Minerva

Papers
(The TQCC of Minerva is 5. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Strategic Bureaucracy: The Convergence of Bureaucratic and Strategic Management Logics in the Organizational Restructuring of Universities44
A Review of Ian Scoones, Navigating Uncertainty: Radical Rethinking for a Turbulent World41
The Platformization of Science: Towards a Scientific Digital Platform Taxonomy29
Research Assessment Reform as Collective Action Problem: Contested Framings of Research System Transformation27
Katherine E. Smith, Justyna Bandola-Gill, Nasar Meer, Ellen Stewart and Richard Watermeyer, The Impact Agenda: Controversies, Consequences and Challenges25
Eric S. Hintz, American Independent Inventors in an Era of Corporate R&D24
Acceptable Use: Morality and Credibility Struggles in Swedish 1960s Alcohol and Illicit Drug (Ab)use Research and Policy22
Professionalizing the Professional Bureaucracy: On Training and Expertise for Leadership Positions in Universities18
The University: Exalted Institution and Ruined Organization17
Public-Private Partnerships and the Landscape of Neglected Tropical Disease Research: The Shifting Logic and Spaces of Knowledge Production16
Writing in the Sciences: Scientists, Scientific Writers, and the Division of Writing Labour16
Retraction Stigma and its Communication via Retraction Notices12
Digital Twins of the Earth Between Vision and Fiction11
“A Militia of Anarchists Run by a General”. A Case of Scientific Policy Advice in Austria During the Pandemic10
The Rise of Global Health Emergency Governance10
Entrepreneurialism Meets Sustainability: Exploring Tensions in the Transition to Sustainable Entrepreneurial Universities10
Wissenschaftsreflexion: What is it? What is the need for it? Contemporary challenges for studies in science10
From Student to Scholar: Peer Evaluation in the Berlin Philological Seminar10
The Feeling Rules of Peer Review: Defining, Displaying, and Managing Emotions in Evaluation for Research Funding9
Dynamics of International Research Collaboration in Higher Education in the Global Majority Systems: Evidence from Three Contexts9
Investigating Knowledge Flows in Scientific Communities: The Potential of Bibliometric Methods9
Making Sense of Science, University, and Industry: Sensemaking Narratives of Finnish and Israeli Scientists9
Navigating Societal Impact: Strategic Management in Horizon 2020 SSH Projects9
Territorial Inequalities and (de)Concentration of Public Investment in Science: A Study on CONICET (Argentina) and the Tensions Between Academic Excellence and Equity8
Mark Solovey and Christian Dayé, eds., Cold War Social Science: Transnational Entanglements8
Big Science, Big Trouble? Understanding Conflict in and Around Big Science Projects and Networks8
Could I Write Like Carol Weiss?8
Social Innovation: A Retrospective Perspective7
Who Am I? The Influence of Knowledge Networks on PhD Students’ Formation of a Researcher Role Identity7
New Arguments for a pure lottery in Research Funding: A Sketch for a Future Science Policy Without Time-Consuming Grant Competitions6
Conception and Interpretation of Interdisciplinarity in Research Practice: Findings from Group Discussions in the Emerging Field of Digital Transformation6
Towards the Recognition of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Researchers6
Peter Scott, Retreat or Resolution? Tackling the Crisis of Mass Higher Education5
A Masked Truth? Public Discussions about Face Masks on a French Health Forum5
Understanding Conceptual Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Policy: The Role of Policymaking Conditions5
“Are You a TA Practitioner, Then?” – Identity Constructions in Post-Normal Science5
Correction to: Conjuration and Conspiracy. The Controversy Over the German Covid Policy as a Mediumistic Trial, or: The Medium is the Mess5
Mapping the German Diamond Open Access Journal Landscape5
Diving into Relevance: How Deep Sea Researchers Articulate Societal Relevance within their Epistemic Living Spaces5
0.073279857635498