in the Early Grades: Experimental Evidence From Nigeria38
Dimensionality of Morphological Knowledge—Evidence from Norwegian Third Graders28
25
How Chinese–English Bilingual Fourth Graders Draw on Syntactic Awareness in Reading Comprehension: Within‐ and Cross‐Language Effects25
What Makes Reading Difficult? An Investigation of the Contributions of Passage, Task, and Reader Characteristics on Comprehension Performance25
Morphological Processing in Children with Developmental Dyslexia: A Visual Masked Priming Study23
Issue Information23
DisCrit Literacies: Early Childhood Teachers Critically Reading School as Text and Imagining an Otherwise22
AlgoRitmo Literacies In Gaming: Leveraging Chicanx Praxis To Reimagine AI Systems20
Issue Information20
Issue Information20
Skewed Artificial Intelligence: Flagging Embedded Cultural Practices in Children's Stories Featuring “Alice and Sparkle19
Multiple Approaches to “Appropriateness”: A Mixed‐Methods Study of Elementary Teachers' Dispositions Toward African American Language as They Teach a Dialect‐Shifting Curriculum18
Gopher Tales: Re/Storying for Re/Worlding17
Towards Disruptive Maker Literacies Beyond Neurotypical, Gendered Mindsets17
Secondary Teachers' Adolescent Literacy Efficacy and Professional Learning Considerations16
Phonological Awareness Materials in Utah Kindergartens: A Case Study in the Science of Reading15
Digital Edible Literacies: Ephemeral and Highly Affective15
Is a Phone‐Based Language and Literacy Assessment a Reliable and Valid Measure of Children's Reading Skills in Low‐Resource Settings?14
Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) as a Kindergarten Predictor of Future Reading in English: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis13
Literary Reading on Paper and Screens: Associations Between Reading Habits and Preferences and Experiencing Meaningfulness13
Guitarras on the Rise: Framing Youth Sierreño Bands as Translingual Ingenuity13
Relating Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatized Naming to Phonological and Orthographic Processing of Written Words: Cross‐sequential Evidence from French13
The Word Complexity of Primary‐Level Texts: Differences Between First and Third Grade in Widely Used Curricula13
Where Is the Evidence? Looking Back to Jeanne Chall and Enduring Debates About the Science of Reading12
Ready, Set, Write: Early Learning Standards for Writing in the Common Core Era11
The Role of Neural and Genetic Processes in Learning to Read and Specific Reading Disabilities: Implications for Instruction11
Teaching Reading Is More Than a Science: It’s Also an Art11
Print Learning: A Theoretical Framework for the Role of Children's Learning about the Orthography in the Development of Reading Skill11
Issue Information10
Disrupting Monolingual Ideologies: Constructing Biliterate Composing Practices in a Second‐grade Classroom10
When Treatment Adherence Matters: Interactions Among Treatment Adherence, Instructional Quality, and Student Characteristics on Reading Outcomes10
Early Identification of Children with Dyslexia: Variables Differentially Predict Poor Reading Versus Unexpected Poor Reading10
Issue Information10
The Challenge of Cultivating National and Cosmopolitan Identities Through Literature: Insights From Singapore Schools10
Supporting Knowledge and Language Acquisition of Secondary Emergent Bilinguals through Social Studies Instruction9
Technology supports in the UDL framework: Removable scaffolds or permanent new literacies?9
The Internet Doesn't Exist in the Sky: Literacy, AI, and the Digital Middle Passage9
Professional Development in Reading Comprehension: A Meta‐analysis of the Effects on Teachers and Students9
8
Denaturalizing “Intelligence” in Higher Education: AI as a Rupture to Imagining and Manifesting Sustainable and Anti‐colonial Literacies8
Issue Information8
Issue Information8
Taking Responsibility for Meaning and Mattering: An Agential Realist Approach to Generative AI and Literacy8
Volume 58 Editorial Introduction8
8
To Become an Object Among Objects: Generative Artificial “Intelligence,” Writing, and Linguistic White Supremacy8
8
8
7
A Comparative Case Study of Engineers' Literacy Practices and Implications for Transformative Disciplinary Literacy Pedagogies in Engineering Education7
First‐Year Teachers’ Informational Reading Instruction: Prevalence, Quality, and Characteristics7
Adult Supports for Preschool Writers During Learning Centers7
Tracking the Relations Between Children’s Reading and Emotional Health Across Time: Evidence From Four Large Longitudinal Studies7
Is the Science of Reading Just the Science of Reading English?7
Strategic Text Processing Across Mediums: A Verbal Protocol Study7
Understanding Within‐ and Cross‐Language Relations Among Language, Preliteracy Skills, and Word Reading in Bilingual Learners: Evidence From the Science of Reading7
Toward Border‐Crossing Biliteracies: Pláticas of Midwest Transnational Latinx Families Reading and (Re)writing the World7
Using Construction‐Integration Theory to Interpret Reading Comprehension Instruction for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis7
Conflict or Conversation? Media Portrayals of the Science of Reading6
Corrigendum6
Forty Years of Reading Intervention Research for Elementary Students with or at Risk for Dyslexia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis6
Getting KnERDI with Language: Examining Teachers’ Knowledge for Enhancing Reading Development in Code‐Based and Meaning‐Based Domains6
Text Types and Their Relation to Efficacy in Beginning Reading Interventions6
Competing Paradigms: Employing Quantitative Methods to Operationalize and Validate a Pedagogy of Critical Literacy6
0.037988901138306