International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

Papers
(The TQCC of International Journal for Philosophy of Religion is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-06-01 to 2026-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
Faith: intention to form theistic beliefs18
Minding creation: theological panpsychism and the doctrine of creation6
Analytic Theology and the academic study of Religion, by William Wood. Oxford University Press, 2021. 299 pages, $100.00 (hb)5
The nature of aseity and the ontological subordination problem4
Simply providential: a Thomistic response to Schmid’s providential collapse argument against classical theism4
The image of God: the problem of evil and the problem of mourning (Eleonore Stump) publisher: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022, 432 pp, $130.004
Purpose in the Universe: the Moral and metaphysical case for Ananthropocentric Purposivism, by Timothy Mulgan. Oxford University Press, 2015. 435 pp. $100 (hb), $31.95 (pb)4
Modal appearances and the modal ontological argument4
A Radical Pluralist Philosophy of Religion: Cross-Cultural, Multireligious, Interdisciplinary. Mikel Burley. Bloomsbury, 2020. 245pp., $26.95 (pb.)3
Moral substitution reimagined3
Mystical ineffability: a nonconceptual theory3
Simon Kittle and Georg Gasser, eds. The Divine Nature: personal and A-Personal perspectives. New York: Routledge, 2022. Viii + 347pp. $170.00 (hc), $39.71 (ebook)3
Abhinavagupta, the hard problem of consciousness, and the moral grounding problem3
Determined freedom: a substance-causal account of theological compatibilism2
Tyler Dalton McNabb and Erik Baldwin, Eastern Philosophy and Classical Theism2
Review of Rik peels, Life Without God2
The negative theology of absolute infinity: Cantor, mathematics, and humility2
A philosophical defence of limited foreknowledge open theism2
Pascal’s wager and the myth of the neutral calculator2
On the metaphysics of the incarnation2
Response to my fellow symposiasts2
An inexplicably good argument for causal finitism2
Wittgenstein and cognitivism about religious belief2
Can we trust the word of God? Defending skeptical theism from skeptical theology2
Kant’s Version of Lessing’s Ditch: The Historical as a Drawbridge to the Rational1
Metaphors, religious language and linguistic expressibility1
Moral knowledge: theism vs. Naturalism1
Is there something of divinity regarding Kant’s account of reason?1
Religious hinge epistemology: Are religious hinges unique?1
Incompatible and incomparable perfections: a new argument against perfect being theism1
Another Wittgensteinian response to the evolutionary argument against naturalism1
Book Symposium: John Bishop and Ken Perszyk, God, Purpose, and Reality: A Euteleological Understanding of Theism. Oxford University Press, 2023. 224 pp. $98.001
Swinburne’s theodicy: “on justifying why God permits horrendous suffering”1
The ground of beings cannot be a being: a grounding-theoretic argument1
An open theist critique of Peels’ account of divine repentance1
Prior and Aquinas: propositions and the knowledge of a tensed reality1
Hopeful universalism and the goodness of God: a fittingness approach1
Editorial preface1
Moral Normativity: Naturalism vs. Theism1
Does moral anti-theodicy beg the question?1
Is it wrong for God to create persons? A response to Monaghan1
Descartes on intellectual joy and the intellectual love of god1
Moral knowledge and epistemic limits: a theistic framework for understanding blameless ignorance1
Kant on moral character, immortality, and holiness as the limit of virtue: curing moral despair at the cost of moral anxiety1
A new Gaunilian objection to Anselm’s ‘ontological argument’1
Prolegomena to a Buddhist philosophy of religion1
A response to Swinburne’s theodicy: a simpler logical argument from evil1
Editorial Preface1
God’s necessary existence: a thomistic perspective1
Representing God as a moral agent: cognitive roots of the problem of evil and a challenge to classical theists1
Miraculosity claims as inferences to the best explanation: why reasoning about miracles must be abductive1
Perfecting agents1
Arguing from cognitive science of religion: is religious belief debunked?1
0.24446606636047