Contraception

Papers
(The H4-Index of Contraception is 21. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on economic security and pregnancy intentions among people at risk of pregnancy86
Expansion of a direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic73
Evaluation of the effect of a new oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone on hemostasis parameters62
The association between state-level abortion restrictions and maternal mortality in the United States, 1995-201757
Development of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC), a short form of the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale57
Endocrine and metabolic effects of an oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone55
Telemedicine for contraceptive counseling: An exploratory survey of US family planning providers following rapid adoption of services during the COVID-19 pandemic47
COVID-19’s impact on contraception experiences: Exacerbation of structural inequities in women's health46
Estetrol-drospirenone combination oral contraceptive: North American phase 3 efficacy and safety results44
Telemedicine for contraceptive counseling: Patient experiences during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City36
Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic35
Declines in contraceptive visits in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic34
Provision of medication abortion in Hawai‘i during COVID-19: Practical experience with multiple care delivery models32
Client satisfaction and experience of telemedicine and home use of mifepristone and misoprostol for abortion up to 10 weeks’ gestation at British Pregnancy Advisory Service: A cross-sectional evaluati29
Doctor knows best? Provider bias in the context of contraceptive counseling in the United States29
Abortion method preference among people presenting for abortion care28
Clinical and service delivery implications of omitting ultrasound before medication abortion provided via direct-to-patient telemedicine and mail in the U.S28
“It was close enough, but it wasn't close enough”: A qualitative exploration of the impact of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion on access to abortion care28
Exploring the reproductive decision support needs and preferences of women with cystic fibrosis,26
Use of nonpreferred contraceptive methods among women in Ohio23
Patient and pharmacist perspectives on pharmacist-prescribed contraception: A systematic review23
Vaginal ring acceptability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal ring experiences from around the world21
Racial and ethnic differences in family planning telehealth use during the onset of the COVID-19 response in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma21
0.098718881607056