International Review of Administrative Sciences

Papers
(The TQCC of International Review of Administrative Sciences is 6. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Tracing divergence in crisis governance: responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden compared70
Two routes to precarious success: Australia, New Zealand, COVID-19 and the politics of crisis governance38
The journey of participatory budgeting: a systematic literature review and future research directions28
Opportunity management of the COVID-19 pandemic: testing the crisis from a global perspective26
Understanding the evolution of open government data research: towards open data sustainability and smartness23
High-stakes crisis management in the Low Countries: Comparing government responses to COVID-1922
A comparative study of COVID-19 responses in South Korea and Japan: political nexus triad and policy responses20
Governing healthcare in India: a policy capacity perspective18
Understanding drivers of illiberal entrenchment at critical junctures: institutional responses to COVID-19 in Hungary and Poland17
Government technological capacity and public–private partnerships regarding digital service delivery: evidence from Chinese cities17
Gender budgeting in public financial management: a literature review and research agenda16
The politics of crisis management by regional and international organizations in fighting against a global pandemic: the member states at a crossroads15
Urban platforms as a mode of governance15
Country, sector and method effects in studying remunicipalization: a meta-analysis15
Building administrative capacity for development: limits and prospects14
Intergovernmental veto points in crisis management: Italy and Spain facing the COVID-19 pandemic14
Seeking opportunities from crisis? China’s governance responses to the COVID-19 pandemic14
Public governance, agility and pandemics: a case study of the UK response to COVID-1913
Do transparency mechanisms reduce government corruption? A meta-analysis13
A cascade of exclusion: administrative burdens and access to citizenship in the case of Argentina’s National Identity Document13
Drivers of service delivery modes in Dutch local government: an analysis over time and across domains13
Re-municipalization of local public services: incidence, causes and prospects12
The influence of team members’ motivation and leaders’ behaviour on scientific knowledge sharing in universities12
Delegating diplomacy: rhetoric across agents in the United Nations General Assembly12
Discursive framing and organizational venues: mechanisms of artificial intelligence policy adoption11
Participatory budgeting and government efficiency: evidence from municipal governments in South Korea11
Innovative work behaviors and networking across government11
Towards accounting harmonization in Europe: a multinational survey among budget experts11
Government choice between contract termination and contract expiration in re-municipalization: a case of historical recurrence?11
How do international bureaucrats affect policy outputs? Studying administrative influence strategies in international organizations9
Increasing the cost of participation: red tape and public officials’ attitudes toward public participation9
Between life and death: organizational change in central state bureaucracies in cross-national comparison8
Street-level bureaucracy in weak state institutions: a systematic review of the literature8
Explaining sentiment shifts in UN system annual reporting: a longitudinal comparison of UNHCR, UNRWA and IOM8
Sustainable development goals in public administrations: Enabling conditions in local governments8
Corruption and the quality of transportation infrastructure: evidence from the US states8
How a participatory process with inclusive structural design allocates resources toward poor neighborhoods: the case of participatory budgeting in Seoul, South Korea8
Does process matter more for predicting trust in government? Participation, performance, and process, in local government in Japan8
Building administrative capacity under developmental states in Chile and Singapore: a comparative perspective7
Policy recommendations of international bureaucracies: the importance of country-specificity7
Staff recruitment and geographical representation in international organizations7
International bureaucracy and the United Nations system: introduction7
The relationship between public service employees’ personal resources and psychological well-being7
Digitization and urban governance: The city as a reflection of its data infrastructure7
Technology symbolization: political mechanism of local e-government adoption and implementation7
How citizens’ dissatisfaction with street-level bureaucrats’ exercise of discretion leads to the alternative supply of public services: the case of Israeli marriage registrars7
Impact of Asian cultural values upon leadership roles and styles7
Changing civil servants’ behaviour concerning the opening of governmental data: evaluating the effect of a game by comparing civil servants’ intentions before and after a game intervention7
Quality of governance and political support in China, Japan, and South Korea6
Rationale and process transparency do not reduce perceived red tape: evidence from a survey experiment6
Lessons from public administration for global governance: Conclusions of the special issue on “International Bureaucracy and the United Nations System.”6
Policy capacity matters for capacity development: comparing teacher in-service training and career advancement in basic education systems of India and China6
Government spending and economic growth in the Middle East and North Africa region6
External control mechanisms and red tape: testing the roles of external audit and evaluation on red tape in quasi-governmental organizations6
0.01677393913269