International Review of Administrative Sciences

Papers
(The TQCC of International Review of Administrative Sciences is 7. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Tracing divergence in crisis governance: responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden compared80
The journey of participatory budgeting: a systematic literature review and future research directions45
Two routes to precarious success: Australia, New Zealand, COVID-19 and the politics of crisis governance39
Opportunity management of the COVID-19 pandemic: testing the crisis from a global perspective35
Understanding the evolution of open government data research: towards open data sustainability and smartness31
High-stakes crisis management in the Low Countries: Comparing government responses to COVID-1927
Gender budgeting in public financial management: a literature review and research agenda24
A comparative study of COVID-19 responses in South Korea and Japan: political nexus triad and policy responses24
Public governance, agility and pandemics: a case study of the UK response to COVID-1923
Sustainable development goals in public administrations: Enabling conditions in local governments23
Government technological capacity and public–private partnerships regarding digital service delivery: evidence from Chinese cities22
Urban platforms as a mode of governance21
Governing healthcare in India: a policy capacity perspective20
Do transparency mechanisms reduce government corruption? A meta-analysis18
Understanding drivers of illiberal entrenchment at critical junctures: institutional responses to COVID-19 in Hungary and Poland18
A cascade of exclusion: administrative burdens and access to citizenship in the case of Argentina’s National Identity Document17
The politics of crisis management by regional and international organizations in fighting against a global pandemic: the member states at a crossroads17
Seeking opportunities from crisis? China’s governance responses to the COVID-19 pandemic17
Country, sector and method effects in studying remunicipalization: a meta-analysis17
Intergovernmental veto points in crisis management: Italy and Spain facing the COVID-19 pandemic16
Innovative work behaviors and networking across government16
Street-level bureaucracy in weak state institutions: a systematic review of the literature15
Government choice between contract termination and contract expiration in re-municipalization: a case of historical recurrence?15
Building administrative capacity for development: limits and prospects15
Drivers of service delivery modes in Dutch local government: an analysis over time and across domains14
Delegating diplomacy: rhetoric across agents in the United Nations General Assembly13
Does process matter more for predicting trust in government? Participation, performance, and process, in local government in Japan13
Discursive framing and organizational venues: mechanisms of artificial intelligence policy adoption13
Participatory budgeting and government efficiency: evidence from municipal governments in South Korea13
Re-municipalization of local public services: incidence, causes and prospects12
The digital communication tools and citizens' relationship with local governments: a comparison of Georgian and Polish cities10
Digitization and urban governance: The city as a reflection of its data infrastructure10
Government spending and economic growth in the Middle East and North Africa region9
Interpreting digital governance at the municipal level: Evidence from smart city projects in Belgium9
Analysis of the perception of digital government and artificial intelligence in the public sector in Jalisco, Mexico9
How citizens’ dissatisfaction with street-level bureaucrats’ exercise of discretion leads to the alternative supply of public services: the case of Israeli marriage registrars9
How do international bureaucrats affect policy outputs? Studying administrative influence strategies in international organizations9
Staff recruitment and geographical representation in international organizations9
The unsustainable political economy of investor–state dispute settlement mechanisms19
Rationale and process transparency do not reduce perceived red tape: evidence from a survey experiment8
The relationship between public service employees’ personal resources and psychological well-being8
Explaining sentiment shifts in UN system annual reporting: a longitudinal comparison of UNHCR, UNRWA and IOM8
International bureaucracy and the United Nations system: introduction8
Policy recommendations of international bureaucracies: the importance of country-specificity8
From the participatory turn of administrations to the bureaucratisation of participatory democracy: study based on the French case7
Policy capacity matters for capacity development: comparing teacher in-service training and career advancement in basic education systems of India and China7
Smart criminal justice: Phenomena and normative requirements7
Successful remunicipalization processes in Italian waste management: Triggers, key success factors, and results7
Public–private partnership in a smart city: A curious case in Japan7
External control mechanisms and red tape: testing the roles of external audit and evaluation on red tape in quasi-governmental organizations7
Lessons from public administration for global governance: Conclusions of the special issue on “International Bureaucracy and the United Nations System.”7
Strategic alignment of open government initiatives in Andalusia7
Exploring the negative impacts of artificial intelligence in government: the dark side of intelligent algorithms and cognitive machines7
Does psychological empowerment condition the impact of public service motivation on perceived organizational performance? Evidence from the US federal government7
What brings contracting back in-house? A synthesis of international evidence7
The effect of pay for performance on work attitudes in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors: A panel study from South Korea7
0.028836011886597