Nous

Papers
(The TQCC of Nous is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Weyl and two kinds of potential domains28
A paradox for tiny probabilities and enormous values22
Humes definitions of virtue20
Proleptic praise: A social function analysis20
The simplicity of physical laws16
Metaphysics of risk and luck13
13
Happiness and well‐being: Is it all in your head? Evidence from the folk12
Indirect compatibilism12
Semantic reasons10
From modality to millianism9
9
Criteria of identity without sortals8
8
Higher‐order evidence and the duty to double‐check7
Logic will get you from A to B, imagination will take you anywhere7
Blameworthiness, desert, and luck7
Parity, moral options, and the weights of reasons7
Radical parochialism about reference7
Controlling our reasons7
The bayesian and the abductivist6
Knowing what to do6
Respect for others' risk attitudes and the long‐run future6
Epistemic practices: A unified account of epistemic and zetetic normativity6
Center indifference and skepticism5
A defense of back‐end doxastic voluntarism5
Symmetry lost: A modal ontological argument for atheism?5
Mundane hallucinations and new wave relationalism5
Reflecting on diachronic Dutch books5
Absolution of a Causal Decision Theorist5
Indexicality, Bayesian background and self‐location in fine‐tuning arguments for the multiverse5
Phenomenal knowledge and phenomenal causality4
4
Constraints, you, and your victims4
Expected value, to a point: Moral decision‐making under background uncertainty4
Issue Information4
4
Epistemic akrasia: No apology required4
How chance explains3
Degrees of consciousness3
Tropes and qualitative change3
‘I didn't know it was you’: The impersonal grounds of relational normativity3
What is social structural explanation? A causal account3
Issue Information3
The problem of nomological harmony3
3
Evidentialism, justification, and knowledge‐first3
Can we repudiate ontology altogether?3
No fact of the middle3
Disagreement & classification in comparative cognitive science3
1.4154210090637